From colorblind to systemic racism: Emergence of a rhetorical shift in higher education discourse in response to the murder of George Floyd.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
17
06
2022
accepted:
30
06
2023
medline:
7
8
2023
pubmed:
3
8
2023
entrez:
3
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We use topic modeling and exponential random graph models (ERGM) to analyze statements issued by Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs) (N = 356) in the United States in the aftermath of George Floyd's murder in May 2020. Prior research investigating discourse on race in IHEs demonstrates the prevalence of two paradigms. First, the ideology of 'colorblind racism' treats systemic racism-a form of racism where social, political, and economic institutions are organized in a way that disadvantages people of color-as having largely existed in the past. Consistent with this, IHE responses to prior race-related incidents on campus have emphasized individual prejudice, avoiding discussion of systemic racism. Second, 'diversity' orthodoxy, which treats race as a cultural identity and emphasizes the instrumental benefits of racial heterogeneity on campus, is commonplace in IHEs. Topic modeling of statements issued in 2020 reveals the prevalence of several themes including the systemic and enduring nature of racism in the United States, diversity orthodoxy, humanist responses reflecting rhetoric consistent with colorblind racism, and COVID-19 response strategies. ERGM reveals fragmentation in the discourse based on IHE attributes. Religiously affiliated IHEs and those located in Republican-voting states attend more to diversity and humanist discourse, and less to systemic racism. Elite IHEs, those in Democrat-voting states, and IHEs with high percentages of Black students are more focused on systemic racism. Overall, as compared to colorblind racism and diversity orthodoxy established in prior work, our analysis reveals two striking rhetorical shifts on race discourse in IHEs in the aftermath of George Floyd's murder: (1) from a colorblind ideology to discussing the systemic nature of racism in the United States, and (2) from acknowledging perpetrators but not the broader context of racism in on-campus incidents to acknowledging diffuse racism manifest in society but refraining from explicitly naming any wrongdoers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37535657
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289545
pii: PONE-D-22-17413
pmc: PMC10399877
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0289545Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Toraif et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Soc Psychol. 2012 Nov-Dec;152(6):758-74
pubmed: 23057194
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 18;16(6):e0253478
pubmed: 34143848
Science. 1968 Jan 5;159(3810):56-63
pubmed: 5634379
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Sep;16(5):903-925
pubmed: 34498526
Acad Med. 2022 Jun 1;97(6):867-875
pubmed: 35044980
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2021 Jul-Aug 01;32(4):453-466
pubmed: 34171884
Am Sociol Rev. 1965 Oct;30(5):699-714
pubmed: 5824935
Am Psychol. 2007 May-Jun;62(4):271-86
pubmed: 17516773
Am Sociol Rev. 1967 Jun;32(3):377-90
pubmed: 6046811
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 20;13(6):e0199072
pubmed: 29924820