Economic benefit of co-regulation to manage aflatoxin risk in maize.
Aflatoxin
Benefit
Blending
Co-regulation
Crop insurance
Economic
Income
Mycotoxins
Risk management
Shared governance
Journal
Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
12
04
2023
revised:
06
07
2023
accepted:
12
07
2023
medline:
4
8
2023
pubmed:
4
8
2023
entrez:
4
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Aflatoxins are toxic fungal metabolites that occur naturally in the field among cereals, oilseeds, and nuts that may increase during storage. Texas grown maize, commonly referred as corn, has some of the highest aflatoxin levels in the US. In 2011, the Office of the Texas State Chemist (OTSC) collaborated with the Risk Management Agency (RMA) of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Texas grain industry to implement the state's first co-regulation governance option to manage aflatoxin risk. Co-regulation is a form of risk management that relies upon a government-private partnership in regulation; utilizing government-backed codes of practice that result in a more connected and transparent marketplace. To measure the economic benefit of co-regulation to manage aflatoxin risk, interviews were conducted among twenty-seven participants in the OTSC aflatoxin co-regulation program who represented 31% of the grain companies that handled maize contaminated by aflatoxin according to Texas Commercial Feed Rules. A comparative approach was used by gathering evidence from 2010 to 2018, in order to evaluate the results before and after the OTSC implemented its co-regulation strategy. The results were evaluated by using the data gathered from the interviews to measure the specific costs and benefits incurred by producers and grain handlers. The findings were modeled in the form of an income statement. From the income statement, the total economic benefit of the One Sample Strategy in 2018 was $14,572,180. This study provides a more realistic characterization of cost drivers associated with aflatoxin risk management and counters exaggerated economic losses associated with aflatoxin in maize from prior studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37539128
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18254
pii: S2405-8440(23)05462-2
pmc: PMC10395466
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e18254Informations de copyright
© 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Timothy Herrman, Kelsey Postma, and Mary Sasser are employed, or have been employed, by the Office of the Texas State Chemist, which oversaw the implementation and administration of the Feed and Fertilizer Control Service’s One Sample Strategy, the primary subject of this paper. As authors, we are reporting on our work regulating aflatoxin contamination. This statement serves as a disclosure of any possible conflicts of interests resulting from such employment.
Références
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2016;33(3):540-50
pubmed: 26807606
J Food Prot. 2018 Apr;81(4):554-560
pubmed: 29513107
J Food Prot. 2020 Jan;83(1):142-146
pubmed: 31855611