Evaluation of the SIMULRESP: A simulation software of child and teenager cardiorespiratory physiology.
clinical decision support systems
computational model
intensive care
mechanical ventilation
pediatrics
respiratory physiological concepts
Journal
Pediatric pulmonology
ISSN: 1099-0496
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Pulmonol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8510590
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2023
10 2023
Historique:
revised:
16
12
2022
received:
09
05
2022
accepted:
30
06
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
2
8
2023
entrez:
2
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mathematical models based on the physiology when programmed as a software can be used to teach cardiorespiratory physiology and to forecast the effect of various ventilatory support strategies. We developed a cardiorespiratory simulator for children called "SimulResp." The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of SimulResp. SimulResp quality was evaluated on accuracy, robustness, repeatability, and reproducibility. Blood gas values (pH, PaCO SimulResp produced healthy child physiological values within normal range (pH 7.40 ± 0.5; PaCO The cardiorespiratory simulator SimulResp requires further development before future integration into a clinical decision support system.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Mathematical models based on the physiology when programmed as a software can be used to teach cardiorespiratory physiology and to forecast the effect of various ventilatory support strategies. We developed a cardiorespiratory simulator for children called "SimulResp." The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of SimulResp.
METHODS
SimulResp quality was evaluated on accuracy, robustness, repeatability, and reproducibility. Blood gas values (pH, PaCO
RESULTS
SimulResp produced healthy child physiological values within normal range (pH 7.40 ± 0.5; PaCO
CONCLUSIONS
The cardiorespiratory simulator SimulResp requires further development before future integration into a clinical decision support system.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2832-2840Informations de copyright
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Sward KA, Newth CJL, Khemani RG, et al. Potential acceptability of a pediatric ventilator management computer protocol. Pediatr Critical Care Med. 2017;18(11):1027-1034.
Flechelles O, Ho A, Hernert P, et al. Simulations for mechanical ventilation in children: review and future prospects. Crit Care Res Pract. 2013;2013:1-8.
Morozoff E, Smyth JA, Saif M. Applying computer models to realize closed-loop neonatal oxygen therapy. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(1):95-103.
Flechelles O, Hernert P, Cheriet F, Zaglam N, Emeriaud G, Jouvet P. 999 validation of pediatric cardiorespiratory simulator: simulresp. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(suppl 2):A286-A287.
Das A, Gao Z, Menon PP, Hardman JG, Bates DG. A systems engineering approach to validation of a pulmonary physiology simulator for clinical applications. J R Soc Interface. 2010;8(54):44-55.
Summers RL. Computer simulation studies and the scientific method. J Appl Animal Welfare Sci. 1998;1(2):119-131.
Summers RL, Ward KR, Witten T, et al. Validation of a computational platform for the analysis of the physiologic mechanisms of a human experimental model of hemorrhage. Resuscitation. 2009;80(12):1405-1410.
Dickinson CJ. A Computer Model of Human Respiration: Ventilation, Blood Gas Transport and Exchange, Hydrogen Ion Regulation. M. T. P. Press; 1977.
Chatburn RL, Mireles-Cabodevila E. Handbook of Respiratory Care. Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2011.
Aguilaniu B, Flore P, Maitre J, Ochier J, Lacour JR, Perrault H. Early onset of pulmonary gas exchange disturbance during progressive exercise in healthy active men. J Appl Physiol. 2002;92(5):1879-1884.
Cherry AD, Forkner IF, Frederick HJ, et al. Predictors of increased PaCO2 during immersed prone exercise at 4.7 ATA. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106(1):316-325.
Baudin F, Bourgoin P, Brossier D, et al. Noninvasive estimation of arterial CO2 from end-tidal CO2 in mechanically ventilated children: the GRAeDIENT pilot study. Pediatr Critical Care Med. 2016;17(12):1117-1123.
Sargent RG. Verification and validation of simulation models. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference. Baltimore, MD, USA: IEEE; 2010:166-183.
Gamer M, Lemon J, Singh IFP. irr: various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement [Internet]. 2019. https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=irr
Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-163.
Martin Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327(8476):307-310.
Michael S, David B. BlandAltman: Bland-Altman analysis and plot [Internet]. 2018. http://github.com/sauthiem/BlandAltman
Balinotti JE, Tiller CJ, Llapur CJ, et al. Growth of the lung parenchyma early in life. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179(2):134-137.
Openshaw P, Edwards S, Helms P. Changes in rib cage geometry during childhood. Thorax. 1984;39(8):624-627.
Gaultier C. Respiratory muscle function in infants. Eur Respir J. 1995;8(1):150-153.
Keegan R, Henderson T, Brown G. Use of the virtual ventilator, a screen-based computer simulation, to teach the principles of mechanical ventilation. J Vet Med Educ. 2009;36(4):436-443.
Rutledge GW. VentSim: a simulation model of cardiopulmonary physiology. In: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care. American Medical Informatics Association; 1994: 878.
Lino JA, Gomes GC, Sousa NDSVC, et al. A critical review of mechanical ventilation virtual simulators: is it time to use them? JMIR Med Educ. 2016;2(1):e8.
Reynolds A, Bard Ermentrout G, Clermont G. A mathematical model of pulmonary gas exchange under inflammatory stress. J Theor Biol. 2010;264(2):161-173.
Karbing DS, Allerød C, Thorgaard P, et al. Prospective evaluation of a decision support system for setting inspired oxygen in intensive care patients. J Crit Care. 2010;25(3):367-374.
McCahon RA, Columb MO, Mahajan RP, Hardman JG. Validation and application of a high-fidelity, computational model of acute respiratory distress syndrome to the examination of the indices of oxygenation at constant lung-state. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(3):358-365.
Pace DK. Modeling and simulation verification and validation challenges. Johns Hopkins APL Tech Dig. 2004;25(2):10.
O'Connor DP, Mahar MT, Laughlin MS, Jackson AS. The Bland-Altman method should not be used in regression cross-validation studies. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011;82(4):610-616.
Wang A, Mahfouf M, Mills GH, et al. Intelligent model-based advisory system for the management of ventilated intensive care patients: hybrid blood gas patient model. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2010;99(2):195-207.
Brossier D, Sauthier M, Alacoque X, et al. Perpetual and virtual patients for cardiorespiratory physiological studies. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2016;05(03):122-128.
Brossier D, El Taani R, Sauthier M, Roumeliotis N, Emeriaud G, Jouvet P. Creating a high-frequency electronic database in the PICU: the perpetual patient. Pediatr Critical Care Med. 2018;19(4):e189-e198.
Gutierrez G. Artificial intelligence in the intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):101.
Meskó B, Görög M. A short guide for medical professionals in the era of artificial intelligence. npj Digital Medicine. 2020;3(1):126.