Developing a Women's Thought Collective methodology for health research: The roles and responsibilities of researchers in the reflexive co-production of knowledge.
co-production
feminism
hermeneutics
knowledge
reflexivity
Journal
Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy
ISSN: 1369-7625
Titre abrégé: Health Expect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815926
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2023
10 2023
Historique:
revised:
09
06
2023
received:
12
01
2023
accepted:
10
06
2023
medline:
11
9
2023
pubmed:
31
7
2023
entrez:
31
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Co-produced research holds enormous value within the health sciences. Yet, there can be a heavy focus on what research participants think, do and know; while the researcher's responsibility to explore and re/work their own knowledge or praxis tends to escape from view. This is reflected in the limited use of co-production to explore broad structural distributions of health and risk(s). We argue this missed opportunity has the potential to unfold as what Berlant calls a 'cruel optimism', where something desirable becomes an obstacle to flourishing and/or produces harm. We explore challenges to involving lay populations meaningfully in health research amidst a neoliberal cultural landscape that tends to responsibilise people with problems they cannot solve. Drawing together principles from hermeneutic and feminist philosophy, we develop a novel methodology for co-producing research about determinants of health and health risk (using a case study of alcohol consumption as an example) that centres on what researchers do, know and think during research: Women's Thought Collectives. Keeping the constructed nature of social systems-because they shape ideas of value, expertise and knowledge-in view during co-produced research illuminates the potential for cruel optimisms within it. Such reflexive awareness carves out starting points for researchers to engage with how social hierarchies might (tacitly) operate during the co-production of knowledge. Our work has broad utility for diverse population groups and provides important considerations around the roles and responsibilities for reflexive co-production of knowledge at all levels of health systems. The development of these ideas was sparked by working with lay participants during the Women's Thought Collectives for Kristen Foley's doctoral research 2021-2023, but undertaken without their direct involvement-in accordance with the responsibilities of researchers in the reflexive co-production of knowledge. Forthcoming publications will address the outcomes and processes of this work.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Co-produced research holds enormous value within the health sciences. Yet, there can be a heavy focus on what research participants think, do and know; while the researcher's responsibility to explore and re/work their own knowledge or praxis tends to escape from view. This is reflected in the limited use of co-production to explore broad structural distributions of health and risk(s). We argue this missed opportunity has the potential to unfold as what Berlant calls a 'cruel optimism', where something desirable becomes an obstacle to flourishing and/or produces harm. We explore challenges to involving lay populations meaningfully in health research amidst a neoliberal cultural landscape that tends to responsibilise people with problems they cannot solve.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
Drawing together principles from hermeneutic and feminist philosophy, we develop a novel methodology for co-producing research about determinants of health and health risk (using a case study of alcohol consumption as an example) that centres on what researchers do, know and think during research: Women's Thought Collectives.
DISCUSSION
Keeping the constructed nature of social systems-because they shape ideas of value, expertise and knowledge-in view during co-produced research illuminates the potential for cruel optimisms within it. Such reflexive awareness carves out starting points for researchers to engage with how social hierarchies might (tacitly) operate during the co-production of knowledge. Our work has broad utility for diverse population groups and provides important considerations around the roles and responsibilities for reflexive co-production of knowledge at all levels of health systems.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION
The development of these ideas was sparked by working with lay participants during the Women's Thought Collectives for Kristen Foley's doctoral research 2021-2023, but undertaken without their direct involvement-in accordance with the responsibilities of researchers in the reflexive co-production of knowledge. Forthcoming publications will address the outcomes and processes of this work.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37522791
doi: 10.1111/hex.13804
pmc: PMC10485336
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1954-1964Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2405-2415
pubmed: 35959510
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Jul;117:104046
pubmed: 37207408
Qual Health Res. 2017 May;27(6):836-842
pubmed: 26984363
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1232-1245
pubmed: 35526274
Health Expect. 2022 Feb;25(1):38-47
pubmed: 34748689
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Dec 01;21:101277
pubmed: 33391981
Health (London). 2006 Oct;10(4):401-20
pubmed: 16973678
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Aug;306:115102
pubmed: 35750003
Health Expect. 2022 Jun;25(3):902-913
pubmed: 35322510
Br J Cancer. 2021 Oct;125(8):1168-1176
pubmed: 34483338
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):785-801
pubmed: 31012259
Qual Health Res. 1998 May;8(3):341-51
pubmed: 10558335
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):661-75
pubmed: 24325553
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Feb;44(2):488-507
pubmed: 35119118
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 7;18(1):43
pubmed: 32380998
Br J Sociol. 2014 Mar;65(1):1-20
pubmed: 24571532
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):2807-2817
pubmed: 36148630
Scand J Public Health. 2020 Aug;48(6):617-628
pubmed: 31319762
Qual Health Res. 2021 Mar;31(4):778-788
pubmed: 33349170
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2034-2042
pubmed: 33949751
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Mar;296:114712
pubmed: 35093796
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1954-1964
pubmed: 37522791
Health Promot Int. 2022 Aug 1;37(4):
pubmed: 36000531
J Particip Med. 2020 Jan 10;12(1):e15101
pubmed: 33064092
Qual Health Res. 2022 Jul;32(8-9):1297-1314
pubmed: 35638562
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 29;9:645376
pubmed: 34268284
Health Expect. 2014 Oct;17(5):637-50
pubmed: 22809132
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Mar 15;6:58
pubmed: 35211657
BMC Med. 2018 Jun 20;16(1):95
pubmed: 29921272
Health Expect. 2022 Jun;25(3):840-855
pubmed: 35174585
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Dec;44 Suppl 1:179-194
pubmed: 34874575