Reliability of urine drug testing among patients on buprenorphine transdermal patch.

Buprenorphine Cancer pain Nonmedical opioid use UDT Urine drug test

Journal

Palliative & supportive care
ISSN: 1478-9523
Titre abrégé: Palliat Support Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101232529

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Aug 2023
Historique:
medline: 1 8 2023
pubmed: 1 8 2023
entrez: 1 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Urine drug testing (UDT) plays a significant role in monitoring patients on chronic opioid therapy (COT) for non-medical opioid use (NMOU). UDT, at times, can be inconsistent and misleading. We present a case where a patient on a buprenorphine patch had false negative results. A female in her 70s with metastatic breast cancer presented with uncontrolled pain from a T6 compression fracture. She had no relief with tramadol 50 mg every 6 hours as needed. Due to an allergic reaction to hydromorphone, our team prescribed a buprenorphine patch of 5 μg/h. Subsequently, she expressed excellent pain control, and the clinician confirmed the patch placement on examination. She underwent a UDT during the visit. The UDT was negative for both buprenorphine and its metabolites. The literature review showed that false negative UDT results are relatively common among patients with low-dose buprenorphine patches. The combination of a thorough physical examination, a review of the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program, and reassuring scores on screening tools placed her at low risk for NMOU. Buprenorphine has a ceiling effect on respiratory depression and a lower risk for addiction. However, when used in low doses, the drug might not have enough metabolites in the urine, leading to a false negative UDT. Such results might affect patient-physician relationships. In addition to the UDT, a thorough history, screening for NMOU, physical exam, a review of PDMP, and a good understanding of opioid metabolism are necessary to help guide pain management.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Urine drug testing (UDT) plays a significant role in monitoring patients on chronic opioid therapy (COT) for non-medical opioid use (NMOU). UDT, at times, can be inconsistent and misleading. We present a case where a patient on a buprenorphine patch had false negative results.
CASE DESCRIPTION METHODS
A female in her 70s with metastatic breast cancer presented with uncontrolled pain from a T6 compression fracture. She had no relief with tramadol 50 mg every 6 hours as needed. Due to an allergic reaction to hydromorphone, our team prescribed a buprenorphine patch of 5 μg/h. Subsequently, she expressed excellent pain control, and the clinician confirmed the patch placement on examination. She underwent a UDT during the visit. The UDT was negative for both buprenorphine and its metabolites. The literature review showed that false negative UDT results are relatively common among patients with low-dose buprenorphine patches. The combination of a thorough physical examination, a review of the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program, and reassuring scores on screening tools placed her at low risk for NMOU.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
Buprenorphine has a ceiling effect on respiratory depression and a lower risk for addiction. However, when used in low doses, the drug might not have enough metabolites in the urine, leading to a false negative UDT. Such results might affect patient-physician relationships.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In addition to the UDT, a thorough history, screening for NMOU, physical exam, a review of PDMP, and a good understanding of opioid metabolism are necessary to help guide pain management.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37525588
doi: 10.1017/S147895152300086X
pii: S147895152300086X
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-3

Subventions

Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR003167
Pays : United States

Auteurs

Jaya Amaram-Davila (J)

Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Akhila Reddy (A)

Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Matthew D Clark (MD)

Pharmacy Clinical Programs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Anita Nancherla (A)

University of the Incarnate Word, Feik School of Pharmacy, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Joseph Arthur (J)

Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Eduardo Bruera (E)

Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Classifications MeSH