Based on the Real-Life Data of Türkiye; Comparison of Anatomical and Functional Outcomes of Phakic and Pseudophakic Patients in Wet Type Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Age-related macular degeneration
phakic eye
pseudophakic eye
real-life data
Journal
Beyoglu eye journal
ISSN: 2587-0394
Titre abrégé: Beyoglu Eye J
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101777848
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
17
01
2022
revised:
20
11
2022
accepted:
30
01
2023
medline:
31
7
2023
pubmed:
31
7
2023
entrez:
31
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of the study was comparison of wet-type age-related macular degeneration in phakic and pseudophakic patients in terms of anatomical and functional success based on the real-life data of Türkiye. The multicenter retrospective real-life study data of the. retinal study group were used in this study. Among 867 eyes of 867 patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the status of the lens; phakic group and pseudophakic group. The follow-up period of the two groups, the number of injections at the 1 In our study, the number of injections in the 1 Differences in the number of injections and visual results between phakic and pseudophakic patients in wet type AMD may necessitate the creation of different treatment and follow-up protocols.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37521880
doi: 10.14744/bej.2023.69782
pii: BEJ-8-73
pmc: PMC10375202
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
73-80Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 by Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
Références
Ophthalmology. 2012 Oct;119(10):2102-7
pubmed: 22721920
Ophthalmology. 2014 Jan;121(1):193-201
pubmed: 24084500
Exp Eye Res. 2005 Mar;80(3):337-47
pubmed: 15721616
Ophthalmology. 2002 Jun;109(6):1092-7
pubmed: 12045049
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010 Nov;29(6):466-75
pubmed: 20452456
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 19;364(20):1897-908
pubmed: 21526923
Eye (Lond). 2009 Jun;23(6):1388-92
pubmed: 18776863
Retina. 2014 May;34(5):853-9
pubmed: 24141904
Ophthalmology. 2007 Feb;114(2):246-52
pubmed: 17270674
N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 5;355(14):1419-31
pubmed: 17021318
Arch Ophthalmol. 1984 Nov;102(11):1640-2
pubmed: 6208888
Ophthalmology. 2003 Oct;110(10):1960-7
pubmed: 14522772
Retina. 2013 Mar;33(3):467-73
pubmed: 23400082
Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul-Sep;29(3):182-6
pubmed: 26155075
Retina. 2011 Feb;31(2):393-400
pubmed: 21099453
Ophthalmology. 2009 Jan;116(1):57-65.e5
pubmed: 19118696
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Feb 26;2018:9640131
pubmed: 29682574
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006 Feb;84(1):4-15
pubmed: 16445433
Ophthalmology. 2012 Nov;119(11):2298-303
pubmed: 22959104
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;66(12):1802-1807
pubmed: 30451182
Ophthalmology. 2012 Dec;119(12):2537-48
pubmed: 23084240
Br J Ophthalmol. 1994 Jun;78(6):441-5
pubmed: 8060925
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2009 Jun;32(6):440-51
pubmed: 19515460
Ophthalmology. 2020 Apr;127(4S):S135-S145
pubmed: 32200813
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr;153(4):678-86, 686.e1-2
pubmed: 22245460
Ophthalmology. 2013 Jun;120(6):1278-82
pubmed: 23453513
Ophthalmology. 1996 Oct;103(10):1546-54
pubmed: 8874425
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jun;35(6):987-91
pubmed: 19465281
Retina. 2015 Jan;35(1):69-74
pubmed: 25077535
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;127(11):1528-9
pubmed: 19901222
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Dec;144(6):850-857
pubmed: 17949673