Out-of-Hospital emergency airway management practices: A nationwide observational study from Aotearoa New Zealand.
Airway
EMS
Emergency
Endotracheal Intubation
Nasopharyngeal
New Zealand
Oropharyngeal
Paramedic
Rapid Sequence Induction
Journal
Resuscitation plus
ISSN: 2666-5204
Titre abrégé: Resusc Plus
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101774410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
23
05
2023
revised:
29
06
2023
accepted:
10
07
2023
medline:
7
8
2023
pubmed:
7
8
2023
entrez:
7
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Airway management is crucial for emergency care in critically ill patients outside the hospital setting. An Airway Registry is useful in providing essential information for quality improvement purposes. Therefore, this study aimed to develop an out-of-hospital airway registry and describe airway management practices in Aotearoa New Zealand (AoNZ). Data from the Aotearoa New Zealand Paramedic Care Collection (ANZPaCC) database were used in a retrospective cohort study covering July 2020 to June 2021. All patients receiving airway interventions were included. An airway intervention was defined as one or more of the following: non-drug assisted endotracheal intubation (NDA-ETI), drug-assisted endotracheal intubation (DA-ETI; where a combination of paralytic agent and sedative were used to aid in intubation), laryngeal mask airway (LMA), oropharyngeal airway (OPA), nasopharyngeal airway (NPA), surgical airway (cricothyroidotomy), suction, jaw thrust. Descriptive statistics were analysed using Chi-Square and logistic regression modelling investigated the relationship between advanced airway success and patient characteristics. The study included 4,529 patients who underwent 7,779 airway interventions. Basic airway interventions were used most frequently: OPA (45.1%), NPA (29.3%), LMA (28.9%), suction (19.9%) and jaw thrust (17.6%). Advanced airway interventions were used less frequently: NDA-ETI (19.8%), DA-ETI (8.7%), and surgical airways (0.2%). The success rate for ETI (including both NDA-ETI and DA-ETI) was 89.4%, with NDA-ETI success at 85.8% and DA-ETI success at 97.7%. ETI first-pass success rates were significantly lower for males (aOR 0.65, 95%CI 0.48-0.87, Out-of-hospital airway management practices and success rates in AoNZ are comparable to those elsewhere. This research has determined the variables to be used as the AoNZ Paramedic Airway Registry ongoing and has demonstrated baseline outcomes in airway management for ongoing quality improvement using this registry.
Sections du résumé
Background and Objectives
UNASSIGNED
Airway management is crucial for emergency care in critically ill patients outside the hospital setting. An Airway Registry is useful in providing essential information for quality improvement purposes. Therefore, this study aimed to develop an out-of-hospital airway registry and describe airway management practices in Aotearoa New Zealand (AoNZ).
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Data from the Aotearoa New Zealand Paramedic Care Collection (ANZPaCC) database were used in a retrospective cohort study covering July 2020 to June 2021. All patients receiving airway interventions were included. An airway intervention was defined as one or more of the following: non-drug assisted endotracheal intubation (NDA-ETI), drug-assisted endotracheal intubation (DA-ETI; where a combination of paralytic agent and sedative were used to aid in intubation), laryngeal mask airway (LMA), oropharyngeal airway (OPA), nasopharyngeal airway (NPA), surgical airway (cricothyroidotomy), suction, jaw thrust. Descriptive statistics were analysed using Chi-Square and logistic regression modelling investigated the relationship between advanced airway success and patient characteristics.
Results
UNASSIGNED
The study included 4,529 patients who underwent 7,779 airway interventions. Basic airway interventions were used most frequently: OPA (45.1%), NPA (29.3%), LMA (28.9%), suction (19.9%) and jaw thrust (17.6%). Advanced airway interventions were used less frequently: NDA-ETI (19.8%), DA-ETI (8.7%), and surgical airways (0.2%). The success rate for ETI (including both NDA-ETI and DA-ETI) was 89.4%, with NDA-ETI success at 85.8% and DA-ETI success at 97.7%. ETI first-pass success rates were significantly lower for males (aOR 0.65, 95%CI 0.48-0.87,
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Out-of-hospital airway management practices and success rates in AoNZ are comparable to those elsewhere. This research has determined the variables to be used as the AoNZ Paramedic Airway Registry ongoing and has demonstrated baseline outcomes in airway management for ongoing quality improvement using this registry.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37547539
doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100432
pii: S2666-5204(23)00075-9
pmc: PMC10400901
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100432Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
Resuscitation. 2014 Jul;85(7):885-92
pubmed: 24642405
Resuscitation. 2019 Jun;139:133-143
pubmed: 30981882
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2022;26(sup1):14-22
pubmed: 35001828
Emerg Med Australas. 2017 Oct;29(5):499-508
pubmed: 28582801
Resuscitation. 2019 Dec;145:56-62
pubmed: 31585186
Resuscitation. 2007 Sep;74(3):427-31
pubmed: 17433526
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Feb;27(2):100-108
pubmed: 31957174
Resuscitation. 2014 Dec;85(12):1662-6
pubmed: 25260723
Anaesthesia. 2022 Dec;77(12):1395-1415
pubmed: 35977431
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Aug 07;23:57
pubmed: 26250700
Br Paramed J. 2018 Jun 1;3(1):23-27
pubmed: 33328802
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Jul-Sep;14(3):377-401
pubmed: 20507222
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Jun;49(3):1199-1215
pubmed: 35962218
Emerg Med Australas. 2018 Oct;30(5):662-671
pubmed: 29569842
Anesth Analg. 2009 Aug;109(2):489-93
pubmed: 19608824
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(5):662-668
pubmed: 36074561
Resuscitation. 2011 Apr;82(4):378-85
pubmed: 21288624
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 May;75(5):627-636
pubmed: 31983493
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Nov;28(11):788-95
pubmed: 21897263
Air Med J. 2021 Nov-Dec;40(6):385-389
pubmed: 34794775
Br J Nurs. 2022 Jun 9;31(11):564-570
pubmed: 35678814
Intensive Care Med. 2014 May;40(5):629-39
pubmed: 24556912
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2022;26(sup1):54-63
pubmed: 35001831
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Apr;29(4):406-414
pubmed: 34923705