Comparison between the accuracy of chest computerized tomography vs. reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in a tertiary care center in Lebanon; along with their correlation to mortality, morbidity and symptoms in COVID-19 patients.
AUBMC, American University of Beirut Medical Center
CAD, Coronary Artery Disease
COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
COVID
COVID, Coronavirus Disease
CT scan
CT, Computed Tomography
Ct value
Ct, Cycle threshold
ED, Emergency Department
Mm, Millimeters
PCR, Polymerase Chain Reaction
RT-PCR
RT-PCR, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Sensitivity
WHO, World Health Organization
kVp, KiloVolt power
mAs, Milliamperes
rRT-PCR, Real-time Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Journal
Human gene (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
ISSN: 2773-0441
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9918644986806676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
08
11
2022
revised:
05
01
2023
accepted:
25
01
2023
medline:
31
7
2023
pubmed:
31
7
2023
entrez:
31
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Chest Computerized Tomography has been widely used in COVID patients' assessment. Hence the question arises as to whether there is any correlation between the Ct value and findings on Chest CT scan or clinical presentation of the patient. We wanted to test the hypothesis of whether low Ct values (≤30) in RT-PCR were associated with a high mortality rate, CT scan findings, or with comorbidities such as immunosuppression and lung disease. The radiographic records and RT-PCR Ct values of 371 COVID patents diagnosed at the American University of Beirut Medical Center were reviewed. We found out that the sensitivity of chest CT scan compared to RT-PCR, the gold standard, turned out to be 74% (95% CI 69-79%). Specificity, on the other hand was 33% (95% CI 16-55%). The positive predictive value of CT was 94% (95% CI 91-97%) and the negative predictive value was 8% (95% CI 4-16%). low Ct values in RT-PCR were not associated with a higher mortality rate ( As long as this pandemic exists, nucleic acid testing was and remains the gold standard of COVID-19 diagnosis worldwide and in our community as it has a superior diagnostic accuracy to CT scan and higher sensitivity (94% vs 74%).
Identifiants
pubmed: 37521007
doi: 10.1016/j.humgen.2023.201150
pii: S2773-0441(23)00009-8
pmc: PMC9891785
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
201150Informations de copyright
© 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Viruses. 2021 Feb 11;13(2):
pubmed: 33670360
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;96:288-290
pubmed: 32437933
Radiology. 2020 Jun;295(3):200463
pubmed: 32077789
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 19;71(16):2252-2254
pubmed: 32435816
J Autoimmun. 2020 May;109:102433
pubmed: 32113704
Eur Radiol. 2021 May;31(5):2819-2824
pubmed: 33051732
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):e4197-e4205
pubmed: 32603425
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E41-E45
pubmed: 32049601
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 9;11(2):e047110
pubmed: 33563629
Eur J Radiol. 2020 May;126:108961
pubmed: 32229322
Radiology. 2020 Apr;295(1):22-23
pubmed: 32049600
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E32-E40
pubmed: 32101510
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 9;15(7):e0235844
pubmed: 32645053
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E115-E117
pubmed: 32073353