Identifying predictors of resilience to stressors in single-arm studies of pre-post change.

Baseline Causal inference Control group Effect modification Mathematical coupling Regression to the mean

Journal

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)
ISSN: 1468-4357
Titre abrégé: Biostatistics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100897327

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 02 08 2022
revised: 07 07 2023
accepted: 10 07 2023
medline: 6 8 2023
pubmed: 6 8 2023
entrez: 5 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Many older adults experience a major stressor at some point in their lives. The ability to recover well after a major stressor is known as resilience. An important goal of geriatric research is to identify factors that influence resilience to stressors. Studies of resilience in older adults are typically conducted with a single-arm where everyone experiences the stressor. The simplistic approach of regressing change versus baseline yields biased estimates due to mathematical coupling and regression to the mean (RTM). We develop a method to correct the bias. We extend the method to include covariates. Our approach considers a counterfactual control group and involves sensitivity analyses to evaluate different settings of control group parameters. Only minimal distributional assumptions are required. Simulation studies demonstrate the validity of the method. We illustrate the method using a large, registry of older adults (N  =7239) who underwent total knee replacement (TKR). We demonstrate how external data can be utilized to constrain the sensitivity analysis. Naive analyses implicated several treatment effect modifiers including baseline function, age, body-mass index (BMI), gender, number of comorbidities, income, and race. Corrected analysis revealed that baseline (pre-stressor) function was not strongly linked to recovery after TKR and among the covariates, only age and number of comorbidities were consistently and negatively associated with post-stressor recovery in all functional domains. Correction of mathematical coupling and RTM is necessary for drawing valid inferences regarding the effect of covariates and baseline status on pre-post change. Our method provides a simple estimator to this end.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37542423
pii: 7237552
doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxad018
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : UH2AG056933
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. [br]For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Ravi Varadhan (R)

Quantitative Sciences Division, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 550 N. Broadway Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 N. Wolfe Street Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Jiafeng Zhu (J)

Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

Karen Bandeen-Roche (K)

Department of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 N. Wolfe Street Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Classifications MeSH