Quantitative measures of the resting EEG in stroke: a systematic review on clinical correlation and prognostic value.
EEG
Neurophysiology
Quantitative EEG
Rehabilitation
Stroke
Journal
Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology
ISSN: 1590-3478
Titre abrégé: Neurol Sci
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 100959175
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
27
10
2022
accepted:
26
07
2023
medline:
14
11
2023
pubmed:
6
8
2023
entrez:
5
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) has shown promising results as a predictor of clinical impairment in stroke. We systematically reviewed published papers that focus on qEEG metrics in the resting EEG of patients with mono-hemispheric stroke, to summarize current knowledge and pave the way for future research. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically searched the literature for papers that fitted our inclusion criteria. Rayyan QCRR was used to allow deduplication and collaborative blinded paper review. Due to multiple outcomes and non-homogeneous literature, a scoping review approach was used to address the topic. Or initial search (PubMed, Embase, Google scholar) yielded 3200 papers. After proper screening, we selected 71 papers that fitted our inclusion criteria and we developed a scoping review thar describes the current state of the art of qEEG in stroke. Notably, among selected papers 53 (74.3%) focused on spectral power; 11 (15.7%) focused on symmetry indexes, 17 (24.3%) on connectivity metrics, while 5 (7.1%) were about other metrics (e.g. detrended fluctuation analysis). Moreover, 42 (58.6%) studies were performed with standard 19 electrodes EEG caps and only a minority used high-definition EEG. We systematically assessed major findings on qEEG and stroke, evidencing strengths and potential pitfalls of this promising branch of research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37542545
doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06981-9
pii: 10.1007/s10072-023-06981-9
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4247-4261Informations de copyright
© 2023. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.
Références
Gorelick PB (2019) The global burden of stroke: persistent and disabling. Lancet Neurol 18:417–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30030-4
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30030-4
pubmed: 30871943
Ramon LF, Paul Nicola LM, Gray AM, Pendlebury ST, Bull LM, Welch Sarah JV et al (2013) Population-based study of disability and institutionalization after transient ischemic attack and stroke. Stroke 44:2854–61. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001584
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001584
Carrera E, Tononi G (2014) Diaschisis: past, present, future. Brain 137:2408–2422. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awu101
doi: 10.1093/brain/awu101
pubmed: 24871646
Kulikova SP, Nikulin VV, Dobrynina LA, Nazarova MA (2017) A possible sensory interpretation of alternate motor fibers relating to structural reserve during stroke recovery. Front Neurol 8:355. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00355
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00355
pubmed: 28790968
pmcid: 5524722
Xu J, Branscheidt M, Schambra H, Steiner L, Widmer M, Diedrichsen J et al (2019) Rethinking interhemispheric imbalance as a target for stroke neurorehabilitation. Ann Neurol 85:502–513. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25452
doi: 10.1002/ana.25452
pubmed: 30805956
pmcid: 7374229
Di Pino G, Pellegrino G, Assenza G, Capone F, Ferreri F, Formica D et al (2014) Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation. Nat Rev Neurol 10:597–608. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2014.162
doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.162
pubmed: 25201238
Stinear CM, Lang CE, Zeiler S, Byblow WD (2020) Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol 19:348–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30415-6
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30415-6
pubmed: 32004440
Di Pino G, Di Lazzaro V (2020) The balance recovery bimodal model in stroke patients between evidence and speculation: do recent studies support it? Clin Neurophysiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2020.07.004
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.07.004
pubmed: 32747189
Pernet CR, Martinez-Cancino R, Truong D, Makeig S, Delorme A. (2021) From BIDS-formatted EEG data to sensor-space group results: a fully reproducible workflow with EEGLAB and LIMO EEG. Front Neurosci 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.610388
Bigdely-Shamlo N, Mullen T, Kothe C, Su K-M, Robbins KA. (2015) The PREP pipeline: standardized preprocessing for large-scale EEG analysis. Front Neuroinformatics. 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2015.00016 .
Roy Y, Banville H, Albuquerque I, Gramfort A, Falk TH, Faubert J (2019) Deep learning-based electroencephalography analysis: a systematic review. J Neural Eng 16:051001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ab260c
doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab260c
pubmed: 31151119
Finnigan S, van Putten MJAM (2013) EEG in ischaemic stroke: quantitative EEG can uniquely inform (sub-)acute prognoses and clinical management. Clin Neurophysiol 124:10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2012.07.003
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.07.003
pubmed: 22858178
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
pubmed: 19621072
pmcid: 2707599
Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A (2012) Beyond PICO: The SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res 22:1435–1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312452938
doi: 10.1177/1049732312452938
pubmed: 22829486
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD et al (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928
doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928
pubmed: 22008217
pmcid: 3196245
Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Kleijnen J, Franco OH (2017) Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Syst Rev 6:245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A (2016) Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 5:210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
Jiang M, Su Y, Liu G, Chen W, Gao D (2019) Predicting the non-survival outcome of large hemispheric infarction patients via quantitative electroencephalography: superiority to visual electroencephalography and the Glasgow Coma Scale. Neurosci Lett 706:88–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2019.05.007
doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.05.007
pubmed: 31077739
Sheorajpanday RVA, Nagels G, Weeren AJTM, De Surgeloose D, De Deyn PP. (2010) Additional value of quantitative EEG in acute anterior circulation syndrome of presumed ischemic origin. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol. 121:1719–25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.10.037
Huang H, Niu Z, Liu G, Jiang M, Jia Q, Li X et al (2020) Early consciousness disorder in acute large hemispheric infarction: an analysis based on quantitative EEG and brain network characteristics. Neurocrit Care. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-01051-w
doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01051-w
pubmed: 33025542
pmcid: 9159343
Kasner SE (2006) Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurol 5:603–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70495-1
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70495-1
pubmed: 16781990
Cuspineda E, Machado C, Galán L, Aubert E, Alvarez MA, Llopis F et al (2007) QEEG prognostic value in acute stroke. Clin EEG Neurosci 38:155–160
doi: 10.1177/155005940703800312
pubmed: 17844945
Sheorajpanday RVA, Nagels G, Weeren AJTM, van Putten MJAM, De Deyn PP. (2011) Quantitative EEG in ischemic stroke: correlation with functional status after 6 months. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol. 122:874–83 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2010.07.028
Xin X, Gao Y, Zhang H, Cao K, Shi Y (2012) Correlation of continuous electroencephalogram with clinical assessment scores in acute stroke patients. Neurosci Bull 28:611–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-012-1265-z
doi: 10.1007/s12264-012-1265-z
pubmed: 22965744
pmcid: 5561917
Ajčević M, Furlanis G, Naccarato M, Miladinović A, Buoite Stella A, Caruso P et al (2021) Hyper-acute EEG alterations predict functional and morphological outcomes in thrombolysis-treated ischemic stroke: a wireless EEG study. Med Biol Eng Comput 59:121–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-020-02280-z
doi: 10.1007/s11517-020-02280-z
pubmed: 33274407
Yuasa T, Maeda A, Higuchi S, Motohashi Y (2001) Quantitative EEG data and comprehensive ADL (activities of daily living) evaluation of stroke survivors residing in the community. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci 20:37–41. https://doi.org/10.2114/jpa.20.37
doi: 10.2114/jpa.20.37
pubmed: 11320778
Vecchio F, Tomino C, Miraglia F, Iodice F, Erra C, Di Iorio R et al (2019) Cortical connectivity from EEG data in acute stroke: a study via graph theory as a potential biomarker for functional recovery. Int J Psychophysiol 146:133–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.09.012
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.09.012
pubmed: 31648028
Capon AP. (1996) Quantitative EEG with brain mapping in strokes: is it useful for prognosis?. 9:77–82.
Giaquinto S, Cobianchi A, Macera F, Nolfe G (1994) EEG recordings in the course of recovery from stroke 25:2204–2209
pubmed: 7974546
Fanciullacci C, Bertolucci F, Lamola G, Panarese A, Artoni F, Micera S et al (2017) Delta power is higher and more symmetrical in ischemic stroke patients with cortical involvement. Front Hum Neurosci 11:385
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00385
pubmed: 28804453
pmcid: 5532374
van Putten MJAM, Tavy DLJ (2004) Continuous quantitative EEG monitoring in hemispheric stroke patients using the brain symmetry index. Stroke 35:2489–2492. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000144649.49861.1d
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000144649.49861.1d
pubmed: 15472102
Sheorajpanday RVA, Nagels G, Weeren AJTM, De Deyn PP. (2011) Quantitative EEG in ischemic stroke: correlation with infarct volume and functional status in posterior circulation and lacunar syndromes. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol. 122:884–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2010.08.020 .
Finnigan SP, Rose SE, Walsh M, Griffin M, Janke AL, McMahon KL et al (2004) Correlation of quantitative EEG in acute ischemic stroke with 30-day NIHSS score: comparison with diffusion and perfusion MRI. Stroke 35:899–903. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000122622.73916.d2
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000122622.73916.d2
pubmed: 15001786
Zappasodi F, Tecchio F, Marzetti L, Pizzella V, Di Lazzaro V, Assenza G (2019) Longitudinal quantitative electroencephalographic study in mono-hemispheric stroke patients. Neural Regen Res 14:1237–1246. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.251331
doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.251331
pubmed: 30804255
pmcid: 6425833
Ajčević M, Furlanis G, Miladinović A, Buoite Stella A, Caruso P, Ukmar M et al (2021) Early EEG alterations correlate with CTP hypoperfused volumes and neurological deficit: a wireless EEG study in hyper-acute ischemic stroke. Ann Biomed Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-021-02735-w
doi: 10.1007/s10439-021-02735-w
pubmed: 33604799
pmcid: 8455382
Ajčević M, Furlanis G, Stragapede L, Ridolfi M, Caruso P, Naccarato M, et al. (2020) Brain oscillatory activity and neurological deficit in hyper-acute ischemic stroke: correlation of EEG changes with NIHSS. In: Henriques J, Neves N, de Carvalho P (eds) XV Mediterranean conference on medical and biological engineering and computing – MEDICON 2019. MEDICON 2019. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 76. Springer, Cham. 133–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31635-8_16 .
Finnigan S, Wong A, Read S (2016) Defining abnormal slow EEG activity in acute ischaemic stroke: delta/alpha ratio as an optimal QEEG index. Clin Neurophysiol 127:1452–1459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.07.014
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.07.014
pubmed: 26251106
Finnigan SP, Walsh M, Rose SE, Chalk JB (2007) Quantitative EEG indices of sub-acute ischaemic stroke correlate with clinical outcomes. Clin Neurophysiol 118:2525–2532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.07.021
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.07.021
pubmed: 17889600
Saes M, Zandvliet SB, Andringa AS, Daffertshofer A, Twisk JWR, Meskers CGM et al (2020) Is resting-state EEG longitudinally associated with recovery of clinical neurological impairments early poststroke? A prospective cohort study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 34:389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968320905797
doi: 10.1177/1545968320905797
pubmed: 32249674
Assenza G, Zappasodi F, Pasqualetti P, Vernieri F, Tecchio F (2013) A contralesional EEG power increase mediated by interhemispheric disconnection provides negative prognosis in acute stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci 31:177–188. https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-120244
doi: 10.3233/RNN-120244
pubmed: 23254689
Lanzone J, Colombo MA, Sarasso S, Zappasodi F, Rosanova M, Massimini M et al (2022) EEG spectral exponent as a synthetic index for the longitudinal assessment of stroke recovery. Clin Neurophysiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2022.02.022
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.02.022
pubmed: 36244913
pmcid: 9038588
Kawano T, Hattori N, Uno Y, Kitajo K, Hatakenaka M, Yagura H et al (2017) Large-scale phase synchrony reflects clinical status after stroke: an EEG study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 31:561–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968317697031
doi: 10.1177/1545968317697031
pubmed: 28506148
Wu W, Sun J, Jin Z, Guo X, Qiu Y, Zhu Y et al (2011) Impaired neuronal synchrony after focal ischemic stroke in elderly patients 122:21–26
Zappasodi F, Croce P, Giordani A, Assenza G, Giannantoni NM, Profice P et al (2017) Prognostic value of EEG microstates in acute stroke. Brain Topogr 30:698–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-017-0572-0
doi: 10.1007/s10548-017-0572-0
pubmed: 28547185
Singer B, Garcia-Vega J (2017) The Fugl-Meyer upper extremity scale. J Physiother 63:53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2016.08.010
doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2016.08.010
pubmed: 27964964
Chen C-C, Lee S-H, Wang W-J, Lin Y-C, Su M-C (2017) EEG-based motor network biomarkers for identifying target patients with stroke for upper limb rehabilitation and its construct validity. PloS One 12(6):e0178822. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178822 .
Wu J, Quinlan EB, Dodakian L, McKenzie A, Kathuria N, Zhou RJ et al (2015) Connectivity measures are robust biomarkers of cortical function and plasticity after stroke. Brain 138:2359–2369. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv156
doi: 10.1093/brain/awv156
pubmed: 26070983
pmcid: 4840951
Philips GR, Daly JJ, Príncipe JC (2017) Topographical measures of functional connectivity as biomarkers for post-stroke motor recovery. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 14:67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0277-3
doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0277-3
Riahi N, Vakorin VA, Menon C (2020) Estimating Fugl-Meyer upper extremity motor score from functional-connectivity measures. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 28:860–868
doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2020.2978381
pubmed: 32149693
Agius Anastasi A, Falzon O, Camilleri K, Vella M, Muscat R (2017) Brain symmetry index in healthy and stroke patients for assessment and prognosis. Stroke Res Treat 2017:8276136. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8276136
doi: 10.1155/2017/8276136
pubmed: 28251015
pmcid: 5304313
Saes M, Meskers CGM, Daffertshofer A, van Wegen EEH, Kwakkel G (2021) Are early measured resting-state EEG parameters predictive for upper limb motor impairment six months poststroke? Clin Neurophysiol 132:56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2020.09.031
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.09.031
pubmed: 33248434
Saes M, Meskers CGM, Daffertshofer A, de Munck JC, Kwakkel G, van Wegen EEH (2019) How does upper extremity Fugl-Meyer motor score relate to resting-state EEG in chronic stroke? A power spectral density analysis. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol 130:856–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2019.01.007
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.01.007
Szelies B, Mielke R, Kessler J, Heiss WD (2002) Prognostic relevance of quantitative topographical EEG in patients with poststroke aphasia. Brain Lang 82:87–94
doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00004-4
pubmed: 12174818
Iyer KK, Angwin AJ, Van Hees S, McMahon KL, Breakspear M, Copland DA (2020) Alterations to dual stream connectivity predicts response to aphasia therapy following stroke. Cortex J Devoted Study Nerv Syst Behav 125:30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.12.017
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.12.017
Schleiger E, Sheikh N, Rowland T, Wong A, Read S, Finnigan S (2014) Frontal EEG delta/alpha ratio and screening for post-stroke cognitive deficits: the power of four electrodes. Int J Psychophysiol Off J Int Organ Psychophysiol 94:19–24
Song Y, Zang D-W, Jin Y-Y, Wang Z-J, Ni H-Y, Yin J-Z et al (2015) Background rhythm frequency and theta power of quantitative EEG analysis: predictive biomarkers for cognitive impairment post-cerebral infarcts. Clin EEG Neurosci 46:142–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550059413517492
doi: 10.1177/1550059413517492
pubmed: 24699438
Schleiger E, Wong A, Read S, Rowland T, Finnigan S (2017) Poststroke QEEG informs early prognostication of cognitive impairment. Psychophysiology 54:301–309
doi: 10.1111/psyp.12785
pubmed: 28118690
Romeo Z, Mantini D, Durgoni E, Passarini L, Meneghello F, Zorzi M (2021) Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks predict cognitive deficits in stroke. Cortex 138:59–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2021.01.019
doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.01.019
pubmed: 33677328
Demeurisse G, Hublet C, Paternot J (1998) Quantitative EEG in subcortical neglect. Neurophysiol Clin Clin Neurophysiol 28:259–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0987-7053(98)80116-0
doi: 10.1016/S0987-7053(98)80116-0
Stinear CM, Byblow WD, Ackerley SJ, Smith M-C, Borges VM, Barber PA (2017) PREP2: A biomarker-based algorithm for predicting upper limb function after stroke. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 4:811–820. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.488
doi: 10.1002/acn3.488
pubmed: 29159193
pmcid: 5682112
Chiarelli AM, Croce P, Assenza G, Merla A, Granata G, Giannantoni NM et al (2020) Electroencephalography-derived prognosis of functional recovery in acute stroke through machine learning approaches. Int J Neural Syst 30:2050067. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129065720500677
doi: 10.1142/S0129065720500677
pubmed: 33236654
Gao R (2016) Interpreting the electrophysiological power spectrum. J Neurophysiol 115:628–630. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00722.2015
doi: 10.1152/jn.00722.2015
pubmed: 26245320
Fanciullacci C, Panarese A, Spina V, Lassi M, Mazzoni A, Artoni F et al (2021) Connectivity measures differentiate cortical and subcortical sub-acute ischemic stroke patients. Front Hum Neurosci 15:669915. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.669915
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.669915
pubmed: 34276326
pmcid: 8281978
Miraglia F, Tomino C, Vecchio F, Alù F, Orticoni A, Judica E et al (2021) Assessing the dependence of the number of EEG channels in the brain networks’ modulations. Brain Res Bull 167:33–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2020.11.014
doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2020.11.014
pubmed: 33242521