Linking fine-scale behaviour to the hydraulic environment shows behavioural responses in riverine fish.
Behavioural states
Fine-scale acoustic telemetry
Fish migration
Hidden Markov modelling
Hydrodynamic modelling
Journal
Movement ecology
ISSN: 2051-3933
Titre abrégé: Mov Ecol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101635009
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Aug 2023
07 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
31
03
2023
accepted:
24
07
2023
medline:
8
8
2023
pubmed:
8
8
2023
entrez:
7
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Fish migration has severely been impacted by dam construction. Through the disruption of fish migration routes, freshwater fish communities have seen an incredible decline. Fishways, which have been constructed to mitigate the problem, have been shown to underperform. This is in part due to fish navigation still being largely misunderstood. Recent developments in tracking technology and modelling make it possible today to track (aquatic) animals at very fine spatial (down to one meter) and temporal (down to every second) scales. Hidden Markov models are appropriate models to analyse behavioural states at these fine scales. In this study we link fine-scale tracking data of barbel (Barbus barbus) and grayling (Thymallus thymallus) to a fine-scale hydrodynamic model. With a HMM we analyse the fish's behavioural switches to understand their movement and navigation behaviour near a barrier and fishway outflow in the Iller river in Southern Germany. Fish were tracked with acoustic telemetry as they approached a hydropower facility and were presented with a fishway. Tracking resulted in fish tracks with variable intervals between subsequent fish positions. This variability stems from both a variable interval between tag emissions and missing detections within a track. After track regularisation hidden Markov models were fitted using different parameters. The tested parameters are step length, straightness index calculated over a 3-min moving window, and straightness index calculated over a 10-min window. The best performing model (based on a selection by AIC) was then expanded by allowing flow velocity and spatial velocity gradient to affect the transition matrix between behavioural states. In this study it was found that using step length to identify behavioural states with hidden Markov models underperformed when compared to models constructed using straightness index. Of the two different straightness indices assessed, the index calculated over a 10-min moving window performed better. Linking behavioural states to the ecohydraulic environment showed an effect of the spatial velocity gradient on behavioural switches. On the contrary, flow velocity did not show an effect on the behavioural transition matrix. We found that behavioural switches were affected by the spatial velocity gradient caused by the attraction flow coming from the fishway. Insight into fish navigation and fish reactions to the ecohydraulic environment can aid in the construction of fishways and improve overall fishway efficiencies, thereby helping to mitigate the effects migration barriers have on the aquatic ecosystem.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Fish migration has severely been impacted by dam construction. Through the disruption of fish migration routes, freshwater fish communities have seen an incredible decline. Fishways, which have been constructed to mitigate the problem, have been shown to underperform. This is in part due to fish navigation still being largely misunderstood. Recent developments in tracking technology and modelling make it possible today to track (aquatic) animals at very fine spatial (down to one meter) and temporal (down to every second) scales. Hidden Markov models are appropriate models to analyse behavioural states at these fine scales. In this study we link fine-scale tracking data of barbel (Barbus barbus) and grayling (Thymallus thymallus) to a fine-scale hydrodynamic model. With a HMM we analyse the fish's behavioural switches to understand their movement and navigation behaviour near a barrier and fishway outflow in the Iller river in Southern Germany.
METHODS
METHODS
Fish were tracked with acoustic telemetry as they approached a hydropower facility and were presented with a fishway. Tracking resulted in fish tracks with variable intervals between subsequent fish positions. This variability stems from both a variable interval between tag emissions and missing detections within a track. After track regularisation hidden Markov models were fitted using different parameters. The tested parameters are step length, straightness index calculated over a 3-min moving window, and straightness index calculated over a 10-min window. The best performing model (based on a selection by AIC) was then expanded by allowing flow velocity and spatial velocity gradient to affect the transition matrix between behavioural states.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In this study it was found that using step length to identify behavioural states with hidden Markov models underperformed when compared to models constructed using straightness index. Of the two different straightness indices assessed, the index calculated over a 10-min moving window performed better. Linking behavioural states to the ecohydraulic environment showed an effect of the spatial velocity gradient on behavioural switches. On the contrary, flow velocity did not show an effect on the behavioural transition matrix.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We found that behavioural switches were affected by the spatial velocity gradient caused by the attraction flow coming from the fishway. Insight into fish navigation and fish reactions to the ecohydraulic environment can aid in the construction of fishways and improve overall fishway efficiencies, thereby helping to mitigate the effects migration barriers have on the aquatic ecosystem.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37550738
doi: 10.1186/s40462-023-00413-1
pii: 10.1186/s40462-023-00413-1
pmc: PMC10408093
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
50Subventions
Organisme : MSCA Ribes
ID : Grant Agreement No. 860800
Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Cogn Process. 2012 Aug;13 Suppl 1:S107-11
pubmed: 22915259
Ecology. 2008 May;89(5):1208-15
pubmed: 18543615
Science. 2022 Feb 18;375(6582):eabg1780
pubmed: 35175823
Nature. 2020 Dec;588(7838):436-441
pubmed: 33328667
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 30;7(1):14294
pubmed: 29084968
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jul 22;282(1811):
pubmed: 26136454
Aquat Sci. 2015;77(3):315-324
pubmed: 26321853
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 4;9(1):5642
pubmed: 30948786
Ecol Evol. 2021 Dec 09;11(24):17786-17800
pubmed: 35003639
J R Soc Interface. 2013 Nov 27;11(91):20130814
pubmed: 24284893
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Feb 1;578:109-120
pubmed: 27839764
Ecology. 2012 Nov;93(11):2336-42
pubmed: 23236905
Mov Ecol. 2016 Sep 01;4(1):21
pubmed: 27595001