The Complexity of Transferring Remote Monitoring and Virtual Care Technology Between Countries: Lessons From an International Workshop.
digital health innovation
digital health intervention
digital health landscape
digital health solution
health care system
regulatory pathway
remote monitoring
technology transfer
virtual care
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2023
01 08 2023
Historique:
received:
08
03
2023
accepted:
31
05
2023
revised:
25
04
2023
medline:
2
8
2023
pubmed:
1
8
2023
entrez:
1
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
International deployment of remote monitoring and virtual care (RMVC) technologies would efficiently harness their positive impact on outcomes. Since Canada and the United Kingdom have similar populations, health care systems, and digital health landscapes, transferring digital health innovations between them should be relatively straightforward. Yet examples of successful attempts are scarce. In a workshop, we identified 6 differences that may complicate RMVC transfer between Canada and the United Kingdom and provided recommendations for addressing them. These key differences include (1) minority groups, (2) physical geography, (3) clinical pathways, (4) value propositions, (5) governmental priorities and support for digital innovation, and (6) regulatory pathways. We detail 4 broad recommendations to plan for sustainability, including the need to formally consider how highlighted country-specific recommendations may impact RMVC and contingency planning to overcome challenges; the need to map which pathways are available as an innovator to support cross-country transfer; the need to report on and apply learnings from regulatory barriers and facilitators so that everyone may benefit; and the need to explore existing guidance to successfully transfer digital health solutions while developing further guidance (eg, extending the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, sustainability framework for cross-country transfer). Finally, we present an ecosystem readiness checklist. Considering these recommendations will contribute to successful international deployment and an increased positive impact of RMVC technologies. Future directions should consider characterizing additional complexities associated with global transfer.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37526964
pii: v25i1e46873
doi: 10.2196/46873
pmc: PMC10427929
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e46873Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 223267/Z/21/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
©Quynh Pham, David Wong, Kaylen J Pfisterer, Dionne Aleman, Nick Bansback, Joseph A Cafazzo, Alexander J Casson, Brian Chan, William Dixon, Gerasimos Kakaroumpas, Claudia Lindner, Niels Peek, Henry WW Potts, Barbara Ribeiro, Emily Seto, Charlotte Stockton-Powdrell, Alexander Thompson, Sabine van der Veer. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 01.08.2023.
Références
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Mar;105(3):625-631
pubmed: 34238651
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 8;22(2):e16538
pubmed: 32027309
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Feb 1;59(2):367-378
pubmed: 31335942
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 12;11(10):e053440
pubmed: 34642200
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 19;22(10):e17298
pubmed: 33074157
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 7;24(1):e29876
pubmed: 34994707
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 29;7(1):81-85
pubmed: 29325407
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Jan 15;1:20172
pubmed: 31304346
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Feb 16;14(1):e31
pubmed: 22356799
J Urban Health. 2021 Apr;98(2):183-186
pubmed: 33471281
JMIR Cardio. 2020 Nov 3;4(1):e21962
pubmed: 33141094
Digit Health. 2021 Jun 24;7:20552076211018617
pubmed: 34249371
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 May 13;9(5):e16861
pubmed: 32401224
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 01;19(11):e367
pubmed: 29092808