Ultrasound assessment of endotracheal tube depth in neonates: a prospective feasibility study.

Intensive Care Units, Neonatal Neonatology Respiratory Medicine

Journal

Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition
ISSN: 1468-2052
Titre abrégé: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9501297

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 23 05 2023
accepted: 28 07 2023
medline: 9 8 2023
pubmed: 9 8 2023
entrez: 8 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To examine the reliability of a novel ultrasound (US) method for assessment of endotracheal tube (ETT) position in neonates. Prospective, observational, single-centre, feasibility study. Level III neonatal intensive care unit. Term and preterm neonates requiring endotracheal intubation. US measurement of the ETT tip to right pulmonary artery (RPA) distance was used to determine ETT position according to one-fourth to three-fourths estimated tracheal length for weight. US demonstration of pleural sliding and diaphragmatic movement was also assessed. Chest radiography (CXR) was performed following each intubation. Agreement between US assessment of ETT tip position and CXR served as the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for each US method and correlation between ETT tip to RPA distance on US, and ETT tip to carina distance on CXR were assessed. Forty-two US studies were performed on 33 intubated neonates. US evaluation of ETT-RPA distance identified 100% of ETTs positioned correctly: 77% deep and 80% high, demonstrating strong agreement with CXR (kappa=0.822). Sensitivity was 78%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100% and negative predictive value 86%. US ETT-RPA distance strongly correlated with CXR ETT-carina distance (r=0.826). No significant agreement was found between CXR and US assessment of pleural sliding and diaphragmatic movement. No adverse events were encountered during US scans. US evaluation of ETT-RPA distance demonstrated excellent accuracy for determining ETT position in neonates compared with CXR. More research is needed to support its feasibility in clinical settings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37553228
pii: archdischild-2023-325855
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325855
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Orly Levkovitz (O)

Department of Neonatology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel orly.levko@gmail.com.

Dana Schujovitzky (D)

Pediatrics, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.

Rodica Stackievicz (R)

Department of Radiology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.

Pierre Fayoux (P)

Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Université de Lille, Lille, France.

Iris Morag (I)

Department of Neonatology, Shamir Medical Center Assaf Harofeh, Tzrifin, Israel.
Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Ita Litmanovitz (I)

Department of Neonatology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.
Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Shmuel Arnon (S)

Department of Neonatology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.
Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Sofia Bauer (S)

Department of Neonatology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.

Classifications MeSH