Effect of dietary calcium concentration and exogenous phytase on inositol phosphate degradation, mineral digestibility, and gut microbiota in growing pigs.


Journal

Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Jan 2023
Historique:
received: 07 06 2023
accepted: 29 07 2023
medline: 31 8 2023
pubmed: 1 8 2023
entrez: 1 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Variations in the dietary Ca concentration may affect inositol phosphate (InsP) degradation, and thereby, P digestibility in pigs. This study assessed the effects of dietary Ca concentration and exogenous phytase on InsP degradation, nutrient digestion and retention, blood metabolites, and microbiota composition in growing pigs with ileal cannulation. In a completely randomized row-column design with four periods, eight ileal-cannulated barrows (initial body weight 27 kg) were fed four corn-soybean- and rapeseed meal-based diets containing 5.5 or 8.5 g Ca/kg dry matter (DM), with or without 1,500 FTU of an exogenous hybrid-6-phytase/kg diet. No mineral P was added and the P concentration in the feed was 4.8 g P/kg DM. Prececal InsP6 disappearance in pigs fed diets containing exogenous phytase was lower (P = 0.022) with additional Ca than without. Concentrations of InsP2-4 isomers and myo-inositol in the distal ileal digesta and prececal P digestibility were greater (P < 0.001) with exogenous phytase than without exogenous phytase. In feces, InsP6 disappearance was lower (P < 0.002) and concentration of InsP5 and InsP4 isomers was higher (P ≤ 0.031) with additional Ca compared to without additional Ca. The prececal amino acid digestibility, energy digestibility, and hindgut disappearance of energy did not differ. The Shannon diversity index of the microbiota in the distal ileal digesta and feces was similar among the diets but was lower in the distal ileal digesta than in the feces (P < 0.001). Permutation analysis of variance revealed no dietary differences between the bacterial groups within the ileal digesta and fecal samples (P > 0.05). In conclusion, additional Ca reduced the effect of exogenous phytase on prececal InsP6 degradation. Endogenous InsP degradation was impaired by additional Ca only in the hindgut but the abundance of bacterial genera in feces was not affected. The dietary calcium concentration can influence the release of phosphorus from phytate in growing pigs. This study assessed the effects of dietary calcium and exogenous phytase on inositol phosphate (InsP) degradation and nutrient digestibility in ileal-cannulated, growing pigs. The phosphorus, calcium, and myo-inositol concentrations in the blood, microbiota composition in the ileal digesta and feces, and volatile fatty acid concentrations in the feces were also evaluated. Additional dietary calcium decreased prececal inositol hexakisphosphate (InsP6) disappearance, but only with exogenous phytase. Concentrations of InsP2-4 isomers and myo-inositol in the ileal digesta and prececal phosphorus digestibility were greater with exogenous phytase, but not affected by dietary calcium concentration. In contrast, fecal InsP6 disappearance was lower and the concentration of InsP4-5 isomers in feces was greater with additional dietary calcium. Regarding microbiota, the Shannon diversity index was lower in ileal digesta than in feces but was unaffected by dietary calcium concentration or exogenous phytase. In conclusion, dietary calcium concentration is relevant for phytate disappearance in feces, but not in the ileal digesta. However, when exogenous phytase is used, the dietary calcium concentration is important because prececal phytate degradation is changed.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
The dietary calcium concentration can influence the release of phosphorus from phytate in growing pigs. This study assessed the effects of dietary calcium and exogenous phytase on inositol phosphate (InsP) degradation and nutrient digestibility in ileal-cannulated, growing pigs. The phosphorus, calcium, and myo-inositol concentrations in the blood, microbiota composition in the ileal digesta and feces, and volatile fatty acid concentrations in the feces were also evaluated. Additional dietary calcium decreased prececal inositol hexakisphosphate (InsP6) disappearance, but only with exogenous phytase. Concentrations of InsP2-4 isomers and myo-inositol in the ileal digesta and prececal phosphorus digestibility were greater with exogenous phytase, but not affected by dietary calcium concentration. In contrast, fecal InsP6 disappearance was lower and the concentration of InsP4-5 isomers in feces was greater with additional dietary calcium. Regarding microbiota, the Shannon diversity index was lower in ileal digesta than in feces but was unaffected by dietary calcium concentration or exogenous phytase. In conclusion, dietary calcium concentration is relevant for phytate disappearance in feces, but not in the ileal digesta. However, when exogenous phytase is used, the dietary calcium concentration is important because prececal phytate degradation is changed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37526942
pii: 7234637
doi: 10.1093/jas/skad254
pmc: PMC10464513
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

6-Phytase EC 3.1.3.26
Calcium, Dietary 0
Inositol Phosphates 0
Minerals 0
Phosphorus, Dietary 0
Phytic Acid 7IGF0S7R8I

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Wilhelm Schaumann Stiftung, Hamburg
Organisme : BASF SE, Ludwigshafen, Germany

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.

Références

J Anim Sci. 2020 Mar 1;98(3):
pubmed: 32060531
J Anim Sci. 2017 Feb;95(2):779-788
pubmed: 28380613
Microorganisms. 2020 Nov 28;8(12):
pubmed: 33260576
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2017 Oct;101(5):e165-e174
pubmed: 27868294
Toxicol Lett. 1981 Sep;9(1):45-50
pubmed: 7302971
Microbiologyopen. 2016 Feb;5(1):70-82
pubmed: 26541370
J Anim Sci. 2014 Jan;92(1):189-97
pubmed: 24243891
PeerJ. 2020 May 26;8:e9124
pubmed: 32518722
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D633-42
pubmed: 24288368
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 29;99(22):14422-7
pubmed: 12381787
Animals (Basel). 2020 Sep 24;10(10):
pubmed: 32987788
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Sep;79(17):5112-20
pubmed: 23793624
Arch Tierernahr. 1998;51(1):27-38
pubmed: 9638303
Microbiome. 2017 Oct 27;5(1):144
pubmed: 29078812
J Nutr. 2002 Aug;132(8):2229-34
pubmed: 12163667
Poult Sci. 2015 May;94(5):1018-29
pubmed: 25810408
Br J Nutr. 2022 Apr 13;:1-12
pubmed: 35416139
J Sci Food Agric. 2021 Apr;101(6):2519-2524
pubmed: 33058193
Poult Sci. 2020 Dec;99(12):6797-6808
pubmed: 33248595
EFSA J. 2017 Nov 14;15(11):e05024
pubmed: 32625333
Cell Metab. 2015 Dec 1;22(6):971-82
pubmed: 26552345
Animal. 2019 Jan;13(1):64-73
pubmed: 29745350
Anal Biochem. 2011 Dec 1;419(1):67-9
pubmed: 21872565
Arch Tierernahr. 2001;55(4):255-80
pubmed: 12357589
Transl Anim Sci. 2022 Mar 02;6(1):txac020
pubmed: 35252765
Br Poult Sci. 2004 Feb;45(1):85-92
pubmed: 15115205
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2011 Jan 18;42(1-2):3-10
pubmed: 20932902
Poult Sci. 2018 Mar 1;97(3):920-929
pubmed: 29300969
Poult Sci. 2020 Jun;99(6):3251-3265
pubmed: 32475461
J Anim Sci. 1996 Jun;74(6):1288-97
pubmed: 8791201
Arch Anim Nutr. 2009;63(4):337-42
pubmed: 26967702
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jul 19;11(7):
pubmed: 34359264
Poult Sci. 2023 Apr;102(4):102476
pubmed: 36716675
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011 Mar;75(3):402-13
pubmed: 21166688
Ir Vet J. 2005 Aug 01;58(8):447-52
pubmed: 21851673
Arch Oral Biol. 1971 Apr;16(4):445-60
pubmed: 5281215
J Anim Sci. 2019 Feb 1;97(2):756-767
pubmed: 30452657
Anim Health Res Rev. 2006 Jun-Dec;7(1-2):31-41
pubmed: 17389052
J Anim Sci. 2020 Jul 1;98(7):
pubmed: 32607561
J Nutr. 2003 Oct;133(10):3187-90
pubmed: 14519808
Arch Anim Nutr. 2013 Jun;67(3):219-34
pubmed: 23679006
Klin Wochenschr. 1965 Feb 1;43:174-5
pubmed: 14258517
ISME J. 2014 Aug;8(8):1566-76
pubmed: 24522263
J Nutr. 1976 Nov;106(11):1610-6
pubmed: 185343
J Nutr. 1993 Mar;123(3):559-66
pubmed: 8463857
Poult Sci. 2018 Apr 1;97(4):1177-1188
pubmed: 29325118
Poult Sci. 2019 Nov 1;98(11):5562-5570
pubmed: 31189179
Arch Anim Nutr. 2021 Dec;75(6):450-464
pubmed: 34724855
Z Ernahrungswiss. 1997 Jun;36(2):182-90
pubmed: 9246734
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Dec;79(23):7264-72
pubmed: 24038702
Annu Rev Biochem. 1988;57:235-60
pubmed: 3052272
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1992 Oct;46 Suppl 2:S33-50
pubmed: 1330528
Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2194-200
pubmed: 21700674
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 17;10(2):e0117441
pubmed: 25688558

Auteurs

Nicolas Klein (N)

Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.

Naomi Sarpong (N)

Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.

Tanja Melzer (T)

Core Facility Hohenheim, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.

Dieter Feuerstein (D)

BASF SE, 67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany.

Charlotte M E Heyer (CME)

Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.

Amélia Camarinha-Silva (A)

Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.

Markus Rodehutscord (M)

Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH