NVX-CoV2373-induced T- and B-cellular immunity in immunosuppressed people with multiple sclerosis that failed to respond to mRNA and viral vector SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
NVX-CoV2373
SARS-CoV-2 vaccination
anti-CD20 therapy
humoral and T cellular vaccination response
immunomodulation
multiple sclerosis
sphingosine-1phosphate receptor modulators
Journal
Frontiers in immunology
ISSN: 1664-3224
Titre abrégé: Front Immunol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101560960
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
27
10
2022
accepted:
03
07
2023
medline:
8
8
2023
pubmed:
7
8
2023
entrez:
7
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Immunological response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination is important, especially in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) on immunosuppressive therapies. This study aims to determine whether adjuvanted protein-based vaccine NVX-CoV2373 is able to induce an immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in pwMS with inadequate responses to prior triple mRNA/viral vector vaccination. We conducted a single-center, prospective longitudinal cohort study at the MS Center in Dresden, Germany. In total, 65 participants were included in the study in accordance with the following eligibility criteria: age > 18 years, immunomodulatory treatment, and insufficient T-cellular and humoral response to prior vaccination with at least two doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273) or viral vector vaccines (AZD1222, Ad26.COV2.S). Intramuscular vaccination with two doses of NVX-CoV2373 at baseline and 3 weeks of follow-up. The development of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies and T-cell responses was evaluated. For the final analysis, data from 47 patients on stable treatment with sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators and 17 on ocrelizumab were available. The tolerability of the NVX-CoV2373 vaccination was overall good and comparable to the one reported for the general population. After the second NVX-CoV2373 vaccination, 59% of S1PR-modulated patients developed antispike IgG antibodies above the predefined cutoff of 200 binding antibody units (BAU)/ml (mean, 1,204.37 [95% CI, 693.15, 2,092.65] BAU/ml), whereas no clinically significant T-cell response was found. In the subgroup of the patients on ocrelizumab treatment, 23.5% developed antispike IgG > 200 BAU/ml (mean, 116.3 [95% CI, 47.04, 287.51] BAU/ml) and 53% showed positive spike-specific T-cellular responses (IFN-gamma release to antigen 1: mean, 0.2 [95% CI, 0.11, 0.31] IU/ml; antigen 2: mean, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.14, 0.37]) after the second vaccination. Vaccination with two doses of NVX-CoV2373 was able to elicit a SARS-CoV-2-specific immune response in pwMS lacking adequate immune responses to previous mRNA/viral vector vaccination. For patients receiving S1PR modulators, an increase in anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies was detected after NVX-CoV2373 vaccination, whereas in ocrelizumab-treated patients, the increase of antiviral T-cell responses was more pronounced. Our data may impact clinical decision-making by influencing the preference for NVX-CoV2373 vaccination in pwMS receiving treatment with S1PR modulation or anti-CD20 treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37545513
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1081933
pmc: PMC10399811
doi:
Substances chimiques
NVX-CoV2373 adjuvated lipid nanoparticle
2SCD8Q63PF
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
Ad26COVS1
JT2NS6183B
BNT162 Vaccine
0
ChAdOx1 nCoV-19
B5S3K2V0G8
Viral Vaccines
0
Immunoglobulin G
0
Antibodies, Viral
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1081933Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Mueller-Enz, Woopen, Katoul Al Rahbani, Haase, Dunsche, Ziemssen and Akgün.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
KA received personal compensation for consulting services and speaker honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Merck, Sanofi, Teva, BMS, Biogen, and Celgene. TZ received personal compensation for consulting services and speaker honoraria from Biogen Idec, Bayer, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva, and Synthon. TZ received additional financial support for research activities from Bayer, Biogen Idec, Novartis, Teva, and Sanofi Aventis. CW received travel support from Novartis. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):270-278
pubmed: 33335323
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2021 Apr 22;14:17562864211012835
pubmed: 34035836
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Aug;64:103937
pubmed: 35700625
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2022 Oct 12;9(6):
pubmed: 36224045
JCI Insight. 2022 Feb 22;7(4):
pubmed: 35030101
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2017 Sep 13;4(6):e398
pubmed: 28955715
Lancet Rheumatol. 2021 Nov;3(11):e789-e797
pubmed: 34514436
N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 4;385(19):1774-1785
pubmed: 34551225
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Apr 01;79(4):399-404
pubmed: 35212717
J Clin Invest. 2022 Oct 3;132(19):
pubmed: 35943810
Neurology. 2015 Mar 3;84(9):872-9
pubmed: 25636714
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Nov;22(11):1565-1576
pubmed: 35963274
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2187-2201
pubmed: 33882225
Mult Scler. 2022 Jun;28(7):1041-1050
pubmed: 35575234
Lancet. 2020 Aug 15;396(10249):467-478
pubmed: 32702298
Neurology. 2022 Feb 1;98(5):e541-e554
pubmed: 34810244
Lancet Rheumatol. 2022 May;4(5):e338-e350
pubmed: 35317410
Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 23;12:747774
pubmed: 34887855
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 12;383(20):1920-1931
pubmed: 32663912
J Travel Med. 2022 May 31;29(3):
pubmed: 34918097
JAMA. 2021 Apr 20;325(15):1535-1544
pubmed: 33704352
J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Dec;52(12):1879-90
pubmed: 22174429
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Apr;60:103729
pubmed: 35334278
EBioMedicine. 2021 Nov;73:103636
pubmed: 34666226
Lancet. 2022 Jan 1;399(10319):36-49
pubmed: 34883053
N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 4;385(19):1761-1773
pubmed: 34525277
Nat Med. 2021 Nov;27(11):1990-2001
pubmed: 34522051
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 23;385(13):1172-1183
pubmed: 34192426
J Clin Virol. 2022 Dec;157:105321
pubmed: 36279695
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):403-416
pubmed: 33378609
Front Immunol. 2022 Aug 05;13:926318
pubmed: 35990701
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 16;385(25):2348-2360
pubmed: 34587382
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 17;383(25):2427-2438
pubmed: 32991794
Cell. 2022 Jul 7;185(14):2434-2451.e17
pubmed: 35764089
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Dec 1;78(12):1529-1531
pubmed: 34554185
Curr Opin Immunol. 2022 Aug;77:102229
pubmed: 35779364
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2023 Jan-Dec;22(1):501-517
pubmed: 37246757
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 3;386(9):847-860
pubmed: 35139271
Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):1979-1993
pubmed: 33220855
Vaccine. 2021 May 12;39(20):2791-2799
pubmed: 33707061
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2019 Feb;25(2):245-254
pubmed: 30044050
Neurology. 2020 Oct 6;95(14):e1999-e2008
pubmed: 32727835
Biomedicines. 2022 Jun 21;10(7):
pubmed: 35884770
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 24;75(1):e1037-e1045
pubmed: 34791081
Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023 Mar;10:100139
pubmed: 36647543
Ann Neurol. 2011 Feb;69(2):408-13
pubmed: 21387383
Eur J Neurol. 2018 Mar;25(3):527-534
pubmed: 29205701
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 13;384(19):1824-1835
pubmed: 33440088
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 17;383(25):2439-2450
pubmed: 33053279
Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7868):572-577
pubmed: 34044428
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 7;384(1):80-82
pubmed: 33270381
Vaccine. 2016 Apr 7;34(16):1927-35
pubmed: 26921779