Occupational burnout, flourishing and job satisfaction among HIV/AIDS healthcare workers in Western China: a network analysis.
Flourishing
Healthcare workers
Job satisfaction
Network analysis
Occupational burnout
Journal
BMC psychiatry
ISSN: 1471-244X
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968559
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 08 2023
03 08 2023
Historique:
received:
19
04
2023
accepted:
14
06
2023
medline:
7
8
2023
pubmed:
4
8
2023
entrez:
3
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Healthcare workers suffered with high prevalence of occupational burnout, which might be related with their job satisfaction and well-being. This study aimed to provide evidence of complex interrelations among occupational burnout, flourishing, and job satisfaction, and identify key variables from the perspective of network structure among healthcare workers. A cross-sectional study was conducted between July and October 2021, and 907 (the response rate was 98.4%) HIV/AIDS healthcare workers completed their sociodemographic characteristics, occupational burnout, flourishing and job satisfaction. Network analysis was conducted to investigate the interrelations of occupational burnout, flourishing, and job satisfaction communities, and identify central variables and bridges connecting different communities with different bridge strength thresholds in the network structure. The Network Comparison Test (NCT) was conducted to examine the gender differences in networks. In the network, feeling exhausted at work (strength: 1.42) and feeling frustrated at work (1.27) in occupational burnout community, and interested in daily activities (1.32) in flourishing community were central variables. Bridges in the network were job reward satisfaction (bridge strength: 0.31), satisfaction with job itself (0.25), and job environment satisfaction (0.19) in job satisfaction community, as well as interested in daily activities (0.29) and feeling respectable (0.18) in flourishing community, with bridges selected with top 20% bridge strengths. Feeling frustrated at work (0.14) in occupational burnout community and leading a purposeful and meaningful life (0.11) in flourishing community became bridges when using thresholds of top 25% and 30% bridge strengths, respectively. We also observed higher network densities in females (network density: 0.37) than that in males (0.34), and gender differences in the distribution of partial correlation coefficients (M = 0.27, P = 0.017). In the network structure of occupational burnout-flourishing-job satisfaction, feeling frustrated at work in occupational burnout community and interested in daily activities in flourishing community were both central variables and bridges, which may be targeted variables to intervene to alleviate the overall level of symptoms in the network and therefore prevent poor health outcomes in healthcare workers.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Healthcare workers suffered with high prevalence of occupational burnout, which might be related with their job satisfaction and well-being. This study aimed to provide evidence of complex interrelations among occupational burnout, flourishing, and job satisfaction, and identify key variables from the perspective of network structure among healthcare workers.
METHODS
A cross-sectional study was conducted between July and October 2021, and 907 (the response rate was 98.4%) HIV/AIDS healthcare workers completed their sociodemographic characteristics, occupational burnout, flourishing and job satisfaction. Network analysis was conducted to investigate the interrelations of occupational burnout, flourishing, and job satisfaction communities, and identify central variables and bridges connecting different communities with different bridge strength thresholds in the network structure. The Network Comparison Test (NCT) was conducted to examine the gender differences in networks.
RESULTS
In the network, feeling exhausted at work (strength: 1.42) and feeling frustrated at work (1.27) in occupational burnout community, and interested in daily activities (1.32) in flourishing community were central variables. Bridges in the network were job reward satisfaction (bridge strength: 0.31), satisfaction with job itself (0.25), and job environment satisfaction (0.19) in job satisfaction community, as well as interested in daily activities (0.29) and feeling respectable (0.18) in flourishing community, with bridges selected with top 20% bridge strengths. Feeling frustrated at work (0.14) in occupational burnout community and leading a purposeful and meaningful life (0.11) in flourishing community became bridges when using thresholds of top 25% and 30% bridge strengths, respectively. We also observed higher network densities in females (network density: 0.37) than that in males (0.34), and gender differences in the distribution of partial correlation coefficients (M = 0.27, P = 0.017).
CONCLUSIONS
In the network structure of occupational burnout-flourishing-job satisfaction, feeling frustrated at work in occupational burnout community and interested in daily activities in flourishing community were both central variables and bridges, which may be targeted variables to intervene to alleviate the overall level of symptoms in the network and therefore prevent poor health outcomes in healthcare workers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37537528
doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04959-7
pii: 10.1186/s12888-023-04959-7
pmc: PMC10398953
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
560Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2007 Jun;4(2):93-100
pubmed: 17617671
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Dec 22;13(1):ijerph13010030
pubmed: 26703667
Am Psychol. 2007 Feb-Mar;62(2):95-108
pubmed: 17324035
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jan 15;21(1):12
pubmed: 31941455
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 30;11(1):557
pubmed: 34718326
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 21;7(6):e015141
pubmed: 28637730
JAMA. 2018 Sep 18;320(11):1131-1150
pubmed: 30326495
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Sep;36(9):1020-2
pubmed: 26814876
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 24;14(9):e0222638
pubmed: 31550281
Multivariate Behav Res. 2021 Mar-Apr;56(2):353-367
pubmed: 31179765
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):270
pubmed: 32487169
Int Dent J. 2010 Dec;60(6):411-8
pubmed: 21302740
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1317-1331
pubmed: 30193239
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2018 Sep 25;6(1):301-328
pubmed: 34040834
Psychol Rep. 2019 Apr;122(2):609-631
pubmed: 29460688
AIDS Care. 1996 Apr;8(2):207-21
pubmed: 8861419
Clin Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;3(2):292-300
pubmed: 31754552
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;72(12):1219-26
pubmed: 26561400
Libyan J Med. 2010 Jan;5(1):4629
pubmed: 28156299
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 3;12(8):e0181616
pubmed: 28771502
J Affect Disord. 2022 Oct 1;314:193-200
pubmed: 35780965
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 02;8:1305
pubmed: 28824490
J Intern Med. 2018 Jun;283(6):516-529
pubmed: 29505159
BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 14;16:335
pubmed: 27079376
Psychother Psychosom. 2004 May-Jun;73(3):145-8
pubmed: 15031586
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 18;11(8):e046599
pubmed: 34408036
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 16;19(4):
pubmed: 35206440
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):195-212
pubmed: 28342071
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Oct;24(10):608-10
pubmed: 26038586
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Feb 24;14:221-231
pubmed: 33658870
J Abnorm Psychol. 2020 Jan;129(1):82-91
pubmed: 31697140
Br Dent J. 2008 Jan 12;204(1):E1; discussion 16-7
pubmed: 18084190
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Aug;33(8):588-90
pubmed: 27191922
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Aug;73(4):615-622
pubmed: 21782304
J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Jun;12(3):312-319
pubmed: 32595851
Epidemiol Health. 2016 Mar 09;38:e2016008
pubmed: 26971698
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;92:83-91
pubmed: 23849282
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Apr;50(2):853-861
pubmed: 28718088
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):137-50; discussion 150-93
pubmed: 20584369
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;105:769-775
pubmed: 33618006
Front Public Health. 2021 May 07;9:679397
pubmed: 34026720
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0192983
pubmed: 29466443
Sci Rep. 2019 May 20;9(1):7607
pubmed: 31110301
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 23;22(1):1033
pubmed: 35606769
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jan 03;8(1):
pubmed: 31947761
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2021 Apr 05;95:
pubmed: 33818557
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Apr;32(4):475-482
pubmed: 27785668
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 13;17(22):
pubmed: 33202826
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2014 Sep 13;1(2):ofu084
pubmed: 25734150
J Adv Nurs. 1999 Apr;29(4):984-93
pubmed: 10215992
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2018 Jun 08;25:52-55
pubmed: 29998182