The learning curve for pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy by using cumulative sum analysis.


Journal

Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada
ISSN: 1911-6470
Titre abrégé: Can Urol Assoc J
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101312644

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
medline: 7 8 2023
pubmed: 7 8 2023
entrez: 7 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study aimed to identify a precise learning curve for pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN). Data from 172 consecutive kidney donors who underwent pure RDN between January 2010 and July 2019 were prospectively collected and evaluated. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used for testing the operation time. Changepoints were determined by using the r program and BINSEG method. The cohort was divided into three groups - group 1: competence, including the first 10 cases; group 2: 11-48 cases as proficiency; and group 3: the subsequent 124 cases as expert level. Continuous variables were evaluated using one-way ANOVA, and categorical data were evaluated using the Chi-squared test. Right RDN was performed in 39 (22.7%) donors. The eighth patient was converted to open surgery due to vena cava injury and excluded from the CUSUM analysis. Depending on experience in pure RDN, a significant decrease was detected in operative time (p<0.001), warm ischemia time (p=0.006), and blood loss (p<0.001). Recipient complications and graft function were found to be statistically comparable. In our study, the attainment of expertise in pure RDN was observed after performing 50 cases. The transperitoneal technique, which is a feasible alternative, is far more widely used than pure RDN. We believe that understanding the learning curve associated with pure RDN could facilitate the adoption of this approach as a viable alternative to the transperitoneal approach.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37549348
pii: cuaj.8372
doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8372
pmc: PMC10657224
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

E369-E373

Références

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 May;30(5):531-537
pubmed: 32208049
Stat Med. 2021 Mar 15;40(6):1400-1413
pubmed: 33316849
J Minim Access Surg. 2017 Jul-Sep;13(3):200-204
pubmed: 28607287
Transplantation. 2016 Nov;100(11):2264-2275
pubmed: 27428715
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Nov;8(6):1795-1801
pubmed: 35469780
Swiss Med Wkly. 2017 Sep 05;147:w14472
pubmed: 28871577
Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2017;8(4):180-185
pubmed: 29321833
J Urol. 2019 Jun;201(6):1199-1205
pubmed: 30633113
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(45):e13116
pubmed: 30407327
BJU Int. 2021 Dec;128(6):688-691
pubmed: 34487399
J Clin Med Res. 2020 Nov;12(11):740-746
pubmed: 33224376
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):1827-1837
pubmed: 33825019

Auteurs

Mehmet Necmettin Mercimek (MN)

Department of Urology, Atasam Hospital, Samsun, Turkey.
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Ender Ozden (E)

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.

Murat Gulsen (M)

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.

Onur Kalayci (O)

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.

Yarkin Kamil Yakupoglu (YK)

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.

Yakup Bostanci (Y)

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.

Saban Sarikaya (S)

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.

Classifications MeSH