Prospective study to assess the efficacy and safety of a noninvasive electro-muscular stimulation for improvement of muscle strength and muscle toning of the extremities.

HIFEM aesthetic muscle stimulation elctromagnetic muscle stimulation

Journal

Lasers in surgery and medicine
ISSN: 1096-9101
Titre abrégé: Lasers Surg Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8007168

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Aug 2023
Historique:
revised: 10 07 2023
received: 18 12 2022
accepted: 11 07 2023
pubmed: 7 8 2023
medline: 7 8 2023
entrez: 7 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) device in the improvement of muscle strength and toning of the upper extremities. This device, which is FDA-cleared as a two-channel muscle stimulator, provides up to eight electrodes with waveforms inducing muscle stimulation. Although a prior study demonstrated it is safe and effective for use in the abdomen, this system, which has electrodes specifically designed for the extremities, has not previously been evaluated in the upper extremities. Forty-five subjects enrolled in the study to assess improvement in arm (i.e., bicep and tricep muscle) strength, and appearance following a protocol of treatments with this bioelectric muscle activation (BMA) device. All subjects received four 30-min EMS treatment sessions in Arm mode-twice weekly for 2 weeks and at least 48 h apart. Follow up visits were also scheduled 30- and 90-days after treatment. Strength was measured with a dynamometer device at baseline, at the final treatment session, and at the posttreatment 30- and 90-day assessment. Subject satisfaction was assessed gauging overall comfort of the treatment and satisfaction including willingness to recommend to others. The changes in strength between initial treatment and final treatment, as well as 30 and 90-day assessment were evaluated. Clinical photography at these visits was also assessed for each patient. Patients were instructed to not modify their normal exercise routine while participating in this study. All 45 subjects completed the treatment protocol. Most patients showed an improvement in muscle strength from the initial to final treatment (i.e., the fourth treatment). Specifically, the maximum bicep strength increased by a mean of 7.5 lbs (22.83%, p = 0.006), while the average increased by a mean of 8.2 lbs (25.76%, p = 0.001) during this period. Similarly, the maximum tricep strength from initial to final treatment increased by a mean of 10.0 lbs (23.16%, p = 0.000), while the average increased by a mean of 9.6 lbs (27.12%, p = 0.000). Thirty days after the last treatment, the maximum bicep strength increased by a mean of 13.3 lbs (34.13%, p = 0.001) while the average increased by a mean of 13.6 lbs (37.05%, p = 0.000) during this period. Similarly, the maximum tricep strength from initial to 30 days postfinal treatment increased by a mean of 10.9 lbs (24.37%, p = 0.000), while the average increased by a mean of 10.5 lbs (29.37%, p = 0.000). Finally, 90 days after the last treatment, the maximum bicep strength increased by a mean of 19.4 lbs (48.4%, p = 0.000), while the average increased by a mean of 17.4 lbs (46.53%, p = 0.000) during this period. Similarly, the maximum tricep strength from initial to 90 days postfinal treatment increased by a mean of 10.8 lbs (27.12%, p = 0.000), while the average increased by a mean of 10.0 lbs (30.94%, p = 0.001). This device was well tolerated and resulted in increased strength measurements in the upper extremities, as assessed by a dynamometer, which were sustained at 30 and 90 days.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37548069
doi: 10.1002/lsm.23711
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

American Society for Dermatologic Surgery (ASDS). Procedures survey results. 2019. https://www.asds.net/portals/0/PDF/procedures-survey-results-presentation-2019.pdf
Fabi S, Dover JS, Tanzi E, Bowes LE, Tsai Fu F, Odusan A. A 12-week, prospective, non-comparative, non-randomized study of magnetic muscle stimulation for improvement of body satisfaction with the abdomen and buttocks. Lasers Surg Med. 2021;53(1):79-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23348
Manudhane AP, Wang S, Ezaldein HH, Scott JF. Powered muscle stimulators: an investigation into newly FDA 510(k) approved devices marketed for muscle toning and esthetic benefit. J Dermatol Treat. 2020;31(2):200-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2019.1587148
Kavanagh S, Newell J, Hennessy M, Sadick N. Use of a neuromuscular electrical stimulation device for facial muscle toning: a randomized, controlled trial. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2012;11(4):261-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12007
Porcari J, Ryskey A, Foster C. The effects of high-intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation on abdominal strength and endurance, core strength, abdominal girth, and perceived body shape and satisfaction. Int J Kinesiol Sports Sci. 2018;6(1):19-25. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijkss.v.6n.1p.19
Rambhia PH, Turner L, Ugonabo N, Chapas A. Muscle stimulation for aesthetic body shaping: a comprehensive and critical review. Dermatol Surg. 2022;48(10):1076-1082. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000003550.
LoVerme W, Calderhead G. Pilot study to assess the efficacy and safety of a novel, bioelectric muscle activation device for muscle toning and fat reduction. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(10):1096-1104. https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.0100
Jacob CI, Paskova K. Safety and efficacy of a novel high-intensity focused electromagnetic technology device for noninvasive abdominal body shaping. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018;17(5):783-787. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12779
Balmaseda MT Jr., Fatehi MT, Koozekanani SH, Sheppard JS. Burns in functional electric stimulation: two case reports. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68(7):452-453.
Porcari JP, McLean KP, Foster C, Kernozek T, Crenshaw B, Swenson C. Effects of electrical muscle stimulation on body composition, muscle strength, and physical appearance. J Strength Cond Res. 2002;16(2):165-172.
Lambert H, Baetzelier ED, Vanalme G, Mey GD Skin burn risks using transcutaneous direct current. In: Proceedings of 17th international conference of the engineering in medicine and biology society. Vol 1. 1995:647-648.
Katz B, Bard R, Goldfarb R, Shiloh A, Kenolova D. Ultrasound assessment of subcutaneous abdominal fat thickness after treatments with a high-intensity focused electromagnetic field device: a multicenter study. Dermatol Surg. 2019;45(12):1542-1548. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001902
Katz B, Duncan D. Lifting and toning of arms and calves using high-intensity focused electromagnetic field (HIFEM) procedure documented by ultrasound assessment. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(7):755-759. https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.5878
Katz B. MRI assessment of arm and calf muscle toning with high-intensity focused electromagnetic technology: case study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(5):556-558.
Wirtz N, Zinner C, Doermann U, Kleinoeder H, Mester J. Effects of loaded squat exercise with and without application of superimposed EMS on physical performance. J Sports Sci Med. 2016;15(1):26-33.
Jacob C, Kinney B, Busso M, Chilukuri S, McCoy JD, Bailey C, et al. High intensity focused electro-magnetic technology (HIFEM) for non-invasive buttock lifting and toning of gluteal muscles: a multi-center efficacy and safety study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(11):1229-1232.
Kinney BM, Lozanova P. High intensity focused electromagnetic therapy evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging: safety and efficacy study of a dual tissue effect based non-invasive abdominal body shaping. Lasers Surg Med. 2019;51(1):40-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23024
Hong JY, Oh JH, Shin J. Rhabdomyolysis caused by knee push-ups with whole body electromyostimulation. Br J Hosp Med. 2016;77(9):542-543. https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2016.77.9.542
Kästner A, Braun M, Meyer T. Two cases of rhabdomyolysis after training with electromyostimulation by 2 young Male professional soccer players. Clin J Sport Med. 2015;25(6):e71-e73. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000153
Kemmler W, Teschler M, Bebenek M, von Stengel S. [(Very) high creatin kinase concentration after exertional whole-body electromyostimulation application: health risks and longitudinal adaptations]. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2015;165(21-22):427-435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-015-0394-1
Mackey AL, Bojsen-Moller J, Qvortrup K, Langberg H, Suetta C, Kalliokoski KK, et al. Evidence of skeletal muscle damage following electrically stimulated isometric muscle contractions in humans. J Appl Physiol. 2008;105(5):1620-1627. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.90952.2008
Malnick SDH, Band Y, Alin P, Maffiuletti NA. It's time to regulate the use of whole body electrical stimulation. BMJ. 2016;352:i1693. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1693
Johannsen AD, Krogh TP. Rhabdomyolysis in an elite dancer after training with electromyostimulation: a case report. TSM. 2019;2(5):294-297. https://doi.org/10.1002/tsm2.91
Stöllberger C, Finsterer J. Side effects of whole-body electro-myo-stimulation. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2019;169(7-8):173-180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-018-0655-x

Auteurs

Nkem Ugonabo (N)

UnionDerm, New York, New York, USA.

Pooja H Rambhia (PH)

Department of Dermatology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.

Janet You (J)

UnionDerm, New York, New York, USA.

Omar A Ibrahimi (OA)

Connecticut Skin Institute, Stamford, Connecticut, USA.

Anne Chapas (A)

UnionDerm, New York, New York, USA.

Classifications MeSH