Quantitative aortography for assessment of aortic regurgitation in the era of percutaneous aortic valve replacement.
aortic regurgitation
paravalvular leak
quantitative aortography
transcatheter aortic valve implantation
transcatheter aortic valve replacement
videodensitometry
Journal
Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
ISSN: 2297-055X
Titre abrégé: Front Cardiovasc Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101653388
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
08
02
2023
accepted:
24
05
2023
medline:
2
8
2023
pubmed:
2
8
2023
entrez:
2
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a shortcoming that can erode the clinical benefits of transcatheter valve replacement (TAVR) and therefore a readily applicable method (aortography) to quantitate PVL objectively and accurately in the interventional suite is appealing to all operators. The ratio between the areas of the time-density curves in the aorta and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT-AR) defines the regurgitation fraction (RF). This technique has been validated in a mock circulation; a single injection in diastole was further tested in porcine and ovine models. In the clinical setting, LVOT-AR was compared with trans-thoracic and trans-oesophageal echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. LVOT-AR > 17% discriminates mild from moderate aortic regurgitation on echocardiography and confers a poor prognosis in multiple registries, and justifies balloon post-dilatation. The LVOT-AR differentiates the individual performances of many old and novel devices and is being used in ongoing randomized trials and registries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37529710
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1161779
pmc: PMC10389707
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
1161779Informations de copyright
© 2023 Abdelshafy, Serruys, Tsai, Revaiah, Grag, Aben, Schultz, Abdelghani, Tonino, Miyazaki, Rutten, Cox, Sahyoun, Teng, Tateishi, Abdel-Wahab, Piazza, Pighi, Modolo, van Mourik, Wykrzykowska, de Wintet, Lemos, de Brito, Kawashima, Søendergaard, Rosseel, Wang, Gao, Tao, Rück, Kim, van Royen, Terkelsen, Nissen, Adam, Rudolph, Wienemann, Torii, Neuman, Schoechlin, Chen, Elkoumy, Elzomor, Amat-Santos, Mylotte, Soliman and Onuma.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
PWS reports personal fees from Philips/Volcano, SMT, Novartis, Xeltis, Merillife. PCR has no conflict of interest. Aben is an employee of Pie Medical Imaging. MC is employed by and holds shares of Xeltis BV CS is an employee of Philips Healthcare. MA-W reports other from Medtronic, other from Boston Scientific, outside the submitted work. NP is a consultant to Medtronic, Peijia, and MicroPort. RM is an employee of Boston Scientific. AR reports grants and personal fees from Boston Scientific, personal fees from Edwards Lifesciences, outside the submitted work. KK reports personal fees from Abbott, personal fees from Boston Scientific, personal fees from Edwards Lifesciences, personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from Meril Life Sciences, outside the submitted work. NVR reports grants and personal fees from Abbott, grants from Philips, grants from Biotronik, and personal fees from Microport, outside the submitted work. Rudolph is a proctor, speaker’s honoraria of JenaValve. FJN reports personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants and personal fees from Biotronic, grants and personal fees from Edwards Lifesciences, grants from Medtronic, grants and personal fees from Bayer Healthcare, personal fees from Novartis, grants from GlaxoSmithKline, grants and personal fees from Boston Scientific, personal fees from Ferrer, outside the submitted work. IJA-S is a proctor for Medtronic, Boston Scientific and Meril Life. OS and YO report several institutional research grants, outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Circ J. 2018 Jun 25;82(7):1943-1950
pubmed: 29760325
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 8;13(11):1303-1311
pubmed: 32499020
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Nov;10(5):1122-7
pubmed: 3312366
Am J Cardiol. 1989 Mar 1;63(9):585-8
pubmed: 2645760
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 12;11(3):287-297
pubmed: 29361447
EuroIntervention. 2019 Aug 29;15(5):420-426
pubmed: 31147307
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018 Aug;111(2):193-202
pubmed: 30183986
EuroIntervention. 2018 Feb 20;13(14):1652-1654
pubmed: 28606890
Glob Heart. 2021 Aug 04;16(1):54
pubmed: 34381675
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Apr;99(5):1582-1589
pubmed: 35043554
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul 26;14(14):1523-1534
pubmed: 34217623
Circ J. 2018 Aug 24;82(9):2317-2325
pubmed: 29973472
EuroIntervention. 2017 Dec 20;13(11):1288-1295
pubmed: 28691911
EuroIntervention. 2014 Jul;10(3):355-63
pubmed: 24832213
Am J Cardiol. 1973 Feb;31(2):265-72
pubmed: 4568437
EuroIntervention. 2016 Mar;11(12):1409-18
pubmed: 26999681
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 1;90(4):650-659
pubmed: 28109043
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;77(21):2717-2746
pubmed: 33888385
EuroIntervention. 2018 Jan 20;13(13):1527-1535
pubmed: 28994656
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 09;10(20):
pubmed: 34682750
Glob Heart. 2021 Mar 19;16(1):20
pubmed: 33833944
Eur Heart J. 2016 Sep 07;37(34):2627-44
pubmed: 27075871
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan 28;12(2):216-218
pubmed: 30678802
EuroIntervention. 2021 Dec 17;17(12):e1009-e1018
pubmed: 34278989
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Jul 1;382:68-75
pubmed: 37028710
Am J Cardiol. 1986 Oct 1;58(9):753-6
pubmed: 3532753
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar 8;14(5):531-538
pubmed: 33582086
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 1;93(5):963-970
pubmed: 30430723
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008 Sep;3(5):1274-81
pubmed: 18463172