Modulation of vestibular input by short-term head-down bed rest affects somatosensory perception: implications for space missions.

head-down bed rest sensory attenuation somatosensory perception tactile perception vestibular system

Journal

Frontiers in neural circuits
ISSN: 1662-5110
Titre abrégé: Front Neural Circuits
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477940

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 30 03 2023
accepted: 28 06 2023
medline: 3 8 2023
pubmed: 2 8 2023
entrez: 2 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

On Earth, self-produced somatosensory stimuli are typically perceived as less intense than externally generated stimuli of the same intensity, a phenomenon referred to as somatosensory attenuation (SA). Although this phenomenon arises from the integration of multisensory signals, the specific contribution of the vestibular system and the sense of gravity to somatosensory cognition underlying distinction between self-generated and externally generated sensations remains largely unknown. Here, we investigated whether temporary modulation of the gravitational input by head-down tilt bed rest (HDBR)-a well-known Earth-based analog of microgravity-might significantly affect somatosensory perception of self- and externally generated stimuli. In this study, 40 healthy participants were tested using short-term HDBR. Participants received a total of 40 non-painful self- and others generated electrical stimuli (20 self- and 20 other-generated stimuli) in an upright and HDBR position while blindfolded. After each stimulus, they were asked to rate the perceived intensity of the stimulation on a Likert scale. Somatosensory stimulations were perceived as significantly less intense during HDBR compared to upright position, regardless of the agent administering the stimulus. In addition, the magnitude of SA in upright position was negatively correlated with the participants' somatosensory threshold. Based on the direction of SA in the upright position, participants were divided in two subgroups. In the subgroup experiencing SA, the intensity rating of stimulations generated by others decreased significantly during HDBR, leading to the disappearance of the phenomenon of SA. In the second subgroup, on the other hand, reversed SA was not affected by HDBR. Modulation of the gravitational input by HDBR produced underestimation of somatosensory stimuli. Furthermore, in participants experiencing SA, the reduction of vestibular inputs by HDBR led to the disappearance of the SA phenomenon. These findings provide new insights into the role of the gravitational input in somatosensory perception and have important implications for astronauts who are exposed to weightlessness during space missions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37529715
doi: 10.3389/fncir.2023.1197278
pmc: PMC10390228
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1197278

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Gammeri, Salatino, Pyasik, Cirillo, Zavattaro, Serra, Pia, Roberts, Berti and Ricci.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Dec 01;15:734235
pubmed: 34924978
Nat Neurosci. 1998 Nov;1(7):635-40
pubmed: 10196573
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1998 Nov;28(1-2):143-54
pubmed: 9795191
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 12;7(1):3061
pubmed: 28607373
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jan;49(2):186-95
pubmed: 21094654
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Jul 1;34(8):1488-1499
pubmed: 35579993
Acta Astronaut. 2008 Sep;63(5-6):594-602
pubmed: 19727328
Am J Otol. 1993 Jan;14(1):9-17
pubmed: 8424485
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Feb;36(2):943-59
pubmed: 22108008
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2015 Dec;86(12 Suppl):A45-A53
pubmed: 26630195
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2010 Jan;81(1):30-40
pubmed: 20058735
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0124573
pubmed: 25875819
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2018 Aug 1;89(8):749-753
pubmed: 30020061
J Neurophysiol. 2020 May 1;123(5):2037-2063
pubmed: 32292116
Psychophysiology. 2011 Sep;48(9):1276-83
pubmed: 21449953
J Neural Eng. 2005 Sep;2(3):S164-79
pubmed: 16135882
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Nov 05;15:704668
pubmed: 34803629
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Nov;7(11):483-8
pubmed: 14585444
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Jun;59(2):139-149
pubmed: 34386801
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Sep;101(2):143-94
pubmed: 17661073
Cortex. 1990 Mar;26(1):123-31
pubmed: 2354638
J Pain Res. 2021 Jun 17;14:1837-1844
pubmed: 34168491
Front Syst Neurosci. 2015 Apr 16;9:59
pubmed: 25932009
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 1;114(31):8426-8431
pubmed: 28716932
Neuroimage. 2021 Apr 1;229:117727
pubmed: 33434613
Neuroimage. 2019 May 15;192:52-65
pubmed: 30669009
Front Integr Neurosci. 2014 Feb 14;8:16
pubmed: 24592217
Front Neural Circuits. 2021 Nov 03;15:760313
pubmed: 34803615
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Nov;79(11):1298-301
pubmed: 18550629
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Mar 15;261:275-81
pubmed: 24412686
Neural Netw. 1996 Nov;9(8):1265-1279
pubmed: 12662535
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 29;11(1):13479
pubmed: 34188078
Conscious Cogn. 2018 Feb;58:186-192
pubmed: 29305042
Neurophysiol Clin. 2015 Nov;45(4-5):241-54
pubmed: 26602955
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24932
pubmed: 21949794
Brain. 1993 Feb;116 ( Pt 1):71-86
pubmed: 8453466
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Jul-Aug;27(6):497-506
pubmed: 23401158
J Neurol. 2022 Aug;269(8):4333-4348
pubmed: 35306619
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 20;7:298
pubmed: 23801958
Neuroimage. 2012 Mar;60(1):162-9
pubmed: 22209784
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Dec 18;11:621
pubmed: 29326575
Cortex. 2019 Dec;121:253-263
pubmed: 31654897
Neurosci Lett. 2011 Feb 25;490(2):96-100
pubmed: 21182897
Eur J Neurol. 2008 Oct;15(10):1124-30
pubmed: 18717717
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Nov;40(11):1878-1885
pubmed: 31624117
Science. 1973 Jul 13;181(4095):175-7
pubmed: 4711735
Conscious Cogn. 2021 Jan;87:103058
pubmed: 33278651
Front Physiol. 2021 Feb 24;12:638669
pubmed: 33716785
PLoS One. 2015 May 18;10(5):e0127651
pubmed: 25992603
Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1818-24
pubmed: 15050602
Headache. 2017 Jul;57(7):1065-1087
pubmed: 28656612
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 Feb 13;14(2):119-127
pubmed: 30649514
Biol Cybern. 2002 Mar;86(3):209-30
pubmed: 12068787
Cortex. 2000 Feb;36(1):81-92
pubmed: 10728899
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018 Mar 1;13(3):321-330
pubmed: 29325145
NPJ Microgravity. 2021 Jul 27;7(1):29
pubmed: 34315902
Brain Struct Funct. 2016 Jun;221(5):2873-6
pubmed: 25963710
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Nov;236(11):2877-2885
pubmed: 30062442
Acta Neurol Scand. 2009 Jun;119(6):404-9
pubmed: 18853944
NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;29(2):185-95
pubmed: 22027081
J Adv Res. 2017 Nov;8(6):649-653
pubmed: 28861281
J Neurosci. 2020 Jan 22;40(4):894-906
pubmed: 31811029
Neuroimage. 2008 Oct 1;42(4):1316-23
pubmed: 18606233
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
pubmed: 5146491
Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):924-34
pubmed: 12880821
Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Jan 20;15:802148
pubmed: 35126063
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jan;208(1):29-38
pubmed: 20972670
Life (Basel). 2013 Dec 13;3(4):524-37
pubmed: 25369884
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Aug;17(8):1194-211
pubmed: 16197678
Neuroscience. 2012 Jun 14;212:159-79
pubmed: 22516007
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Mar 31;14:120
pubmed: 32296320
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Aug;117:311-321
pubmed: 29940194
Psychol Sci. 2017 Jul;28(7):882-893
pubmed: 28488908
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Feb 18;124:216-225
pubmed: 30571976
Brain Res Rev. 2011 Jun 24;67(1-2):119-46
pubmed: 21223979
Eur J Neurosci. 2011 Oct;34(8):1337-44
pubmed: 21978189
Neurosci Lett. 2013 Aug 29;550:35-40
pubmed: 23827220
Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 30;11(5):
pubmed: 33946218
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jul;51(8):1445-52
pubmed: 23624312
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 3;12(1):20888
pubmed: 36463320
Cortex. 2018 Apr;101:302-305
pubmed: 29329639
Cortex. 2013 Mar;49(3):748-58
pubmed: 22385524
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 30;11(3):e0151213
pubmed: 27028404
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Nov;36(11):2048-54
pubmed: 26185326
Neurology. 2005 Oct 25;65(8):1278-83
pubmed: 16247057
Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 May 12;9:124
pubmed: 26029071
Neurocase. 2007 Jun;13(3):185-8
pubmed: 17786778
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37959
pubmed: 22666424

Auteurs

Roberto Gammeri (R)

Space, Attention and Action (SAN) Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Adriana Salatino (A)

Space, Attention and Action (SAN) Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Maria Pyasik (M)

SpAtial, Motor and Bodily Awareness (SAMBA) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Emanuele Cirillo (E)

Space, Attention and Action (SAN) Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Claudio Zavattaro (C)

Space, Attention and Action (SAN) Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Hilary Serra (H)

Space, Attention and Action (SAN) Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Lorenzo Pia (L)

SpAtial, Motor and Bodily Awareness (SAMBA) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Donna R Roberts (DR)

Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.

Anna Berti (A)

Space, Attention and Action (SAN) Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
SpAtial, Motor and Bodily Awareness (SAMBA) Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Raffaella Ricci (R)

Space, Attention and Action (SAN) Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH