Survival outcomes of patients treated with local therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer with high prostate-specific antigen concentrations.

high PSA nonmetastatic prostate cancer prostate-specific antigen radical prostatectomy radiotherapy survival

Journal

The Prostate
ISSN: 1097-0045
Titre abrégé: Prostate
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8101368

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2023
Historique:
revised: 25 06 2023
received: 21 04 2023
accepted: 24 07 2023
medline: 19 9 2023
pubmed: 7 8 2023
entrez: 7 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer (nmPCa) and high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels due to the high likelihood of metastasis pose a clinical dilemma regarding their optimal treatment and long-term outcomes after initial local therapy. We aimed to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT) for nmPCa with high PSA levels. We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify patients diagnosed with nmPCa who received RP or RT from 2004 through 2015. We included nmPCa patients with high PSA levels categorized as ≥50 and ≥98 ng/mL, the highest level recorded in SEER. We used the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards to analyze cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS). We included 6177 patients with nmPCa and PSA ≥ 50 ng/mL at diagnosis; 1698 (27%) had PSA ≥ 98 ng/mL. Of these, 1658 (26.8%) underwent RP and 4519 (73.16%) patients received primary RT. Within a median of 113 months (interquartile range 74-150 months), the 5- and 10-year CSS estimates were 92.3% and 81.5% respectively; 10-year OS was 61%. In the PSA ≥ 98 ng/mL subgroup 5- and 10-year CSS estimates were 89.2% and 76%, respectively. In multivariable analyses for CSS, ISUP grade group (p < 0.001), N stage (p < 0.001), treatment with RP (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.83, p < 0.001), and patient's age (p < 0.05) were associated with improved CSS. In the whole cohort of patients with PSA ≥ 50 ng/mL and RP subgroup, PSA failed to retain its independent prognostic value for CSS. Patients treated with local therapy for nmPCa with very high PSA at diagnosis have relatively good long-term oncological outcomes. Therefore, among well-selected patients with nmPCa, high PSA levels alone should not preclude the use of radical local therapy. Potential selection bias limits inferences about the relative effectiveness of specific local therapies in this setting.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer (nmPCa) and high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels due to the high likelihood of metastasis pose a clinical dilemma regarding their optimal treatment and long-term outcomes after initial local therapy. We aimed to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT) for nmPCa with high PSA levels.
METHODS
We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify patients diagnosed with nmPCa who received RP or RT from 2004 through 2015. We included nmPCa patients with high PSA levels categorized as ≥50 and ≥98 ng/mL, the highest level recorded in SEER. We used the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards to analyze cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS
We included 6177 patients with nmPCa and PSA ≥ 50 ng/mL at diagnosis; 1698 (27%) had PSA ≥ 98 ng/mL. Of these, 1658 (26.8%) underwent RP and 4519 (73.16%) patients received primary RT. Within a median of 113 months (interquartile range 74-150 months), the 5- and 10-year CSS estimates were 92.3% and 81.5% respectively; 10-year OS was 61%. In the PSA ≥ 98 ng/mL subgroup 5- and 10-year CSS estimates were 89.2% and 76%, respectively. In multivariable analyses for CSS, ISUP grade group (p < 0.001), N stage (p < 0.001), treatment with RP (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.83, p < 0.001), and patient's age (p < 0.05) were associated with improved CSS. In the whole cohort of patients with PSA ≥ 50 ng/mL and RP subgroup, PSA failed to retain its independent prognostic value for CSS.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients treated with local therapy for nmPCa with very high PSA at diagnosis have relatively good long-term oncological outcomes. Therefore, among well-selected patients with nmPCa, high PSA levels alone should not preclude the use of radical local therapy. Potential selection bias limits inferences about the relative effectiveness of specific local therapies in this setting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37545342
doi: 10.1002/pros.24609
doi:

Substances chimiques

Prostate-Specific Antigen EC 3.4.21.77

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1504-1515

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1320-1328. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0810084
Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Carroll PR. Risk assessment for prostate cancer metastasis and mortality at the time of diagnosis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(12):878-887. doi:10.1093/jnci/djp122
D'Amico AV. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998;280(11):969-974. doi:10.1001/jama.280.11.969
Radziszewski P, Ślusarczyk A. Re: risk stratification of patients candidate to radical prostatectomy based on clinical and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging parameters: development and external validation of novel risk groups. Eur Urol. 2022;82(2):240-241. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.019
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7-33. doi:10.3322/caac.21708
Stattin K, Sandin F, Bratt O, Lambe M. The risk of distant metastases and cancer specific survival in men with serum prostate specific antigen values above 100 ng/ml. J Urol. 2015;194(6):1594-1600. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.082
Thomsen FB, Westerberg M, Garmo H, et al. Prediction of metastatic prostate cancer by prostate-specific antigen in combination with T stage and gleason grade: nationwide, population-based register study. PLoS One. 2020;15(1):e0228447. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228447
Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, et al. 10-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(15):1415-1424. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1606220
Bruwer G, Heyns CF, Allen FJ. Influence of local tumour stage and grade on reliability of serum prostate-specific antigen in predicting skeletal metastases in patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Eur Urol. 1999;35(3):223-227. doi:10.1159/000019850
Wilt TJ, Jones KM, Barry MJ, et al. Follow-up of prostatectomy versus observation for early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(2):132-142. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1615869
Parker CC, James ND, Brawley CD, et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;392(10162):2353-2366. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32486-3
Yanagisawa T, Rajwa P, Thibault C, et al. Androgen receptor signaling inhibitors in addition to docetaxel with androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2022;82(6):584-598. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2022.08.002
Ang M, Rajcic B, Foreman D, Moretti K, O'Callaghan ME. Men presenting with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values of over 100 ng/mL. BJU Int. 2016;117(S4):68-75. doi:10.1111/bju.13411
Rana A, Karamanis K, Lucas MG, Chisholm GD. Identification of metastatic disease by T category, gleason score and serum PSA level in patients with carcinoma of the prostate. Br J Urol. 1992;69(3):277-281. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.1992.tb15528.x
Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet. 2020;395(10231):1208-1216. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30314-7
Erdem S, Simsek DH, Degirmenci E, et al. How accurate is 68Gallium-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) on primary lymph node staging before radical prostatectomy in intermediate and high risk prostate cancer? A study of patient- and lymph node- based analyses. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Invest. 2022;40(1):6.e1-6.e9. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.07.006
Freedland SJ, Hotaling JM, Fitzsimons NJ, et al. PSA in the new millennium: a powerful predictor of prostate cancer prognosis and radical prostatectomy outcomes-results from the SEARCH database. Eur Urol. 2008;53(4):758-766. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.08.047
Inman BA, Davies JD, Rangel LJ, et al. Long-term outcomes of radical prostatectomy with multimodal adjuvant therapy in men with a preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen level ≥50 ng/ml. Cancer. 2008;113(7):1544-1551. doi:10.1002/cncr.23767
Gontero P, Spahn M, Tombal B, et al. Is there a prostate-specific antigen upper limit for radical prostatectomy? BJU Int. 2011;108(7):1093-1100. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10076.x
Tilki D, Mandel P, Karakiewicz PI, et al. The impact of very high initial PSA on oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Urol Oncol Semin Original Invest. 2020;38(5):379-385. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.12.027
Izumi K, Lin WJ, Miyamoto H, et al. Outcomes and predictive factors of prostate cancer patients with extremely high prostate-specific antigen level. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014;140(8):1413-1419. doi:10.1007/s00432-014-1681-8
Hochreiter WW. The issue of prostate cancer evaluation in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen and chronic prostatitis. Andrologia. 2008;40(2):130-133. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0272.2007.00820.x

Auteurs

Aleksander Ślusarczyk (A)

Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Michael Baboudjian (M)

Department of Urology, APHM, North Academic Hospital, Marseille, France.

Piotr Zapała (P)

Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Takafumi Yanagisawa (T)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Marcin Miszczyk (M)

IIIrd Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Department, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warszawa, Poland.

Marcin Chlosta (M)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University in Cracow, Kraków, Poland.

Paul Krumpoeck (P)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Marco Moschini (M)

Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

Giorgio Gandaglia (G)

Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

Guillaume Ploussard (G)

Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France.

Juan G Rivas (JG)

Department of Urology, Clinico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.

Marcin Życzkowski (M)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland.

Pierre I Karakiewicz (PI)

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.

Piotr Radziszewski (P)

Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Michael S Leapman (MS)

Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Shahrokh F Shariat (SF)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Department of Urology, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.

Paweł Rajwa (P)

Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH