Acceptability of 4-poster deer treatment devices for community-wide tick control among residents of high Lyme disease incidence counties in Connecticut and New York, USA.


Journal

Ticks and tick-borne diseases
ISSN: 1877-9603
Titre abrégé: Ticks Tick Borne Dis
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101522599

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2023
Historique:
received: 27 04 2023
revised: 12 06 2023
accepted: 14 07 2023
medline: 27 9 2023
pubmed: 3 8 2023
entrez: 2 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The 4-Poster Tick Control Deer Feeder (4-poster) device applies acaricide to white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and can reduce populations of the blacklegged tick (Ixodes scapularis), which transmits the agents of Lyme disease, anaplasmosis, babesiosis, and Powassan virus disease in the Northeastern United States. While 4-poster devices have the potential to provide community-wide management of blacklegged ticks in Lyme disease endemic areas, no recent study has assessed their acceptability among residents. We conducted a survey of residents from 16 counties with high annual average Lyme disease incidence (≥ 10 cases per 100,000 persons between 2013 and 2017) in Connecticut and New York to understand perceptions and experiences related to tickborne diseases, support or concerns for placement of 4-poster devices in their community, and opinions on which entities should be responsible for tick control on private properties. Overall, 37% of 1652 respondents (5.5% response rate) would support placement of a 4-poster device on their own property, 71% would support placement on other private land in their community, and 90% would support placement on public land. Respondents who were male, rented their property, resided on larger properties, or were very or extremely concerned about encountering ticks on their property were each more likely to support placement of 4-poster devices on their own property. The primary reason for not supporting placement of a 4-poster device on one's own property was the need for weekly service visits from pest control professionals, whereas the top reason for not supporting placement on other land (private or public) was safety concerns. Most respondents (61%) felt property owners should be responsible for tick control on private properties. Communities considering 4-poster devices as part of a tick management strategy should consider targeting owners of larger properties and placing devices on public lands.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37531890
pii: S1877-959X(23)00112-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2023.102231
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102231

Subventions

Organisme : NCPDCID CDC HHS
ID : U01 CI000307
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCEZID CDC HHS
ID : U50 CK000195
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCPDCID CDC HHS
ID : U01 CI000311
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCEZID CDC HHS
ID : U50 CK000199
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest None.

Auteurs

Courtney C Nawrocki (CC)

Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA. Electronic address: osm9@cdc.gov.

Nicholas Piedmonte (N)

Bureau of Communicable Disease Control, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA.

Sara A Niesobecki (SA)

Connecticut Emerging Infections Program, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.

Adam Rowe (A)

Bureau of Communicable Disease Control, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA.

AmberJean P Hansen (AP)

Connecticut Emerging Infections Program, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.

Alison Kaufman (A)

Bureau of Communicable Disease Control, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA.

Erik Foster (E)

Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

James I Meek (JI)

Connecticut Emerging Infections Program, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.

Linda Niccolai (L)

Connecticut Emerging Infections Program, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.

Jennifer White (J)

Bureau of Communicable Disease Control, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA.

Bryon Backenson (B)

Bureau of Communicable Disease Control, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA.

Lars Eisen (L)

Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

Sarah A Hook (SA)

Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

Neeta P Connally (NP)

Department of Biology, Western Connecticut State University, Danbury, CT, USA.

Victoria L Hornbostel (VL)

Department of Biology, Western Connecticut State University, Danbury, CT, USA.

Alison F Hinckley (AF)

Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH