A Canonical Correlation Analysis Study on the Association Between Neighborhood Green Space and Residents' Mental Health.
Accessibility
Canonical correlation analysis
Mental health
Neighborhood green space
Quality
Journal
Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
ISSN: 1468-2869
Titre abrégé: J Urban Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9809909
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2023
08 2023
Historique:
accepted:
19
06
2023
pmc-release:
01
08
2024
medline:
24
8
2023
pubmed:
3
8
2023
entrez:
3
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Based on survey data conducted in Guangzhou in 2021, this study employs canonical correlation analysis (CCA) to evaluate the relationship between neighborhood green space, residents' green space use behavior, and their mental health. The results show that compared with the objectively measured accessibility, residents' subjective perceived accessibility of neighborhood green space plays a greater role in promoting green space use behavior and mental health. Meanwhile, the plant diversity, safety, and the number of recreational facilities in a green space can promote the frequency of green space use, improve residents' mental health status and reduce their perceived stress. Although perceived accessibility is more related to green space use behavior than green space quality indicators, green space safety and recreational facilities have many more benefits on mental health than perceived accessibility. In addition, residents' green space use behavior, especially green space visit frequency, can promote mental health and reduce perceived stress.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37535303
doi: 10.1007/s11524-023-00756-5
pii: 10.1007/s11524-023-00756-5
pmc: PMC10447345
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
696-710Informations de copyright
© 2023. The New York Academy of Medicine.
Références
Evans GW. The built environment and mental health. J Urban Health. 2003;80(4):536–55.
doi: 10.1093/jurban/jtg063
pubmed: 14709704
pmcid: 3456225
Rivera-Segarra E, Mascayano F, Alnasser L, van der Ven E, Martínez-Alés G, Durand-Arias S, Moro MF, Karam E, Hernández-Torres R, Alarcón S, et al. Global mental health research and practice: a decolonial approach. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(7):595–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00043-8 .
doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00043-8
pubmed: 35397800
Diener A, Mudu P. How can vegetation protect us from air pollution? A critical review on green spaces’ mitigation abilities for air-borne particles from a public health perspective - with implications for urban planning. Sci Total Environ. 2021;796:148605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148605 .
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148605
pubmed: 34271387
Wang C, Ren Z, Dong Y, Zhang P, Guo Y, Wang W, Bao G. Efficient cooling of cities at global scale using urban green space to mitigate urban heat island effects in different climatic regions. Urban For Urban Green. 2022;74:127635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127635 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127635
Castelli KR, Silva AM, Dunning JB. Improving the biodiversity in urban green spaces: a nature based approach. Ecol Eng. 2021;173:106398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106398 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106398
Liu Y, Wang R, Grekousis G, Liu Y, Yuan Y, Li Z. Neighbourhood greenness and mental wellbeing in Guangzhou, China: what are the pathways? Landsc Urban Plan. 2019;190:103602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103602 .
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103602
Kaplan S. The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol. 1995;15(3):169–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 .
doi: 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
Zhang R, Zhang C, Rhodes RE. The pathways linking objectively-measured greenspace exposure and mental health: a systematic review of observational studies. Environ Res. 2021;198:111233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111233 .
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111233
pubmed: 33933490
Staats H, Gatersleben B, Hartig T. Change in mood as a function of environmental design: arousal and pleasure on a simulated forest hike. J Environ Psychol. 1997;17(4):283–300. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1997.0069 .
doi: 10.1006/jevp.1997.0069
McCormick R. Does access to green space impact the mental well-being of children: a systematic review. J Pediatr Nurs. 2017;37:3–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2017.08.027 .
doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2017.08.027
pubmed: 28882650
Yao W, Zhang X, Gong Q. The effect of exposure to the natural environment on stress reduction: a meta-analysis. Urban For Urban Green. 2021;57:126932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126932 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126932
Ekkel ED, de Vries S. Nearby green space and human health: evaluating accessibility metrics. Landsc Urban Plan. 2017;157:214–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.008 .
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.008
Lau KK, Yung CC, Tan Z. Usage and perception of urban green space of older adults in the high-density city of Hong Kong. Urban For Urban Green. 2021;64:127251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127251 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127251
Reyes-Riveros R, Altamirano A, De La Barrera F, Rozas-Vásquez D, Vieli L, Meli P. Linking public urban green spaces and human well-being: a systematic review. Urban For Urban Green. 2021;61:127105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127105 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127105
Yoo E, Roberts JE, Eum Y, Li X, Konty K. Exposure to urban green space may both promote and harm mental health in socially vulnerable neighborhoods: a neighborhood-scale analysis in New York City. Environ Res. 2022;204:112292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112292 .
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112292
pubmed: 34728238
Yang W, Yang R, Zhou S. The spatial heterogeneity of urban green space inequity from a perspective of the vulnerable: a case study of Guangzhou. China Cities. 2022;130:103855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103855 .
doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103855
Sarkar C, Webster C, Gallacher J. Residential greenness and prevalence of major depressive disorders: a cross-sectional, observational, associational study of 94 879 adult UK Biobank participants. Lancet Planet Health. 2018;2(4):e162–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30051-2 .
doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30051-2
pubmed: 29615217
Dzhambov AM, Iana M, Terry H, Boris T, Zlatoslav A, Drozdstoj S, Penka G, Dimitrova DD. Multiple pathways link urban green- and bluespace to mental health in young adults. Environ Res. 2018;166:223–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.004 .
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.004
pubmed: 29890427
Houlden V, Porto De Albuquerque J, Weich S, Jarvis S. A spatial analysis of proximate greenspace and mental wellbeing in London. Appl Geogr. 2019;109:102036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102036 .
doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102036
van den Berg AE, Maas J, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP. Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(8):1203–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.002
pubmed: 20163905
Krols J, Aerts R, Vanlessen N, Dewaelheyns V, Dujardin S, Somers B. Residential green space, gardening, and subjective well-being: a cross-sectional study of garden owners in northern Belgium. Landsc Urban Plan. 2022;223:104414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104414 .
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104414
Herrero J, Meneses J. Short Web-based versions of the perceived stress (PSS) and Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CESD) Scales: a comparison to pencil and paper responses among Internet users. Comput Hum Behav. 2006;22(5):830–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.007 .
doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.007
Berwick DM, Murphy JM, Goldman PA Jr, Ware JE, Barsky AJ, Weinstein MC. Performance of a five-item mental health screening test. Med Care. 1991;29(2):169–76. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199102000-00008 .
doi: 10.1097/00005650-199102000-00008
pubmed: 1994148
Zhang YJ, Mavoa S, Zhao JF, Raphael D, Smith M. The association between green space and adolescents’ mental well-being: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res. 2020;17(18):6640. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186640 .
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186640
Geneshka M, Coventry P, Cruz J, Gilbody S. Relationship between green and blue spaces with mental and physical health: a systematic review of longitudinal observational studies. Int J Environ Res. 2021;18(17):9010. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179010 .
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179010
Sturm R, Cohen D. Proximity to urban parks and mental health. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2014;17(1):19–24.
pubmed: 24864118
pmcid: 4049158
Loder AKF, Schwerdtfeger AR, van Poppel MNM. Perceived greenness at home and at university are independently associated with mental health. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):802. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8412-7 .
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8412-7
pubmed: 32466751
pmcid: 7254725
Reklaitiene R, Grazuleviciene R, Dedele A, Virviciute D, Vensloviene J, Tamosiunas A, Baceviciene M, Luksiene D, Sapranaviciute-Zabazlajeva L, Radisauskas R, et al. The relationship of green space, depressive symptoms and perceived general health in urban population. Scand J Public Health. 2014;42(7):669–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494814544494 .
doi: 10.1177/1403494814544494
pubmed: 25118199
Noordzij JM, Beenackers MA, Groeniger JO, Van Lenthe FJ. Effect of changes in green spaces on mental health in older adults: a fixed effects analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020;74(1):48–56. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2019-212704 .
doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-212704
pubmed: 31630120
Šiljeg S, Marić I, Nikolić G, Šiljeg A. Accessibility analysis of urban green spaces in the settlement of Zadar in Croatia. Sumar List. 2018;142(910):487–96. https://doi.org/10.31298/sl.142.9-10.4 .
doi: 10.31298/sl.142.9-10.4
Yang M, Dijst M, Faber J, Helbich M. Using structural equation modeling to examine pathways between perceived residential green space and mental health among internal migrants in China. Environ Res. 2020;183:109121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109121 .
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109121
pubmed: 32006771
van Dillen SME, De Vries S, Groenewegen PP, Spreeuwenberg P. Greenspace in urban neighbourhoods and residents’ health: adding quality to quantity. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(6):e8. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.104695 .
doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.104695
pubmed: 21715445
Yakınlar N, Akpınar A. How perceived sensory dimensions of urban green spaces are associated with adults’ perceived restoration, stress, and mental health? Urban For Urban Green. 2022;72:127572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127572 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127572
Sun P, Song Y, Lu W. Effect of urban green space in the hilly environment on physical activity and health outcomes: mediation analysis on multiple greenery measures. Land. 2022;11(5):612. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11050612 .
doi: 10.3390/land11050612
Xu J, Wang F, Chen L, Zhang W. Perceived urban green and residents’ health in Beijing. SSM-Popul Health. 2021;14:100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100790 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100790
pubmed: 33948479
pmcid: 8080077
Huang S, Qi J, Li W, Dong J, van den Bosch CK. The contribution to stress recovery and attention restoration potential of exposure to urban green spaces in low-density residential areas. Int J Environ Res. 2021;18(16):8713. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168713 .
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168713
Knobel P, Dadvand P, Alonso L, Costa L, Español M, Maneja R. Development of the urban green space quality assessment tool (RECITAL). Urban For Urban Green. 2020;57:126895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126895 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126895
Wang S, Yung EHK, Sun Y. Effects of open space accessibility and quality on older adults’ visit: planning towards equal right to the city. Cities. 2022;125:103611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103611 .
doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103611
Edwards N, Hooper P, Trapp GSA, Bull F, Boruff B, Giles-Corti B. Development of a Public Open Space Desktop Auditing Tool (POSDAT): a remote sensing approach. Appl Geogr. 2013;38:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.11.010 .
doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.11.010
Timperio A, Giles-Corti B, Crawford D, Andrianopoulos N, Ball K, Salmon J, Hume C. Features of public open spaces and physical activity among children: findings from the CLAN study. Prev Med. 2008;47(5):514–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.07.015 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.07.015
pubmed: 18718847
Stoltz J, Grahn P. Perceived sensory dimensions: an evidence-based approach to greenspace aesthetics. Urban For Urban Green. 2021;59:126989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.126989 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.126989
Wang R, Jiang W, Lu T. Landscape characteristics of university campus in relation to aesthetic quality and recreational preference. Urban For Urban Green. 2021;66:127389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127389 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127389
Knapp M, Gustat J, Darensbourg R, Myers L, Johnson C. The relationships between park quality, park usage, and levels of physical activity in low-income, African American neighborhoods. Int J Environ Res. 2018;16(1):85. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16010085 .
doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010085
Lo AYH, Jim RY. Differential community effects on perception and use of urban greenspaces. Cities. 2010;27(6):430–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2010.07.001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2010.07.001
Wood E, Harsant A, Dallimer M, Cronin DCA, McEachan R, Hassall C. Not all green space is created equal: biodiversity predicts psychological restorative benefits from urban green space. Front Psychol. 2018;9:2320. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02320 .
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02320
pubmed: 30538653
pmcid: 6277587
Southon GE, Jorgensen A, Dunnett N, Hoyle H, Evans KL. Perceived species-richness in urban green spaces: cues, accuracy and well-being impacts. Landsc Urban Plan. 2018;172:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.002
Whitehouse S, Varni JW, Seid M, Cooper-Marcus C, Ensberg MJ, Jacobs JR, Mehlenbeck RS. Evaluating a children’s hospital garden environment: utilization and consumer satisfaction. J Environ Psychol. 2001;21(3):301–14.
doi: 10.1006/jevp.2001.0224
Wood L, Hooper P, Foster S, Bull F. Public green spaces and positive mental health - investigating the relationship between access, quantity and types of parks and mental wellbeing. Health Place. 2017;48:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.09.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.09.002
pubmed: 28942343
Khan AZ, Moulaert F, Schreurs J. Understanding spatial quality: a relational epistemology and transdisciplinary perspectives in planning and urban design: JUD Special issue. 2014; 19:393-510
Knobel P, Dadvand P, Maneja-Zaragoza R. A systematic review of multi-dimensional quality assessment tools for urban green spaces. Health Place. 2019;59:102198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102198 .
doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102198
pubmed: 31525616
Liu Q, Luo S, Shen Y, Zhu Z, Yao X, Li Q, Tarin MWK, Zheng J, Zhuo Z. Relationships between students’ demographic characteristics, perceived naturalness and patterns of use associated with campus green space, and self-rated restoration and health. Urban For Urban Green. 2022;68:127474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127474 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127474
Ochodo C, Ndetei DM, Moturi WN, Otieno JO. External Built residential environment characteristics that affect mental health of adults. J Urban Health. 2014;91(5):908–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-013-9852-5 .
doi: 10.1007/s11524-013-9852-5
pubmed: 24464242
pmcid: 4199438
Roberts M, Irvine KN, McVittie A. Associations between greenspace and mental health prescription rates in urban areas. Urban For Urban Green. 2021;64:127301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127301 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127301
Abdul Aziz NA, Shian LY, Mokhtar MDM, Raman TL, Saikim FH, Chen W, Nordin NM. Effectiveness of urban green space on undergraduates’ stress relief in tropical city: a field experiment in Kuala Lumpur. Urban For Urban Green. 2021;63:127236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127236 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127236
Ayala-Azcárraga C, Diaz D, Zambrano L. Characteristics of urban parks and their relation to user well-being. Landsc Urban Plan. 2019;189:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.005 .
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.005
Yen H, Chiu H, Huang H. Green and blue physical activity for quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Landsc Urban Plan. 2021;212:104093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104093 .
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104093
van den Berg M, van Poppel M, Smith G, Triguero-Mas M, Andrusaityte S, van Kamp I, van Mechelen W, Gidlow C, Gražulevičiene R, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, et al. Does time spent on visits to green space mediate the associations between the level of residential greenness and mental health? Urban For Urban Green. 2017;25:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.04.010 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.04.010
van den Berg M, van Poppel M, van Kamp I, Andrusaityte S, Balseviciene B, Cirach M, Danileviciute A, Ellis N, Hurst G, Masterson D, et al. Visiting green space is associated with mental health and vitality: a cross-sectional study in four european cities. Health Place. 2016;38:8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.01.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.01.003
pubmed: 26796323
van den Berg MM, van Poppel M, van Kamp I, Ruijsbroek A, Triguero-Mas M, Gidlow C, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Gražulevičiene R, van Mechelen W, Kruize H, et al. Do physical activity, social cohesion, and loneliness mediate the association between time spent visiting green space and mental health? Environ Behav. 2017;51(2):144–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517738563 .
doi: 10.1177/0013916517738563
pubmed: 30662076
pmcid: 6311621
White MP, Elliott LR, Grellier J, Economou T, Bell S, Bratman GN, Cirach M, Gascon M, Lima ML, Lõhmus M, et al. Associations between green/blue spaces and mental health across 18 countries. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):8903. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87675-0 .
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87675-0
pubmed: 33903601
pmcid: 8076244
Coldwell DF, Evans KL. Visits to urban green-space and the countryside associate with different components of mental well-being and are better predictors than perceived or actual local urbanisation intensity. Landsc Urban Plan. 2018;175:114–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.02.007 .
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.02.007
Maury-Mora M, Gómez-Villarino MT, Varela-Martínez C. Urban green spaces and stress during COVID-19 lockdown: a case study for the city of Madrid. Urban For Urban Green. 2022;69:127492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127492 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127492
pubmed: 35153643
pmcid: 8824305
Zhang J, Cui J, Astell-Burt T, Shi W, Peng J, Lei L, Xin X, Zhang J, Feng X, Jiang Y, et al. Weekly green space visit duration is positively associated with favorable health outcomes in people with hypertension: evidence from Shenzhen. China Environ Res. 2022;212:113228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113228 .
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113228
pubmed: 35398313
Veit CT, Ware JE. The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general populations. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51(5):730–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.51.5.730 .
doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.51.5.730
pubmed: 6630688
Hotelling H. Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika. 1936;28(3/4):321–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333955 .
doi: 10.2307/2333955
Chen Y, Xu Z, Byrne J, Xu T, Wang S, Wu J. Can smaller parks limit green gentrification? Insights from Hangzhou. China Urban For Urban Green. 2021;59:127009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127009 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127009
Borga M. Canonical Correlation a Tutorial. 2001:1–12
Marubayashi Hidalgo A, Pinheiro Da Silva L, Reis Mota R, Nunes Martins E. Canonical-correlation analysis applied to selection-index methodology in quails. Livest Sci. 2014;169:35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.09.021 .
doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2014.09.021
Zhang J, Tan PY. Demand for parks and perceived accessibility as key determinants of urban park use behavior. Urban For Urban Green. 2019;44:126420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126420 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126420
McCormack GR, Cerin E, Leslie E, Du Toit L, Owen N. Objective versus perceived walking distances to destinations: correspondence and predictive validity. Environ Behav. 2007;40(3):401–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507300560 .
doi: 10.1177/0013916507300560
Wang D, Brown G, Liu Y. The physical and non-physical factors that influence perceived access to urban parks. Landsc Urban Plan. 2015;133:53–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.007 .
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.007
Fisher JC, Irvine KN, Bicknell JE, Hayes WM, Davies ZG. Perceived biodiversity, sound, naturalness and safety enhance the restorative quality and wellbeing benefits of green and blue space in a neotropical city. Sci Total Environ. 2020;755:143095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143095 .
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143095
pubmed: 33139002
Wang R, Zhao J, Meitner MJ, Hu Y, Xu X. Characteristics of urban green spaces in relation to aesthetic preference and stress recovery. Urban For Urban Green. 2019;41:6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.005 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.005
Garza Aguilar JA. Manual de Procedimientos de Control de Fauna Nocina Urbana. Coahuila, México: Universidad Autonoma Agraria Antonio Narro; 2010.
Misiune I, Julian JP, Veteikis D. Pull and push factors for use of urban green spaces and priorities for their ecosystem services: case study of Vilnius. Lithuania Urban For Urban Green. 2021;58:126899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126899 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126899
Päcke SR, Figueroa Aldunce IM. Distribución, superficie y accesibilidad de las áreas verdes en Santiago de Chile. 2010; 36(109):89-110
Kothencz G, Kolcsár R, Cabrera-Barona P, Szilassi P. Urban green space perception and its contribution to well-being. Int J Environ Res. 2017;14(7):766. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070766 .
doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070766
Stessens P, Canters F, Huysmans M, Khan AZ. Urban green space qualities: an integrated approach towards GIS-based assessment reflecting user perception. Land Use Pol. 2020;91:104319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104319 .
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104319
Annear MJ, Cushman G, Gidlow B. Leisure time physical activity differences among older adults from diverse socioeconomic neighborhoods. Health Place. 2009;15(2):482–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.09.005 .
doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.09.005
pubmed: 19038571