Macroscopic lesions of maternal and fetal vascular malperfusion in stillborn placentas: Diagnosis in the absence of microscopic histopathological examination.

Lesions of maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM) and fetal vascular malperfusion (FVM) are common in placentas associated with both stillbirth and live birth. The objective of this study was to identify lesions present more commonly in stillborn placentas and those most indicative of MVM and FVM without microscopic pathologic evaluation. Data were derived from the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network. Lesions were identified according to standard protocols published previously and categorized as either MVM or FVM according to the Amsterdam Placental Workshop Group Consensus Statement and macroscopic "umbilical cord at risk" findings. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the odds of stillbirth with macroscopic findings of MVM or FVM. 595 stillbirths and 1,305 live births were analyzed. FVM lesions (85.2%) were marginally more common (though not statistically different) in stillbirths compared to MVM lesions (81.3%). Macroscopic findings of both MVM and FVM were more common in stillbirths versus livebirths (p < 0.001). Odds ratios of macroscopic MVM and FVM lesions for stillbirth, adjusted for gestational age at delivery, maternal race (minority), ethnicity (Hispanic), age, and history of hypertension or diabetes, were 1.48 (95% CI 1.30-1.69) and 1.34 (95% CI 1.18-1.53), respectively. Macroscopic features of MVM and FVM are associated with higher odds of stillbirth versus live birth even when controlled for gestational age and maternal factors, which may be a useful clue in determining the pathophysiology of these events. This information is also useful for pathologists when microscopic examination is not available.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article.