Medial tibial bone resorption following total knee arthroplasty comparing a traditional with a kinematic design.
Attune knee prosthesis
Knee arthroplasty
PFC Sigma knee
Stress shielding
Journal
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
ISSN: 1434-3916
Titre abrégé: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9011043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
02
02
2023
accepted:
17
07
2023
medline:
13
11
2023
pubmed:
2
8
2023
entrez:
2
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
New total knee prostheses are being designed to improve clinical outcome, survivorship and patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A new knee system was developed with improvements in patellofemoral joint, trochlear geometry, polyethylene formulation and tibial baseplate. Aim of this study was to compare the newer kinematic knee system with its existing predecessor knee system in terms of clinical outcome, revision rates, radiographic outcomes specifically medial tibial bone resorption. The prospective matched-pair study included 88 TKA surgeries using newer kinematic design knee prostheses, performed between January 2015 and December 2016, out of which 82 patients were available for final follow-up. The control cohort of 82 traditional TKA prosthesis was matched in terms of age, gender and body mass index. All surgeries were performed by the single surgeon using medial parapatellar arthrotomy and posterior stabilized implants were used. Clinical outcomes were assessed using knee society score, range of motion (ROM), anterior knee pain and crepitation. Radiological examinations included recording of radiolucent lines and medial tibial bone resorption. At the 5-year follow-up, no significant differences were noted in terms of mean knee society score (93.3 ± 6.6 vs 94.2 ± 8.1), knee function score (88.5 ± 10.5 vs 89.1 ± 11.2) and ROM. The incidences of anterior knee pain and crepitation were lower in the newer group (8.5% vs 21.9% and 14.6% vs 32.9%, respectively) compared to the traditional prosthesis group. No cases of aseptic loosening were observed in either cohort. No significant difference was seen in terms of radiolucent lines (29.3% vs 26.8%) and medial tibial resorption (2.43% in each group) incidences. At the 5 years follow-up no significant differences were noted between the two groups in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes, except the former proved to be better for anterior knee pain and crepitation. II.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
New total knee prostheses are being designed to improve clinical outcome, survivorship and patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A new knee system was developed with improvements in patellofemoral joint, trochlear geometry, polyethylene formulation and tibial baseplate. Aim of this study was to compare the newer kinematic knee system with its existing predecessor knee system in terms of clinical outcome, revision rates, radiographic outcomes specifically medial tibial bone resorption.
METHODS
METHODS
The prospective matched-pair study included 88 TKA surgeries using newer kinematic design knee prostheses, performed between January 2015 and December 2016, out of which 82 patients were available for final follow-up. The control cohort of 82 traditional TKA prosthesis was matched in terms of age, gender and body mass index. All surgeries were performed by the single surgeon using medial parapatellar arthrotomy and posterior stabilized implants were used. Clinical outcomes were assessed using knee society score, range of motion (ROM), anterior knee pain and crepitation. Radiological examinations included recording of radiolucent lines and medial tibial bone resorption.
RESULTS
RESULTS
At the 5-year follow-up, no significant differences were noted in terms of mean knee society score (93.3 ± 6.6 vs 94.2 ± 8.1), knee function score (88.5 ± 10.5 vs 89.1 ± 11.2) and ROM. The incidences of anterior knee pain and crepitation were lower in the newer group (8.5% vs 21.9% and 14.6% vs 32.9%, respectively) compared to the traditional prosthesis group. No cases of aseptic loosening were observed in either cohort. No significant difference was seen in terms of radiolucent lines (29.3% vs 26.8%) and medial tibial resorption (2.43% in each group) incidences.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
At the 5 years follow-up no significant differences were noted between the two groups in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes, except the former proved to be better for anterior knee pain and crepitation.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
METHODS
II.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37530846
doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05000-y
pii: 10.1007/s00402-023-05000-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
7139-7146Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ, National Joint Registry for England and Wales (2007) The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89(7):893–900. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.19091
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.19091
Scott CE, Howie CR, MacDonald D, Biant LC (2010) Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Jt Surg Br 92(9):1253–1258. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B9.24394
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B9.24394
Nam D, Nunley RM, Barrack RL (2014) Patient dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a growing concern? Bone Jt J 96-B(11 Supple A):96–100. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34152
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34152
Maniar RN, Bhatnagar N, Bidwai R, Dhiman A, Chanda D, Sanghavi N (2022) Comparison of patellofemoral outcomes between Attune and PFC Sigma designs: a prospective matched-pair analysis. Clin Orthop Surg 14(1):96–104. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios20130
doi: 10.4055/cios20130
pubmed: 35251546
Ranawat CS, White PB, West S, Ranawat AS (2017) Clinical and radiographic results of Attune and PFC Sigma knee designs at 2-year follow-up: a prospective matched-pair analysis. J Arthroplast 32(2):431–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.021
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.021
Song SJ, Kang SG, Park CH, Bae DK (2018) Comparison of clinical results and risk of patellar injury between Attune and PFC Sigma knee systems. Knee Surg Relat Res 30(4):334–340. https://doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.18.020
doi: 10.5792/ksrr.18.020
pubmed: 30173500
pmcid: 6254870
Cerquiglini A, Henckel J, Hothi H et al (2019) Analysis of the Attune tibial tray backside: a comparative retrieval study. Bone Jt Res 8(3):136–145. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.83.BJJ-2018-0102.R2
doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.83.BJJ-2018-0102.R2
Martin JR, Jennings JM, Watters TS, Levy DL, McNabb DC, Dennis DA (2017) Femoral implant design modification decreases the incidence of patellar crepitus in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 32(4):1310–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.025
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.025
Panchani SK, Divecha HM, Lafferty R et al (2021) Early functional outcomes after evolutionary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Is new always better? JB JS Open Access 6(3):e21.00016. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00016
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00016
pubmed: 34337284
pmcid: 8318648
Carey BW, Harty J (2018) A comparison of clinical- and patient-reported outcomes of the cemented ATTUNE and PFC sigma fixed bearing cruciate sacrificing knee systems in patients who underwent total knee replacement with both prostheses in opposite knees. J Orthop Surg Res 13(1):54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0757-6
doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0757-6
pubmed: 29544516
pmcid: 5856217
Bonutti PM, Khlopas A, Chughtai M et al (2017) Unusually high rate of early failure of tibial component in ATTUNE total knee arthroplasty system at implant-cement interface. J Knee Surg 30(5):435–439. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603756
doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1603756
pubmed: 28591930
Murphy JD, Braunlich PR, Judson Iv WR, Harker JN, Baumann PA (2021) Early aseptic failure of the tibial component-cement interface in ATTUNE
doi: 10.7759/cureus.20582
pubmed: 35103160
pmcid: 8776517
Martin JR, Watts CD, Levy DL, Kim RH (2017) Medial tibial stress shielding: a limitation of cobalt chromium tibial baseplates. J Arthroplast 32(2):558–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.027
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.07.027
Yoon C, Chang MJ, Chang CB, Song MK, Shin JH, Kang SB (2018) Medial tibial periprosthetic bone resorption and its effect on clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty: cobalt-chromium vs titanium implants. J Arthroplast 33(9):2835–2842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.025
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.025
Martin JR, Watts CD, Levy DL, Miner TM, Springer BD, Kim RH (2017) Tibial tray thickness significantly increases medial tibial bone resorption in cobalt-chromium total knee arthroplasty implants. J Arthroplast 32(1):79–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.007
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.007
Deen JT, Clay TB, Iams DA, Horodyski M, Parvataneni HK (2017) Proximal tibial resorption in a modern total knee prosthesis. Arthroplast Today 4(2):244–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2017.10.005
doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.10.005
pubmed: 29896562
pmcid: 5994597
Willy RW, Hoglund LT, Barton CJ et al (2019) Patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 49(9):CPG1–CPG95. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2019.0302
doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.0302
pubmed: 31475628
Ewald FC (1989) The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9–12
doi: 10.1097/00003086-198911000-00003
Nakahara H, Okazaki K, Mizu-Uchi H et al (2015) Correlations between patient satisfaction and ability to perform daily activities after total knee arthroplasty: why aren’t patients satisfied? J Orthop Sci 20(1):87–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-014-0671-7
doi: 10.1007/s00776-014-0671-7
pubmed: 25366699
Robinson T, King SW, Pilling RWD et al (2021) Attune total knee arthroplasty: is there evidence of early tibial component de-bonding? A prospective cohort study with a minimum two year follow-up. J Arthrosc Jt Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jajs.2021.03.007
doi: 10.1016/j.jajs.2021.03.007
Sires J, Lennon S, Inglis M, Nguyen A, Wilson C (2020) Early results of the Attune knee system: a minimum 2 year follow up observational study. Open Access J Biomed Sci 2(4):494–498. https://doi.org/10.38125/OAJBS.000201
doi: 10.38125/OAJBS.000201
Bateman DK, Preston JS, Mennona S, Gui E, Kayiaros S (2020) Comparison between the Attune and PFC Sigma in total knee arthroplasty: no difference in patellar clunk and crepitus or anterior knee pain. Orthopedics 43(6):e508–e514. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20200812-05
doi: 10.3928/01477447-20200812-05
pubmed: 32818287
Wong DW, Lee QJ, Lo CK, Wong YC, Law KW, Li AH (2020) Tibial tray thickness does not significantly increase medial tibial bone resorption: using tibial bone density as an objective measurement method. Knee 27(2):572–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2019.12.011
doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.12.011
pubmed: 31954609
Shichman I, Oakley CT, Thomas J, Fernandez-Madrid I, Meftah M, Schwarzkopf R (2023) Comparison of traditional PS versus kinematically designs in primary total knee arthroplasty [published online ahead of print, 2023 Jan 10]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04763-8
Choudhury AK, Gupta K, Ansari S, Raja BS, Paul S, Kalia RB (2023) Modern implants in total knee arthroplasty are more patellofemoral joint friendly compared to their traditional design: a systematic review and meta-analysis [published online ahead of print, 2023 Mar 24]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04832-y
Vanitcharoenkul E, Unnanuntana A (2021) Midterm functional recovery of total knee arthroplasty patients compared between the ATTUNE knee system and the press fit condylar (PFC) SIGMA knee system. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22(1):620. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04464-6
doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04464-6
pubmed: 34256770
pmcid: 8278715