Postoperative events and complications of next-day stent removal following uncomplicated percutaneous nephrolithotomy compared to longer stenting.
Journal
Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada
ISSN: 1911-6470
Titre abrégé: Can Urol Assoc J
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101312644
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
medline:
7
8
2023
pubmed:
7
8
2023
entrez:
7
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Options for renal drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) vary and depend primarily on surgeon preference and case considerations. In our practice, patients traditionally returned one week postoperatively to remove the stents in the office via cystoscopy; however, following uncomplicated PCNL with no plans for second-look procedure, a ureteral stent on a tether is currently removed in tandem with the Foley catheter on postoperative day 1 (POD1) prior to patient discharge. This study compared the number of postoperative events between POD1 stent removal and their longer stented counterparts. We conducted a retrospective chart review on all patients who had undergone PCNL at our institution from January 1, 2020, to June 31, 2021. Patient demographics, operative metrics, and postoperative events (telephone calls, emergency department [ED ]/clinic visits, and complications) were recorded and compared between the two groups. A total of 243 patients were included in final analysis: 46% (n=111) had their stent removed on POD1 and 54% (n=132) had longer indwelling stent times. Baseline demographics were similar between the two groups. Number of telephone calls (p=0.081), ED /clinic visits (p=0.093), and complications (p=0.647) were similar between groups. There were three (1.3%) unplanned second-look procedures: two (1.8%) in the POD1 stent removal group and one (0.8%, p=0.475) in the later stent removal group. In this limited, retrospective study, we did not detect a difference in postoperative events or short-term complications for POD1 vs. later stent removal after uncomplicated PCNL.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37549349
pii: cuaj.8364
doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8364
pmc: PMC10657223
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
E381-E387Références
Can J Urol. 2021 Oct;28(5):10865-10870
pubmed: 34657660
Urol Int. 2012;88(3):298-306
pubmed: 22414703
Urol J. 2011 Winter;8(1):21-6
pubmed: 21404198
Urology. 2011 Aug;78(2):277-81
pubmed: 21333334
World J Urol. 2018 Nov;36(11):1871-1876
pubmed: 29761227
Urology. 2012 Apr;79(4):771-6
pubmed: 22130359
Curr Urol. 2018 Feb;11(2):97-102
pubmed: 29593469
J Endourol. 2014 Jun;28(6):644-8
pubmed: 24456239
J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):1065-9; discussion 1069
pubmed: 12576847
Urol Int. 2020;104(5-6):445-451
pubmed: 31955168
J Endourol. 2007 Sep;21(9):973-6
pubmed: 17941771
Prev Med. 2010 Nov;51(5):416-20
pubmed: 20801154
J Endourol. 2004 Aug;18(6):547-9
pubmed: 15333219
Urology. 2022 May;163:196-201
pubmed: 35469809
J Urol. 2021 Sep;206(3):517-525
pubmed: 33904797
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
J Endourol. 2008 Oct;22(10):2245-9
pubmed: 18937589
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208
pubmed: 31078660
J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1161-9
pubmed: 27238615