Increasing trend of endoscopic drainage utilization for the management of pancreatic pseudocyst: insights from a nationwide database.

Pancreatic pseudocyst Pancreatitis

Journal

Clinical endoscopy
ISSN: 2234-2400
Titre abrégé: Clin Endosc
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101576886

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 16 02 2023
accepted: 03 05 2023
medline: 4 8 2023
pubmed: 4 8 2023
entrez: 3 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The pancreatic pseudocyst (PP) is a type of fluid collection that typically develops as a delayed complication of acute pancreatitis. Drainage is indicated for symptomatic patients and/or associated complications, such as infection and bleeding. Drainage modalities include percutaneous, endoscopic, laparoscopic, and open drainage. This study aimed to assess trends in the utilization of different drainage modalities for treating PP from 2016 to 2020. The trends in mortality, mean length of hospital stay, and mean hospitalization costs were also assessed. The National Inpatient Sample database was used to obtain data. The variables were generated using International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnostic and procedural codes. Endoscopic drainage was the most commonly used drainage modality in 2018-2020, with an increasing trend over time (385 procedures in 2018 to 515 in 2020; p=0.003). This is associated with a decrease in the use of other drainage modalities. A decrease in the hospitalization cost for PP requiring drainage was also noted (29,318 United States dollar [USD] in 2016 to 18,087 USD in 2020, p<0.001). Endoscopic drainage is becoming the most commonly used modality for the treatment of PP in hospitals located in the US. This new trend is associated with decreasing hospitalization costs.

Sections du résumé

Background/Aims UNASSIGNED
The pancreatic pseudocyst (PP) is a type of fluid collection that typically develops as a delayed complication of acute pancreatitis. Drainage is indicated for symptomatic patients and/or associated complications, such as infection and bleeding. Drainage modalities include percutaneous, endoscopic, laparoscopic, and open drainage. This study aimed to assess trends in the utilization of different drainage modalities for treating PP from 2016 to 2020. The trends in mortality, mean length of hospital stay, and mean hospitalization costs were also assessed.
Methods UNASSIGNED
The National Inpatient Sample database was used to obtain data. The variables were generated using International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnostic and procedural codes.
Results UNASSIGNED
Endoscopic drainage was the most commonly used drainage modality in 2018-2020, with an increasing trend over time (385 procedures in 2018 to 515 in 2020; p=0.003). This is associated with a decrease in the use of other drainage modalities. A decrease in the hospitalization cost for PP requiring drainage was also noted (29,318 United States dollar [USD] in 2016 to 18,087 USD in 2020, p<0.001).
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Endoscopic drainage is becoming the most commonly used modality for the treatment of PP in hospitals located in the US. This new trend is associated with decreasing hospitalization costs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37536745
pii: ce.2023.054
doi: 10.5946/ce.2023.054
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Khaled Elfert (K)

Department of Internal Medicine, SBH Health System, New York, NY, USA.

Salomon Chamay (S)

Department of Internal Medicine, SBH Health System, New York, NY, USA.

Lamin Dos Santos (LD)

Department of Internal Medicine, SBH Health System, New York, NY, USA.

Mouhand Mohamed (M)

Department of Internal Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Azizullah Beran (A)

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Fouad Jaber (F)

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.

Hazem Abosheaishaa (H)

Department of Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Queens, NY, USA.

Suresh Nayudu (S)

Division of Gastroenterology, SBH Health System, New York, NY, USA.

Sammy Ho (S)

Division of Gastroenterology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

Classifications MeSH