An improved long short term memory network for intrusion detection.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
16
12
2022
accepted:
07
04
2023
medline:
3
8
2023
pubmed:
1
8
2023
entrez:
1
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Over the years, intrusion detection system has played a crucial role in network security by discovering attacks from network traffics and generating an alarm signal to be sent to the security team. Machine learning methods, e.g., Support Vector Machine, K Nearest Neighbour, have been used in building intrusion detection systems but such systems still suffer from low accuracy and high false alarm rate. Deep learning models (e.g., Long Short-Term Memory, LSTM) have been employed in designing intrusion detection systems to address this issue. However, LSTM needs a high number of iterations to achieve high performance. In this paper, a novel, and improved version of the Long Short-Term Memory (ILSTM) algorithm was proposed. The ILSTM is based on the novel integration of the chaotic butterfly optimization algorithm (CBOA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) to improve the accuracy of the LSTM algorithm. The ILSTM was then used to build an efficient intrusion detection system for binary and multi-class classification cases. The proposed algorithm has two phases: phase one involves training a conventional LSTM network to get initial weights, and phase two involves using the hybrid swarm algorithms, CBOA and PSO, to optimize the weights of LSTM to improve the accuracy. The performance of ILSTM and the intrusion detection system were evaluated using two public datasets (NSL-KDD dataset and LITNET-2020) under nine performance metrics. The results showed that the proposed ILSTM algorithm outperformed the original LSTM and other related deep-learning algorithms regarding accuracy and precision. The ILSTM achieved an accuracy of 93.09% and a precision of 96.86% while LSTM gave an accuracy of 82.74% and a precision of 76.49%. Also, the ILSTM performed better than LSTM in both datasets. In addition, the statistical analysis showed that ILSTM is more statistically significant than LSTM. Further, the proposed ISTLM gave better results of multiclassification of intrusion types such as DoS, Prob, and U2R attacks.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37527249
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284795
pii: PONE-D-22-34491
pmc: PMC10393181
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0284795Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Awad et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022 Apr 29;8:e956
pubmed: 35634110
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0278493
pubmed: 36454861
Expert Syst. 2022 Mar;39(3):e12786
pubmed: 34511693
J Cheminform. 2021 Sep 27;13(1):74
pubmed: 34579792
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Dec 22;22(1):
pubmed: 35009568