The role of sample preparation in suspect and non-target screening for exposome analysis using human urine.
Exposome
Liquid-chromatography coupled to high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS)
Phase II metabolites
Sample preparation
Suspect and non-target screening (SNTS)
Urine
Journal
Chemosphere
ISSN: 1879-1298
Titre abrégé: Chemosphere
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0320657
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
10
06
2023
revised:
18
07
2023
accepted:
30
07
2023
medline:
24
8
2023
pubmed:
5
8
2023
entrez:
4
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The use of suspect and non-target screening (SNTS) for the characterization of the chemical exposome employing human biofluids is gaining attention. Among the biofluids, urine is one of the preferred matrices since organic xenobiotics are excreted through it after metabolization. However, achieving a consensus between selectivity (i.e. preserving as many compounds as possible) and sensitivity (i.e. minimizing matrix effects by removing interferences) at the sample preparation step is challenging. Within this context, several sample preparation approaches, including solid-phase extraction (SPE), liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), salt-assisted LLE (SALLE) and dilute-and-shoot (DS) were tested to screen not only exogenous compounds in human urine but also their phase II metabolites using liquid-chromatography coupled to high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS). Additionally, enzymatic hydrolysis of phase II metabolites was evaluated. Under optimal conditions, SPE resulted in the best sample preparation approach in terms of the number of detected xenobiotics and metabolites since 97.1% of the total annotated suspects were present in samples extracted by SPE. In LLE and SALLE, pure ethyl acetate turned out to be the best extractant but fewer suspects than with SPE (80.7%) were screened. Lastly, only 52.5% of the suspects were annotated in the DS approach, showing that it could only be used to detect compounds at high concentration levels. Using pure standards, the presence of diverse xenobiotics such as parabens, industrial chemicals (benzophenone-3, caprolactam and mono-2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl phthalate) and chemicals related to daily habits (caffeine, cotinine or triclosan) was confirmed. Regarding enzymatic hydrolysis, only 10 parent compounds of the 44 glucuronides were successfully annotated in the hydrolysed samples. Therefore, the screening of metabolites in non-hydrolysed samples through SNTS is the most suitable approach for exposome characterization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37541438
pii: S0045-6535(23)01957-4
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139690
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Xenobiotics
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
139690Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.