Mechanical Thrombectomy for Basilar Artery Occlusion with a Type 1 Persistent Proatlantal Artery: A Case Report and Literature Review.
acute ischemic stroke
basilar artery occlusion
endovascular treatment
mechanical thrombectomy
persistent proatlantal artery
Journal
Journal of neuroendovascular therapy
ISSN: 2186-2494
Titre abrégé: J Neuroendovasc Ther
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101488164
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
15
02
2023
accepted:
16
05
2023
medline:
7
8
2023
pubmed:
7
8
2023
entrez:
7
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Persistent proatlantal artery (PPA) is a primitive carotid-vertebrobasilar anastomosis (CVA); acute ischemic stroke due to basilar artery (BA) occlusion via a PPA is extremely rare. An 84-year-old female developed disturbance of consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale E2V1M5) and quadriparesis with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 35. Head CT revealed early ischemic changes in the right temporal lobe, and a hyperdense vessel sign in the BA. Cerebral angiography showed that the left vertebral artery (VA) did not originate from the left subclavian artery or aortic arch. A left common carotid artery angiogram showed the presence of the left PPA originating from the left external carotid artery. Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with contact aspiration using a Penumbra 5MAX ACE 60 aspiration catheter was performed, and successful recanalization was achieved after clot retrieval in the first attempt (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale 2b). MRI performed the following day, however, revealed a newly developed large hemorrhagic infarction in the pons, with no improvement in her symptoms (modified Rankin Scale score of 5 at 90 days). Although MT achieved successful recanalization of the BA via the PPA, her clinical symptoms did not improve, probably because of poor collateral circulation or the long length of the occlusion. In patients with acute vertebro-BA occlusion, if the VA does not originate from the subclavian artery or aortic arch, the presence of a primitive CVA should be considered.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37546343
doi: 10.5797/jnet.cr.2023-0007
pii: jnet.cr.2023-0007
pmc: PMC10400907
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
139-144Informations de copyright
©2023 The Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None of the authors have any conflicts of interest in relation to this article.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2022 Oct 13;387(15):1373-1384
pubmed: 36239645
J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Mar;61:272-274
pubmed: 30528542
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Feb;31(1):52-9
pubmed: 27074275
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2017 Jun 15;57(6):267-277
pubmed: 28458386
Interv Neuroradiol. 2021 Jun;27(3):397-401
pubmed: 33175615
Front Neurol. 2022 May 23;13:812458
pubmed: 35677331
JAMA. 1995 Oct 4;274(13):1017-25
pubmed: 7563451
Stroke. 2020 Jul;51(7):2045-2050
pubmed: 32568658
Childs Nerv Syst. 2009 Apr;25(4):411-21
pubmed: 19212779
Stroke. 1993 Dec;24(12):2114-7
pubmed: 8248997
N Engl J Med. 2022 Oct 13;387(15):1361-1372
pubmed: 36239644
J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;20(4):231-234
pubmed: 31745466
Biomed J. 2021 Jun;44(3):369-372
pubmed: 34130943
No To Shinkei. 1988 Mar;40(3):219-24
pubmed: 3293637
J Neurosurg. 2011 Apr;114(4):1127-34
pubmed: 21235309