An Intensive 18F-Fludeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography With Computed Tomography-Based Strategy of Follow-Up in Patients Treated for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Who Are Clinically Asymptomatic.
Male
Adult
Humans
Middle Aged
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
/ diagnostic imaging
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
/ methods
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Follow-Up Studies
Case-Control Studies
Head and Neck Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Positron-Emission Tomography
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2023
01 08 2023
Historique:
medline:
2
8
2023
pubmed:
1
8
2023
entrez:
1
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have a significant risk of locoregional recurrence within the first 2 years, with approximately two-thirds of patients experiencing such recurrence. While early recurrence detection may be associated with improved patient outcomes, the association of such detection with survival remains uncertain. To investigate the association of an intensive posttreatment follow-up strategy using 18F-fludeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography with computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) with survival among patients with HNSCC. This case-control study was conducted among patients treated at 1 of 3 locations in Brest, France (University Hospital, Military Hospital, or Pasteur Clinic). The statistical analysis was conducted from January to June 2023. All adults with histologically proven HNSCC who were treated with curative intent between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2019, and achieved a complete response on imaging at 3 to 6 months were included. They had a minimum of 3 years of follow-up. Patients undergoing an intensive posttreatment follow-up strategy had 18FDG-PET/CT (PET/CT group) at months 12, 24, and 36, chosen at the discretion of ear, nose, and throat surgeons. Overall survival (OS) at 3 years. Among 782 patients with HNSCC (642 males [82.1%]; median [IQR] age, 61 [56-68] years), 497 patients had 18FDG-PET/CT during follow-up and 285 patients had conventional follow-up (CFU group). Cox regression analysis showed an association between undergoing 18FDG-PET/CT and lower risk of death (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57-0.88; P = .002) after adjustment for covariates (age, sex, comorbidities, primary location, stage, surgeon, year of treatment, and treatment). The mean (SD) 3-year OS was significantly better in the PET/CT vs CFU group (72.5% [2.0%] vs 64.3% [2.9%]; P = .002). Analysis based on American Joint Committee on Cancer stage showed significantly better mean (SD) 3-year OS for advanced stages III and IV in the PET/CT group (373 patients) vs CFU group (180 patients; 68.5% [2.4%] vs 55.4% [3.8%]; P < .001), while no significant difference was observed between patients with stage I or II HNSCC. Analysis based on primary tumor site revealed significantly longer mean (SD) 3-year OS for oropharyngeal tumor in the PET/CT group (176 patients) than the CFU group (100 patients; 69.9% [3.5%] vs 60.5% [5.0%]; P = .04). This case-control study found that use of 18FDG-PET/CT in the standard annual CFU of HNSCC was associated with a 3-year survival benefit, with a larger benefit for patients with advanced initial tumor stage (III-IV) and oropharyngeal disease.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37526935
pii: 2807804
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26654
pmc: PMC10394574
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
0Z5B2CJX4D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2326654Références
Clin Otolaryngol. 2008 Jun;33(3):210-22
pubmed: 18559026
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 Nov;38(11):2083-95
pubmed: 21853309
Cancer. 2013 Apr 1;119(7):1349-56
pubmed: 23225544
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):24-35
pubmed: 20530316
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Jul;41(7):1238-1244
pubmed: 32554418
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Sep;205(3):629-39
pubmed: 26295652
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Mar;67(2):93-99
pubmed: 28094848
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Jun 26;7:273
pubmed: 32714934
Eur J Radiol. 2000 Mar;33(3):239-47
pubmed: 10699740
Laryngoscope. 2012 Jul;122(7):1512-7
pubmed: 22685038
Head Neck. 1999 May;21(3):204-10
pubmed: 10208662
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Apr 01;3(4):524-548
pubmed: 27918777
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2020 Sep;29(5):e13255
pubmed: 32400912
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Jan;47(1):28-50
pubmed: 31637482
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Jun;45(6):1063-1071
pubmed: 29478080
Br J Cancer. 2013 Dec 10;109(12):2973-9
pubmed: 24149172
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Jul 1;147(7):632-637
pubmed: 33983375
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1444-54
pubmed: 27007578
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2014 Jan;23(1):36-42
pubmed: 23782223
Laryngoscope. 2013 Sep;123(9):2161-4
pubmed: 23817791
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Jan;42(1):72-8
pubmed: 25169701
J Nucl Med. 2009 Jan;50(1):24-9
pubmed: 19091901
Front Oncol. 2020 May 06;10:688
pubmed: 32435619
J Oncol. 2009;2009:208725
pubmed: 19707528
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Nov 21;13(22):
pubmed: 34830994
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun;17(6):1471-4
pubmed: 20180029
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30
pubmed: 26742998
Bull Cancer. 2019 Mar;106(3):262-274
pubmed: 30683308
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Mar;49(3):367-72
pubmed: 8676187
Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Dec;33(12):1205-1218
pubmed: 29779202
Oral Oncol. 2009 Mar;45(3):234-40
pubmed: 18715818