Social Support Among Women With Potential Essure-Related Complaints: Analysis of Facebook Group Content.

Essure Facebook patient online communities social media social networks social support sterilization

Journal

JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 03 08 2021
accepted: 31 03 2023
revised: 01 03 2022
medline: 3 8 2023
pubmed: 3 8 2023
entrez: 3 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Social support groups are an important resource for people to cope with problems. Previous studies have reported the different types of support in these groups, but little is known about the type of reactions that sharing of personal experiences induce among members. It is important to know how and to what extent members of support groups influence each other regarding the consumption of medical care. We researched this in a web-based Facebook group of women sterilized with Essure. Essure was a device intended for permanent contraception. From 2015 onward, women treated with Essure for tubal occlusion raised safety concerns and numerous complaints. This study aimed to evaluate the use of social support in a Facebook community named "Essure problemen Nederland" (EPN; in English, "Essure problems in the Netherlands"). All posts in the closed Facebook group EPN between March 8 and May 8, 2018, were included. In total, 3491 Facebook posts were analyzed using a modified version of the Social Support Behavior Codes framework created by Cutrona and Suhr in 1992. Posts were abstracted and aggregated into a database. Two investigators evaluated the posts, developed a modified version of the Social Support Behavior Codes framework, and applied the codes to the collected data. We found that 92% of messages contained a form of social support. In 68.8% of posts, social support was provided, and in 31.2% of posts, social support was received. Informational and emotional support was the most frequently used form of provided social support (40.6% and 55.5%, respectively). The same distribution was seen with received social support: informational support in 81.5% and emotional support in 17.4% of cases. Our analysis showed a strong correlation between providing or receiving social support and the main form of social support (P<.001). In a total of only 74 (2.2%) cases, women advised each other to seek medical care. The main purpose of women in the EPN Facebook group was to provide and receive informational or emotional support or both.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Social support groups are an important resource for people to cope with problems. Previous studies have reported the different types of support in these groups, but little is known about the type of reactions that sharing of personal experiences induce among members. It is important to know how and to what extent members of support groups influence each other regarding the consumption of medical care. We researched this in a web-based Facebook group of women sterilized with Essure. Essure was a device intended for permanent contraception. From 2015 onward, women treated with Essure for tubal occlusion raised safety concerns and numerous complaints.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to evaluate the use of social support in a Facebook community named "Essure problemen Nederland" (EPN; in English, "Essure problems in the Netherlands").
METHODS METHODS
All posts in the closed Facebook group EPN between March 8 and May 8, 2018, were included. In total, 3491 Facebook posts were analyzed using a modified version of the Social Support Behavior Codes framework created by Cutrona and Suhr in 1992. Posts were abstracted and aggregated into a database. Two investigators evaluated the posts, developed a modified version of the Social Support Behavior Codes framework, and applied the codes to the collected data.
RESULTS RESULTS
We found that 92% of messages contained a form of social support. In 68.8% of posts, social support was provided, and in 31.2% of posts, social support was received. Informational and emotional support was the most frequently used form of provided social support (40.6% and 55.5%, respectively). The same distribution was seen with received social support: informational support in 81.5% and emotional support in 17.4% of cases. Our analysis showed a strong correlation between providing or receiving social support and the main form of social support (P<.001). In a total of only 74 (2.2%) cases, women advised each other to seek medical care.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The main purpose of women in the EPN Facebook group was to provide and receive informational or emotional support or both.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37535412
pii: v7i1e32592
doi: 10.2196/32592
pmc: PMC10436114
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e32592

Informations de copyright

©Daniëlle van Gastel, Marjolijn L Antheunis, Kim Tenfelde, Daniëlle L van de Graaf, Marieke Geerts, Theodoor E Nieboer, Marlies Y Bongers. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 03.08.2023.

Références

Health Commun. 2018 May;33(5):628-635
pubmed: 28281790
Child Care Health Dev. 2012 Nov;38(6):870-7
pubmed: 21916931
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jun;87(3):405-10
pubmed: 22019021
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008 Jun;11(3):371-4
pubmed: 18537512
JMIR Perioper Med. 2019 Sep 26;2(2):e10728
pubmed: 33393919
Health Commun. 1999;11(2):123-51
pubmed: 16370973
Int J Med Inform. 2015 May;84(5):375-85
pubmed: 25701266
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Oct;68(2):173-8
pubmed: 17629440
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 May 1;18(3):298-304
pubmed: 21486888
Health Commun. 2017 Oct;32(10):1233-1240
pubmed: 27485860
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(12):2233-41
pubmed: 22985490
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Mar;36(3):398-409
pubmed: 19875825

Auteurs

Daniëlle van Gastel (D)

Research School GROW, University Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Marjolijn L Antheunis (ML)

Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.

Kim Tenfelde (K)

Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.

Daniëlle L van de Graaf (DL)

Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.

Marieke Geerts (M)

Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.

Theodoor E Nieboer (TE)

Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Marlies Y Bongers (MY)

Research School GROW, University Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH