Compliance and Toxicity of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the OPRA Trial.
Humans
Capecitabine
Neoadjuvant Therapy
/ adverse effects
Oxaliplatin
/ adverse effects
Rectal Neoplasms
/ pathology
Fluorouracil
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ adverse effects
Chemoradiotherapy
/ adverse effects
Leucovorin
/ adverse effects
Patient Compliance
Neoplasm Staging
Treatment Outcome
Journal
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jan 2024
01 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
13
03
2023
revised:
29
06
2023
accepted:
29
07
2023
pmc-release:
01
01
2025
medline:
6
12
2023
pubmed:
7
8
2023
entrez:
6
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) may achieve organ preservation without a compromise to oncologic outcomes. However, reports on patient compliance with TNT and with treatment-related toxicities are limited. The OPRA trial assessed organ preservation rates and oncologic outcomes in patients with clinical stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma randomized to induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation (INCT-CRT) or chemoradiation followed by consolidation chemotherapy (CRT-CNCT). Systemic chemotherapy consisted of 8 cycles (16 weeks) of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or 5 cycles (15 weeks) of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPEOX). Patients received >4500 cGy of radiation with sensitizing capecitabine or fluorouracil. In this report, we compare compliance and treatment-related toxicity in patients receiving INCT-CRT versus CRT-CNCT. Additionally, we evaluate the association of compliance to chemotherapy, compliance to chemoradiation, and toxicity with organ preservation and disease-free survival (DFS). Of the 324 patients randomized, fewer patients started chemoradiation in the INCT-CRT group compared with the CRT-CNCT group (93% vs 98%, P = .03), and fewer patients started systemic chemotherapy in the CRT-CNCT group compared with the INCT-CRT group (94% vs 99%, P = .04). Order of TNT did not affect the ability to complete all intended cycles of FOLFOX (86% INCT-CRT vs 83% CRT-CNCT, P = .60) or CAPEOX (74% INCT-CRT vs 77% CRT-CNCT, P = .80). A total of 97% of INCT and 98% of CRT-CNCT patients received >4500 cGy radiation (P = .93). Sixty-four patients (41%) treated with INCT-CRT and 57 CRT-CNCT patients (34%) experienced a grade 3+ adverse event (P = .30). Compliance and toxicity were not associated with organ preservation or DFS. We identified only minor differences in treatment compliance between patients treated with INCT-CRT and CRT-CNCT. No difference in adverse events was observed between groups. Treatment compliance and toxicity did not correlate with organ preservation rates or DFS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37544412
pii: S0360-3016(23)07725-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.07.043
pmc: PMC11027192
mid: NIHMS1980153
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Capecitabine
6804DJ8Z9U
Oxaliplatin
04ZR38536J
Fluorouracil
U3P01618RT
Leucovorin
Q573I9DVLP
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
115-123Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA182551
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Cancer. 1995 Jan 1;75(1):11-7
pubmed: 7804963
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Feb 1;6(2):294-296
pubmed: 31804659
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jun 14;4(6):e180071
pubmed: 29566109
Am Fam Physician. 2015 Jan 15;91(2):93-100
pubmed: 25591210
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;37(34):3212-3222
pubmed: 31150315
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 Feb;71(2):361-70
pubmed: 23139054
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 10;28(5):859-65
pubmed: 20065174
Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2013 Sep;6(5-6):129-36
pubmed: 24312686
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Mar 15;20(6):1491-8
pubmed: 11896096
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Jun;147:75-83
pubmed: 32240909
J Clin Oncol. 1992 Jul;10(7):1171-5
pubmed: 1607921
Lancet Oncol. 2021 May;22(5):702-715
pubmed: 33862000
J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 1;26(13):2118-23
pubmed: 18445840
BMC Cancer. 2015 Oct 23;15:767
pubmed: 26497495
J Clin Oncol. 2022 May 1;40(13):1474-1486
pubmed: 35119908
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jan;22(1):29-42
pubmed: 33301740
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):957-66
pubmed: 26187751