Deviants violating higher-order auditory regularities can become predictive and facilitate behaviour.
Auditory perception
Deviant repetition
Higher-order regularity
Oddball
Predictive processing
Journal
Attention, perception & psychophysics
ISSN: 1943-393X
Titre abrégé: Atten Percept Psychophys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101495384
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
accepted:
07
07
2023
medline:
26
10
2023
pubmed:
3
8
2023
entrez:
2
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The human auditory system is believed to represent regularities inherent in auditory information in internal models. Sounds not matching the standard regularity (deviants) elicit prediction error, alerting the system to information not explainable within currently active models. Here, we examine the widely neglected characteristic of deviants bearing predictive information themselves. In a modified version of the oddball paradigm, using higher-order regularities, we set up different expectations regarding the sound following a deviant. Higher-order regularities were defined by the relation of pitch within tone pairs (rather than absolute pitch of individual tones). In a deviant detection task participants listened to oddball sequences including two deviant types following diametrically opposed rules: one occurred mostly in succession (high repetition probability) and the other mostly in isolation (low repetition probability). Participants in Experiment 1 were not informed (naïve), whereas in Experiment 2 they were made aware of the repetition rules. Response times significantly decreased from first to second deviant when repetition probability was high-albeit more in the presence of explicit rule knowledge. There was no evidence of a facilitation effect when repetition probability was low. Significantly more false alarms occurred in response to standards following high compared with low repetition probability deviants, but only in participants aware of the repetition rules. These findings provide evidence that not only deviants violating lower- but also higher-order regularities can inform predictions about auditory events. More generally, they confirm the utility of this new paradigm to gather further insights into the predictive properties of the human brain.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37532882
doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02763-9
pii: 10.3758/s13414-023-02763-9
pmc: PMC10600044
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2731-2750Subventions
Organisme : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
ID : M526300
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
PLoS One. 2007 Nov 07;2(11):e1131
pubmed: 17987118
Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Oct;24(5):849-78; discussion 878-937
pubmed: 12239891
Brain Topogr. 2014 Jul;27(4):565-77
pubmed: 24271978
Psychophysiology. 2011 Oct;48(10):1434-43
pubmed: 21913927
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Aug;18(8):1292-303
pubmed: 16859415
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2006 Nov;59(Pt 2):257-73
pubmed: 17067412
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Jun;36(3):181-204
pubmed: 23663408
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Oct;49(12):3399-405
pubmed: 21872613
Neuroreport. 2003 Apr 15;14(5):715-8
pubmed: 12692469
Neuroreport. 2005 Feb 28;16(3):301-5
pubmed: 15706240
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jul;17(2):347-57
pubmed: 12880905
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Dec;45(4):905-27
pubmed: 23519455
Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Feb;83(2):132-43
pubmed: 22047947
J Neurosci. 2004 Nov 17;24(46):10440-53
pubmed: 15548659
Cognition. 2011 Jun;119(3):374-80
pubmed: 21382615
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000 Dec;24(12):1850-4
pubmed: 11141044
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Aug;48(10):3009-18
pubmed: 20547170
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 May 19;370(1668):
pubmed: 25823866
Exp Psychol. 2010;57(1):68-76
pubmed: 20178965
Psychophysiology. 2014 May;51(5):437-45
pubmed: 24611446
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Oct;81(7):2139-2154
pubmed: 31168699
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Dec;12(3):431-9
pubmed: 11689303
Psychophysiology. 2008 Jul;45(4):608-20
pubmed: 18346043
Psychophysiology. 2020 Apr;57(4):e13528
pubmed: 31970811
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 20;108(51):20754-9
pubmed: 22147913
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Mar;120(3):453-63
pubmed: 19181570
Front Neurosci. 2014 Jun 25;8:180
pubmed: 25009462
Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Feb;83(2):200-7
pubmed: 22108539
Front Neurosci. 2014 Mar 31;8:60
pubmed: 24744695
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Feb;11(2):127-38
pubmed: 20068583
Trends Neurosci. 2004 Dec;27(12):712-9
pubmed: 15541511
Neurosci Lett. 2000 Jun 30;287(3):167-70
pubmed: 10863021
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Apr 29;360(1456):815-36
pubmed: 15937014
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Mar;47(1):1-12
pubmed: 24683129
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 26;10(6):e0130834
pubmed: 26114751
Eur J Neurosci. 2014 Jan;39(2):308-18
pubmed: 24236753
Neuroreport. 1992 Dec;3(12):1149-51
pubmed: 1493229
Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 May;124(5):928-40
pubmed: 23266090
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 11;11:468
pubmed: 32595529
J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):434-446
pubmed: 19884961
Psychophysiology. 1984 Jul;21(4):434-41
pubmed: 6463176
Brain Lang. 2015 Sep;148:1-22
pubmed: 26184883
Psychophysiology. 2005 Nov;42(6):668-76
pubmed: 16364062
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Apr;16(2):225-37
pubmed: 19293088
Brain Res. 2010 Jan 15;1310:113-23
pubmed: 19914219
Biol Psychol. 2005 Jan;68(1):1-14
pubmed: 15312692
Cogn Psychol. 2008 Aug;57(1):20-55
pubmed: 18255052
Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 May;88(2):109-23
pubmed: 23542165
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jan;2(1):6-10
pubmed: 30980045
Exp Brain Res. 2018 May;236(5):1519-1530
pubmed: 29564505