Patient Satisfaction With General Anesthesia Compared to Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: A Multicenter Observational Study.
anesthesia spinal
general anesthesia
obstetric anesthesia
parturients
patient satisfaction
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Jul 2023
Historique:
accepted:
29
07
2023
medline:
31
7
2023
pubmed:
31
7
2023
entrez:
31
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background Satisfaction in patients undergoing cesarean section (CS) is of great importance in every hospital. There are big differences between spinal and general anesthesia for CS in terms of outcome, recovery times, and quality of service. Methods This multicenter observational study included 1443 patients who had elective (n=622) or emergency (n=821) CS in five medical centers over the period of 16 months. Bauer questionnaire was used for measuring patient satisfaction after CS. The questionnaire contained 15 questions about anesthesia-related discomfort and satisfaction with anesthesia care. Results During the study period, 1161 (80%) patients underwent CS under general anesthesia (GA) and 282 of them (20%) received spinal anesthesia (SA) for CS. The most frequently reported anesthesia-related discomfort was pain at the surgical site (>70%), drowsiness (68%), and thirst (60%). The data on patient satisfaction showed high satisfaction that exceeded 90%. Anesthesia side effects were less frequent and the general satisfaction rate was higher in the SA group compared to the GA group (
Identifiants
pubmed: 37521592
doi: 10.7759/cureus.42666
pmc: PMC10386895
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e42666Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023, Sobot Novakovic et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 03;12:CD012624
pubmed: 30521692
Indian J Anaesth. 2022 Mar;66(3):224-228
pubmed: 35497696
Eur J Pain. 2015 Aug;19(7):929-39
pubmed: 25413847
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2020 May 04;140(7):
pubmed: 32378860
Cureus. 2023 Apr 4;15(4):e37118
pubmed: 37034140
World J Surg. 1993 Mar-Apr;17(2):220-5
pubmed: 8511917
Cureus. 2018 Dec 11;10(12):e3715
pubmed: 30788204
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD004350
pubmed: 23076903
BMC Womens Health. 2015 Dec 02;15:112
pubmed: 26627054
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Dec 18;14:2489-2499
pubmed: 33376310
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Dec;117(6):758-766
pubmed: 27956674
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Mar 29;19(1):104
pubmed: 30922264
Anesth Analg. 1998 Nov;87(5):1089-98
pubmed: 9806687
Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):6-10
pubmed: 10740539
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2019 Aug;47(4):282-286
pubmed: 31380508
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 02;8:694385
pubmed: 34409050
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Jun;20(2):331-46
pubmed: 16850781
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Jan;45(1):65-72
pubmed: 11152036
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2023 May-Jun;73(3):258-266
pubmed: 34963617