What factors are associated with anaemia in pregnancy among Nigerian women? Evidence from a national survey.


Journal

African health sciences
ISSN: 1729-0503
Titre abrégé: Afr Health Sci
Pays: Uganda
ID NLM: 101149451

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Historique:
medline: 8 8 2023
pubmed: 7 8 2023
entrez: 7 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Anaemia in pregnancy remains a severe public health problem in sub-Saharan African countries including Nigeria. To assess factors associated with anaemia in pregnancy among Nigerian women. A secondary analysis of the 2018 Nigeria demographic health survey was conducted to determine the predictors of anaemia among Nigerian pregnant women (N=1522). SAS 9.4 was used for the analysis. The prevalence of anaemia in pregnancy was 61.1%. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, women in the North-central (AOR=2.52, CI=1.46-4.35) and South-south (AOR=2.21, CI=1.06-4.59) had increased odds of anaemia in pregnancy, compared to those in the Northwest. Women with no education (AOR=2.38, CI=1.28-4.44), primary education (AOR=3.06, CI=1.58-5.96) and secondary education (AOR=1.75, CI=1.04-2.94) had increased odds of anaemia in pregnancy compared to women with teriary education. Also, women not in marital union had increased odds of anaemia in pregnancy compared to women in a union (AOR=2.56, CI=1.15-5.72). Women in the second (AOR=2.42, CI=1.79-3.29) and third trimesters of pregnancy (AOR=2.83, CI=2.07-3.89) had increased odds of anaemia. These findings are important for the control of anemia among pregnant Nigerian women. Women in the Northcentral and Southsouth zones are particularly at risk for anaemia in pregnancy and should receive special attention during antenatal care.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Anaemia in pregnancy remains a severe public health problem in sub-Saharan African countries including Nigeria.
Objectives UNASSIGNED
To assess factors associated with anaemia in pregnancy among Nigerian women.
Methods UNASSIGNED
A secondary analysis of the 2018 Nigeria demographic health survey was conducted to determine the predictors of anaemia among Nigerian pregnant women (N=1522). SAS 9.4 was used for the analysis.
Results UNASSIGNED
The prevalence of anaemia in pregnancy was 61.1%. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, women in the North-central (AOR=2.52, CI=1.46-4.35) and South-south (AOR=2.21, CI=1.06-4.59) had increased odds of anaemia in pregnancy, compared to those in the Northwest. Women with no education (AOR=2.38, CI=1.28-4.44), primary education (AOR=3.06, CI=1.58-5.96) and secondary education (AOR=1.75, CI=1.04-2.94) had increased odds of anaemia in pregnancy compared to women with teriary education. Also, women not in marital union had increased odds of anaemia in pregnancy compared to women in a union (AOR=2.56, CI=1.15-5.72). Women in the second (AOR=2.42, CI=1.79-3.29) and third trimesters of pregnancy (AOR=2.83, CI=2.07-3.89) had increased odds of anaemia.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
These findings are important for the control of anemia among pregnant Nigerian women. Women in the Northcentral and Southsouth zones are particularly at risk for anaemia in pregnancy and should receive special attention during antenatal care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37545905
doi: 10.4314/ahs.v23i1.39
pii: jAFHS.v23.i1.pg373
pmc: PMC10398454
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

373-383

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Adeyemi EO et al.

Références

Health Care Women Int. 2010 Jul;31(7):585-98
pubmed: 20526925
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 2014;244:82-9; discussion 89
pubmed: 25083899
World J Pediatr. 2021 Apr;17(2):197-204
pubmed: 33625695
Anemia. 2018 May 02;2018:1846280
pubmed: 29854446
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;900:125-36
pubmed: 10818399
Lancet Glob Health. 2013 Jul;1(1):e16-25
pubmed: 25103581
Afr J Reprod Health. 2011 Dec;15(4):33-41
pubmed: 22571103
Blood. 2013 Apr 4;121(14):2607-17
pubmed: 23355536
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec 11;19(1):495
pubmed: 31829146
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:849080
pubmed: 24982910

Auteurs

Emmanuel Olusola Adeyemi (EO)

East Tennessee State University, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology.

Temitope Olumuyiwa Ojo (TO)

Obafemi Awolowo University College of Health Sciences, Department of Community Health.

Megan Quinn (M)

East Tennessee State University, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology.

Bill Brooks (B)

East Tennessee State University, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology.

Oluwabunmi Anuoluwapo Oke (OA)

Heatherwood Hospital, Department of Surgery.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH