Alcohol and smoking brief interventions by socioeconomic position: a population-based, cross-sectional study in Great Britain.

cross-sectional studies drinking behaviour general practice smoking socioeconomic position substance intervention

Journal

BJGP open
ISSN: 2398-3795
Titre abrégé: BJGP Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101713531

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 12 05 2023
revised: 17 07 2023
accepted: 23 07 2023
pubmed: 8 8 2023
medline: 8 8 2023
entrez: 7 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Alcohol and smoking brief interventions (BIs) in general practice have been shown to be effective in lowering alcohol and smoking-related harm. To assess prevalence of self-reported BI receipt among increasing or higher-risk drinkers and past-year smokers in England, Scotland, and Wales, and associations between intervention receipt and socioeconomic position. Cross-sectional study using data from a monthly population-based survey in England, Scotland, and Wales. The study comprised 47 799 participants (15 573 increasing or higher-risk drinkers [alcohol use disorders identification test consumption score ≥5] and 7791 past-year smokers) surveyed via telephone in 2020-2022 (during the COVID-19 pandemic). All data were self-reported. Prevalence of self-reported BI receipt was assessed descriptively; associations between receipt and socioeconomic position were analysed using logistic regression. Among adults in England, Scotland, and Wales, 32.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 31.8 to 32.7) reported increasing or higher-risk drinking and 17.7% (95% CI = 17.3 to 18.1) past-year smoking. Among increasing or higher-risk drinkers, 58.0% (95% CI = 57.1 to 58.9) consulted with a GP in the past year, and of these, 4.1% (95% CI = 3.6 to 4.6) reported receiving BIs. Among past-year smokers, 55.8% (95% CI = 54.5 to 57.1) attended general practice in the past year; of these, 41.0% (95% CI = 39.4 to 42.7) stated receiving BIs. There was a tendency for patients from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds to receive more alcohol (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.38, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.73) or smoking BIs (aOR 1.11, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.26), but for the latter the results were statistically non-significant. Results did not differ notably by nation within Great Britain. BIs in general practice are more common for smoking than for alcohol. A greater proportion of BIs for alcohol were found to be delivered to people who were from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds and who were increasing or higher-risk drinkers.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Alcohol and smoking brief interventions (BIs) in general practice have been shown to be effective in lowering alcohol and smoking-related harm.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To assess prevalence of self-reported BI receipt among increasing or higher-risk drinkers and past-year smokers in England, Scotland, and Wales, and associations between intervention receipt and socioeconomic position.
DESIGN & SETTING METHODS
Cross-sectional study using data from a monthly population-based survey in England, Scotland, and Wales.
METHOD METHODS
The study comprised 47 799 participants (15 573 increasing or higher-risk drinkers [alcohol use disorders identification test consumption score ≥5] and 7791 past-year smokers) surveyed via telephone in 2020-2022 (during the COVID-19 pandemic). All data were self-reported. Prevalence of self-reported BI receipt was assessed descriptively; associations between receipt and socioeconomic position were analysed using logistic regression.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among adults in England, Scotland, and Wales, 32.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 31.8 to 32.7) reported increasing or higher-risk drinking and 17.7% (95% CI = 17.3 to 18.1) past-year smoking. Among increasing or higher-risk drinkers, 58.0% (95% CI = 57.1 to 58.9) consulted with a GP in the past year, and of these, 4.1% (95% CI = 3.6 to 4.6) reported receiving BIs. Among past-year smokers, 55.8% (95% CI = 54.5 to 57.1) attended general practice in the past year; of these, 41.0% (95% CI = 39.4 to 42.7) stated receiving BIs. There was a tendency for patients from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds to receive more alcohol (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.38, 95% CI = 1.10 to 1.73) or smoking BIs (aOR 1.11, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.26), but for the latter the results were statistically non-significant. Results did not differ notably by nation within Great Britain.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
BIs in general practice are more common for smoking than for alcohol. A greater proportion of BIs for alcohol were found to be delivered to people who were from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds and who were increasing or higher-risk drinkers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37549977
pii: BJGPO.2023.0087
doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0087
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023, The Authors.

Auteurs

Vera Helen Buss (VH)

Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK v.buss@ucl.ac.uk.
SPECTRUM Research Consortium, Edinburgh, UK.

Sharon Cox (S)

Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
SPECTRUM Research Consortium, Edinburgh, UK.

Graham Moore (G)

SPECTRUM Research Consortium, Edinburgh, UK.
DECIPHer, School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Colin Angus (C)

SPECTRUM Research Consortium, Edinburgh, UK.
Sheffield Alcohol Research Group, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Lion Shahab (L)

Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
SPECTRUM Research Consortium, Edinburgh, UK.

Linda Bauld (L)

SPECTRUM Research Consortium, Edinburgh, UK.
Usher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Jamie Brown (J)

Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
SPECTRUM Research Consortium, Edinburgh, UK.

Classifications MeSH