Transversus abdominis plane block versus local anesthetic infiltration for anesthetic effect in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal
Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Aug 2023
04 Aug 2023
Historique:
medline:
7
8
2023
pubmed:
6
8
2023
entrez:
6
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is commonly used in surgical practice for postoperative analgesia in abdominal surgery. However, numerous studies have demonstrated that TAP block is also suitable for intraoperative anesthesia of peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) insertion, although its efficacy and safety are still controversial. Local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) is currently the most general anesthesia strategy for PDC insertion. Consequently, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to identify which anesthesia strategy is better between TAP block and LAI. A systematic and comprehensive search was conducted on 5 databases, retrieving published and registered randomized controlled trials as of March 10, 2022, comparing the anesthesia effects of TAP block and LAI. The primary outcomes are the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score of patients at various time points in the surgery. The secondary outcomes are the VAS pain score at rest at 2 and 24 hours postoperatively, intraoperative rescue anesthesia, general anesthesia switching rate, and PD-related complications. There were 9 trials with 432 patients identified. TAP block was more effective than LAI at reducing intraoperative and postoperative VAS pain scores in patients. Compared to LAI, TAP block significantly reduces the dosage of anesthetics used to rescue anesthesia during surgery, the general anesthesia switching rate, and the incidence of postoperative PD-related complications in patients. Our systematic review and meta-analysis proved that TAP block could be used as the primary anesthetic technique for PDC insertion, with superior anesthetic effects to LAI.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is commonly used in surgical practice for postoperative analgesia in abdominal surgery. However, numerous studies have demonstrated that TAP block is also suitable for intraoperative anesthesia of peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) insertion, although its efficacy and safety are still controversial. Local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) is currently the most general anesthesia strategy for PDC insertion. Consequently, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to identify which anesthesia strategy is better between TAP block and LAI.
METHODS
METHODS
A systematic and comprehensive search was conducted on 5 databases, retrieving published and registered randomized controlled trials as of March 10, 2022, comparing the anesthesia effects of TAP block and LAI. The primary outcomes are the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score of patients at various time points in the surgery. The secondary outcomes are the VAS pain score at rest at 2 and 24 hours postoperatively, intraoperative rescue anesthesia, general anesthesia switching rate, and PD-related complications.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There were 9 trials with 432 patients identified. TAP block was more effective than LAI at reducing intraoperative and postoperative VAS pain scores in patients. Compared to LAI, TAP block significantly reduces the dosage of anesthetics used to rescue anesthesia during surgery, the general anesthesia switching rate, and the incidence of postoperative PD-related complications in patients.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our systematic review and meta-analysis proved that TAP block could be used as the primary anesthetic technique for PDC insertion, with superior anesthetic effects to LAI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37543799
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034517
pii: 00005792-202308040-00042
pmc: PMC10403017
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anesthetics, Local
0
Analgesics, Opioid
0
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e34517Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.
Références
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017 Feb;13(2):90-103
pubmed: 28029154
Perit Dial Int. 2018 May-Jun;38(3):192-199
pubmed: 29848599
J Anesth. 2016 Feb;30(1):156-60
pubmed: 26337833
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Jun;31:182-8
pubmed: 27185705
BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Dec 15;14:121
pubmed: 25580086
Perit Dial Int. 2017 Jul-Aug;37(4):429-433
pubmed: 28408712
Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):709-733
pubmed: 32061315
Trials. 2021 Apr 9;22(1):266
pubmed: 33836814
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Mar 1;118(3):424-429
pubmed: 28186223
Blood Purif. 2015;39(4):274-80
pubmed: 25925151
J Clin Anesth. 2021 Dec;75:110450
pubmed: 34243030
Anesthesiology. 2019 Nov;131(5):1166-1190
pubmed: 31283738
N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 4;385(19):1786-1795
pubmed: 34731538
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057