Spermatogenesis after gonadotoxic childhood treatment: follow-up of 12 patients.

cancer fertility preservation gonadotoxic treatment male infertility testicular tissue banking

Journal

Human reproduction open
ISSN: 2399-3529
Titre abrégé: Hum Reprod Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101722764

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 14 03 2023
revised: 13 07 2023
medline: 7 8 2023
pubmed: 7 8 2023
entrez: 7 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

What is the long-term impact of presumed gonadotoxic treatment during childhood on the patient's testicular function at adulthood? Although most patients showed low testicular volumes and some degree of reproductive hormone disruption 12.3 (2.3-21.0) years after gonadotoxic childhood therapy, active spermatogenesis was demonstrated in the semen sample of 8 out of the 12 patients. In recent decades, experimental testicular tissue banking programmes have been set up to safeguard the future fertility of young boys requiring chemo- and/or radiotherapy with significant gonadotoxicity. Although the risk of azoospermia following such therapies is estimated to be high, only limited long-term data are available on the reproductive potential at adulthood. This single-centre prospective cohort study was conducted between September 2020 and February 2023 and involved 12 adult patients. This study was carried out in a tertiary care centre and included 12 young adults (18.1-28.3 years old) who had been offered testicular tissue banking prior to gonadotoxic treatment during childhood. All patients had a consultation and physical examination with a fertility specialist, a scrotal ultrasound to measure the testicular volumes and evaluate the testicular parenchyma, a blood test for assessment of reproductive hormones, and a semen analysis. Testicular tissue was banked prior to the gonadotoxic treatment for 10 out of the 12 included patients. Testicular volumes were low for 9 patients, and 10 patients showed some degree of reproductive hormone disruption. Remarkably, ongoing spermatogenesis was demonstrated in 8 patients at a median 12.3 (range 2.3-21.0) years post-treatment. This study had a limited sample size, making additional research with a larger study population necessary to verify these preliminary findings. These findings highlight the need for multicentric research with a larger study population to establish universal inclusion criteria for immature testicular tissue banking. This study was conducted with financial support from the Research Programme of the Research Foundation-Flanders (G010918N), Kom Op Tegen Kanker, and Scientific Fund Willy Gepts (WFWG19-03). The authors declare no competing interests. NCT04202094; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04202094?id=NCT04202094&draw=2&rank=1 This study was registered on 6 December 2019, and the first patient was enrolled on 8 September 2020.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37547664
doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad029
pii: hoad029
pmc: PMC10403430
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04202094']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

hoad029

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

Hum Reprod. 2015 Nov;30(11):2463-75
pubmed: 26358785
BMC Med. 2016 Jan 04;14:1
pubmed: 26728489
Endocr Connect. 2018 Feb;7(2):R69-R87
pubmed: 29351905
Fertil Steril. 1986 Dec;46(6):1118-23
pubmed: 2946611
Leukemia. 2017 Jun;31(6):1460-1463
pubmed: 28270690
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 10;11(11):e0165125
pubmed: 27832085
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 Jul;3(7):556-67
pubmed: 25873571
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Jun;17(6):879-87
pubmed: 15270406
Hum Reprod. 1997 Jun;12(6):1222-6
pubmed: 9222005
Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Jun 06;2020(3):hoaa016
pubmed: 32529047
Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2013 Jan 01;5(1):224-31
pubmed: 23276984
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Feb;22(2):e57-e67
pubmed: 33539754
Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2019 Nov 20;13:1179558119886342
pubmed: 31798308
Hum Reprod. 2017 Dec 01;32(12):2366-2372
pubmed: 29040511
Hum Reprod. 2004 Apr;19(4):948-53
pubmed: 14990537
Int J Pediatr Endocrinol. 2017;2017:7
pubmed: 28725240
Eur J Cancer. 2022 Sep;173:146-166
pubmed: 35932626
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 10;28(2):332-9
pubmed: 19949008
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Jan;61(1):53-67
pubmed: 23940101
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;116(5):1171-83
pubmed: 20966703
Hum Reprod. 2011 Apr;26(4):737-47
pubmed: 21227939
N Engl J Med. 1987 Nov 19;317(21):1315-21
pubmed: 3683460
Hum Reprod. 2006 Jul;21(7):1787-90
pubmed: 16497697
Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1995 May-Jun;12(3):231-41
pubmed: 7640176
Cancer. 1985 May 15;55(10):2353-63
pubmed: 3986738
Fertil Steril. 2016 Dec;106(7):1652-1657.e2
pubmed: 27717555
Hum Reprod. 2021 Jan 1;36(1):26-39
pubmed: 33259629
Hum Reprod. 2018 Sep 1;33(9):1677-1683
pubmed: 30052981
Hormones (Athens). 2015 Oct-Dec;14(4):579-89
pubmed: 26732148
Fertil Steril. 2022 Jun;117(6):1121-1131
pubmed: 35367058
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 May;142(5):1127-32
pubmed: 26860726
Asian J Androl. 2009 Mar;11(2):261-5
pubmed: 19151736
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Oct;15(11):1215-23
pubmed: 25239573
J Pediatr. 1983 Oct;103(4):562-5
pubmed: 6620016
Br J Urol. 1983 Dec;55(6):774-9
pubmed: 6652451
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Sep 20;30(27):3408-16
pubmed: 22649147
Hum Reprod. 2016 Feb;31(2):227-32
pubmed: 26682580
Andrologia. 2012 May;44 Suppl 1:219-25
pubmed: 21726269
Arch Dis Child. 1970 Feb;45(239):13-23
pubmed: 5440182
J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 13;8(12):
pubmed: 31847212
Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 May;44(5):889-895
pubmed: 35282994
Int J Androl. 2011 Feb;34(1):69-76
pubmed: 20345878
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020 Sep;67(9):e28507
pubmed: 32649054
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Feb;18(2):e75-e90
pubmed: 28214419
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 10;13:854186
pubmed: 35360062
Eur J Endocrinol. 2001 Nov;145(5):561-71
pubmed: 11720872
Hum Reprod. 2019 Jun 4;34(6):966-977
pubmed: 31111889
Endocr Connect. 2021 Oct 18;10(10):1352-1365
pubmed: 34533474
Indian J Med Res. 2019 Nov;150(5):477-485
pubmed: 31939391
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014 Mar;31(3):307-12
pubmed: 24352355

Auteurs

E Delgouffe (E)

Department of Reproduction, Genetics and Regenerative Medicine (RGRG), Biology of the Testis (BITE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.

A Braye (A)

Department of Reproduction, Genetics and Regenerative Medicine (RGRG), Biology of the Testis (BITE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.

V Vloeberghs (V)

Brussels IVF, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.

I Mateizel (I)

Brussels IVF, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.

C Ernst (C)

Division of Paediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.

A Ferster (A)

Department of Hemato-Oncology, Hôpital Universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola (HUDERF), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.

C Devalck (C)

Department of Hemato-Oncology, Hôpital Universitaire des Enfants Reine Fabiola (HUDERF), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.

H Tournaye (H)

Brussels IVF, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, Perinatology and Reproduction, Institute of Professional Education, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.

I Gies (I)

Division of Paediatric Endocrinology, Department of Paediatrics, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.

E Goossens (E)

Department of Reproduction, Genetics and Regenerative Medicine (RGRG), Biology of the Testis (BITE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH