Editorial Commentary: The Forgotten Joint Score Is Valid, But Should Not Be Used to Compare Heterogeneous Procedures.
Journal
Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association
ISSN: 1526-3231
Titre abrégé: Arthroscopy
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8506498
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2023
09 2023
Historique:
received:
03
03
2023
accepted:
06
03
2023
medline:
7
8
2023
pubmed:
6
8
2023
entrez:
5
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patient-reported outcome measures are sometimes difficult to use. In contrast, the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is efficient and easy for patients to understand. FJS is used to assess patient awareness of joint symptoms or more specifically, as indicated by the word "forgotten," the lack thereof. Another advantage of the FJS is that it is quite discriminating compared with other patient-reported outcome measures, which may show low ceiling effects, meaning that a maximum score is easy to achieve. The FJS is valuable, but it should not be used to compare heterogeneous procedures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37543392
pii: S0749-8063(23)00235-9
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.03.005
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Editorial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2096-2097Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.