The impact of targeted interventions aimed to improve quality of life in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition: A systematic literature review.
cellular and physiological function
nutritional strategies
parenteral nutrition
quality of life
study design and analysis
systematic review
Journal
Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association
ISSN: 1365-277X
Titre abrégé: J Hum Nutr Diet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8904840
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2023
10 2023
Historique:
received:
16
04
2023
accepted:
01
08
2023
medline:
22
9
2023
pubmed:
4
8
2023
entrez:
4
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is a specialised therapy offered to people suffering from intestinal failure. Underlying disease, HPN complications and limitations of HPN can significantly impact a person's quality-of-life (QOL). The aim of this review was to evaluate the evidence on existing non-surgical/non-pharmacological interventions aimed at improving QOL, clinical, patient-reported and economic outcomes for patients receiving parenteral nutrition therapy at home across adult and paediatric settings. Online databases Medline (Ovid), Embase and Cinahl were searched to identify studies published between 1937 and 31 March 2022. Identified studies were appraised using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment. Nine studies were included in this review. Interventions were focused on education (n = 4), telemedicine (n = 2), preparation of infusion mixtures (n = 1), mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (n = 1) and a multi-modal approach (n = 1). Only one study measured QOL before and after the intervention using a validated QOL tool. All studies were assessed at either some, high or critical risk of bias, resulting in low or very low-quality evidence for the interventions evaluated. The findings from this review highlight the lack of high-quality non-surgical/non-pharmacological studies seeking to improve QOL for people on HPN. Because the majority of people receiving HPN are not eligible for surgical or pharmaceutical treatments, higher quality research using clinical trial design, and research focused on improving QOL is needed to inform healthcare managers about the effectiveness (and value) of alternative service delivery models for this vulnerable patient group.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is a specialised therapy offered to people suffering from intestinal failure. Underlying disease, HPN complications and limitations of HPN can significantly impact a person's quality-of-life (QOL). The aim of this review was to evaluate the evidence on existing non-surgical/non-pharmacological interventions aimed at improving QOL, clinical, patient-reported and economic outcomes for patients receiving parenteral nutrition therapy at home across adult and paediatric settings.
METHODS
Online databases Medline (Ovid), Embase and Cinahl were searched to identify studies published between 1937 and 31 March 2022. Identified studies were appraised using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment.
RESULTS
Nine studies were included in this review. Interventions were focused on education (n = 4), telemedicine (n = 2), preparation of infusion mixtures (n = 1), mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (n = 1) and a multi-modal approach (n = 1). Only one study measured QOL before and after the intervention using a validated QOL tool. All studies were assessed at either some, high or critical risk of bias, resulting in low or very low-quality evidence for the interventions evaluated.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings from this review highlight the lack of high-quality non-surgical/non-pharmacological studies seeking to improve QOL for people on HPN. Because the majority of people receiving HPN are not eligible for surgical or pharmaceutical treatments, higher quality research using clinical trial design, and research focused on improving QOL is needed to inform healthcare managers about the effectiveness (and value) of alternative service delivery models for this vulnerable patient group.
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1741-1750Informations de copyright
© 2023 State of New South Wales. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Dietetic Association.
Références
Pironi L, Arends J, Bozzetti F, Cuerda C, Gillanders L, Jeppesen PB, et al. ESPEN guidelines on chronic intestinal failure in adults. Clin Nutr. 2016;35(2):247-307.
Staun M, Pironi L, Bozzetti F, Baxter J, Forbes A, Joly F, et al. ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: Home Parenteral Nutrition (HPN) in adult patients. Clin Nutr. 2009;28:467-479.
Winkler MF, Hagan E, Wetle T, Smith C, Maillet JO, Touger-Decker R. An exploration of quality of life and the experience of living with home parenteral nutrition. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010;34:395-407.
Sowerbutts AM, Jones D, Lal S, Burden S. Quality of life in patients and in family members of those receiving home parenteral support with intestinal failure: a systematic review. Clin Nutr. 2021;40:3210-3220.
Chen C, Zhu D, Zhao Z, Ye X. Quality of life assessment instruments in adult patients receiving home parenteral and enteral nutrition: a scoping review. Nutr Clin Pract. 2022;37:811-824.
Baxter JP, Fayers PM, Bozzetti F, Kelly D, Joly F, Wanten G, et al. An international study of the quality of life of adult patients treated with Home Parenteral Nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2019;38:1788-1796.
Tsang PY, Carey S. Impact of Home Parenteral Nutrition on daily life: a qualitative study of eight patients: qualitative nutrition and HPN. Nutr Diet. 2015;72:16-21.
Pittiruti M, Hamilton H, Biffi R, MacFie J, Pertkiewicz M. ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition: central venous catheters (access, care, diagnosis and therapy of complications). Clin Nutr. 2009;28:365-377.
Dashti HS, Godbole M, Chen A, Mogensen KM, Leong A, Burns DL, et al. Sleep patterns of patients receiving home parenteral nutrition: a home-based observational study. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2022;46:1699-1708.
Winkler MF, Smith CE. The impact of long-term home parenteral nutrition on the patient and the family: achieving normalcy in life. J Infus Nurs. 2015;38(38):290-300.
Schliefert E, Carey S. Nutritional status and quality of life in a cohort of Australian Home Parenteral Nutrition patients: a pilot study: nutrition and QoL in HPN. Nutr Diet. 2014;71:79-85.
Bharadwaj S, Tandon P, Gohel TD, Brown J, Steiger E, Kirby DF, et al. Current status of intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2017;5:gow045.
Seidner DL, Fujioka K, Boullata JI, Iyer K, Lee HM, Ziegler TR. Reduction of parenteral nutrition and hydration support and safety with long-term teduglutide treatment in patients with short bowel syndrome-associated intestinal failure: STEPS-3 study. Nutr Clin Pract. 2018;33:520-527.
Chen K, Mu F, Xie J, Kelkar SS, Olivier C, Signorovitch J, et al. Impact of teduglutide on quality of life among patients with short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2020;44:119-128.
Joly F, Quilliot D, Chambrier C, Schneider S, Fotsing G, Poullenot F, et al. Equative: quality of life in adult patients with short bowel syndrome treated by teduglutide, a French real-world study. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021;46:S665.
Holdaway L, Loo L, Smith A, Vokes LS, Vaidya A, Travis SPL, et al. Intestinal transplant improves quality of life for patients with chronic intestinal failure. Transplantation. 2017;101:S94.
Solar H, Ortega M, Gondolesi GE. Quality of life after intestinal transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2021;26:200-206.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Online). 2021;372:n71.
Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, Hayward RS. The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club. 1995;123:A12-A13.
Sasseville M, Chouinard M-C, Fortin M. Understanding patient outcomes to develop a multimorbidity adapted patient-reported outcomes measure: a qualitative description of patient and provider perspectives. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021;19:43.
Kingsley C, Patel S. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Edu. 2017;17:137-144.
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.
Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919.
Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328:1490.
Drews B, Macaluso M, Piper H, Channabasappa N. Caregiver education reduces the incidence of community-acquired CLABSIs in the pediatric patient with intestinal failure. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2017;40(6):458-462.
Emery D, Pearson A, Lopez R, Hamilton C, Albert NM. Voiceover interactive powerpoint catheter care education for home parenteral nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015;30(5):714-719.
Pierik A, Martins DS, Casey L, Piper HG. Use of instructional videos to reduce central venous catheter complications in children with intestinal failure receiving Home Parenteral Nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract. 2021;36(4):872-876.
Smith C, Curtas S, Kleinbeck S, Werkowitch M, Mosier M, Seidner D, et al. Clinical trial of interactive and videotaped educational interventions reduce infection, reactive depression, and rehospitalizations for sepsis in patients on Home Parenteral Nutrition. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003;27(2):137-145.
Chambers A, Hennessy E, Powell-Tuck J. Longitudinal trends in quality of life after starting Home Parenteral Nutrition: a randomised controlled study of telemedicine. Clin Nutr. 2006;25(3):505-514.
Cloutier A, Bond A, Taylor MI, Ablett J, Teubner A, Farrer K, et al. Successful implementation of remote video consultations for patients receiving Home Parenteral Nutrition. Gut. 2018;67(Suppl 1):A230-A231.
Friedman-Gruszczyńska J, Ossolińska M, Popińska K, Książyk JB. Parenteral nutrition mixtures prepared at home by trained parents are as safe as pharmacy-made mixtures: a 3-y prospective study. Nutrition. 2013;29(7-8):988-992.
Beurskens-Meijerink J, Waal GH, Wanten G. Identifying patients with benign chronic intestinal failure on Home Parenteral Nutrition in whom a psychological support intervention may improve quality of life. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021;42:400-402.
Fuchs I, Rosenbaum D, Klein I, Einhorn M, Pinsk V, Shelef Y, et al. A pilot study to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections in children from extremely low-income settings with intestinal failure-meeting the challenge. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2020;9(2):188-193.
Amaratunga H, Bostock K, Cunich M, Steffens D, Carey S. Systematic review of service improvements for home enteral tube feeding in adults. Nutr Clin Pract. 2023;38:329-339.
Flanagan S, Damery S, Combes G. The effectiveness of integrated care interventions in improving patient quality of life (QoL) for patients with chronic conditions. An overview of the systematic review evidence. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15:188.
Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA. Getting research findings into practice: closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ. 1998;317:465-468.
Cusack L, Del Mar CB, Chalmers I, Gibson E, Hoffmann TC. Educational interventions to improve people's understanding of key concepts in assessing the effects of health interventions: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):68.
Winkler MF, Machan JT, Xue Z, Compher C. Home Parenteral Nutrition patient-reported outcome questionnaire: sensitive to quality of life differences among chronic and prolonged acute intestinal failure patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2021;45(7):1475-1483.
Drummond MFSG, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 4th ed. England: Oxford University Press; 2015.
French SD, Green SE, O'Connor DA, McKenzie JE, Francis JJ, Michie S, et al. Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7:38.
Baxter JP, Fayers PM, McKinlay AW. The clinical and psychometric validation of a questionnaire to assess the quality of life of adult patients treated with long-term parenteral nutrition. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010;34(2):131-142.
Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727-1736.
Campbell M. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000;321:694-696.