A deep learning approach to estimating initial conditions of Brain Network Models in reference to measured fMRI data.
Brain Network Model
Neural ODEs
deep learning
fMRI
initial condition
Journal
Frontiers in neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-4548
Titre abrégé: Front Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101478481
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
06
02
2023
accepted:
05
06
2023
medline:
2
8
2023
pubmed:
2
8
2023
entrez:
2
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Brain Network Models (BNMs) are mathematical models that simulate the activity of the entire brain. These models use neural mass models to represent local activity in different brain regions that interact with each other via a global structural network. Researchers have been interested in using these models to explain measured brain activity, particularly resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). BNMs have shown to produce similar properties as measured data computed over longer periods of time such as average functional connectivity (FC), but it is unclear how well simulated trajectories compare to empirical trajectories on a timepoint-by-timepoint basis. During task fMRI, the relevant processes pertaining to task occur over the time frame of the hemodynamic response function, and thus it is important to understand how BNMs capture these dynamics over these short periods. To test the nature of BNMs' short-term trajectories, we used a deep learning technique called Neural ODE to simulate short trajectories from estimated initial conditions based on observed fMRI measurements. To compare to previous methods, we solved for the parameterization of a specific BNM, the Firing Rate Model, using these short-term trajectories as a metric. Our results show an agreement between parameterization of using previous long-term metrics with the novel short term metrics exists if also considering other factors such as the sensitivity in accuracy with relative to changes in structural connectivity, and the presence of noise. Therefore, we conclude that there is evidence that by using Neural ODE, BNMs can be simulated in a meaningful way when comparing against measured data trajectories, although future studies are necessary to establish how BNM activity relate to behavioral variables or to faster neural processes during this time period.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37529235
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1159914
pmc: PMC10390027
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1159914Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Kashyap, Plis, Ritter and Keilholz.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Netw Neurosci. 2020 May 01;4(2):448-466
pubmed: 32537536
Neuroimage. 2011 Jul 1;57(1):130-139
pubmed: 21511044
Neuroimage. 2015 May 1;111:385-430
pubmed: 25592995
Neuroimage. 2019 May 1;191:193-204
pubmed: 30753928
Neuroimage. 2020 Nov 1;221:117046
pubmed: 32603858
PLoS Biol. 2008 Jul 1;6(7):e159
pubmed: 18597554
Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 15;80:62-79
pubmed: 23684880
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):13040-5
pubmed: 19620724
Netw Neurosci. 2019 Feb 01;3(2):405-426
pubmed: 30793089
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):968-80
pubmed: 16530430
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Feb 23;20(3):340-352
pubmed: 28230845
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 15;111(28):10341-6
pubmed: 24982140
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 29;7(1):9882
pubmed: 28851996
Neuroimage. 2018 Oct 15;180(Pt B):646-656
pubmed: 28669905
Brain Connect. 2013;3(2):121-45
pubmed: 23442172
Neuroimage. 2012 Sep;62(3):1342-53
pubmed: 22705375
Front Neurosci. 2018 Sep 20;12:600
pubmed: 30294250
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 12;104(24):10240-5
pubmed: 17548818
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 23;106(25):10302-7
pubmed: 19497858
Neuroimage. 2017 Oct 15;160:84-96
pubmed: 28343985
Elife. 2018 Jan 08;7:
pubmed: 29308767
Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 1;84:1018-31
pubmed: 24071524
Neuroimage. 2014 Apr 15;90:449-68
pubmed: 24389422