Anesthesia Workspaces for Safe Medication Practices: Design Guidelines.

anesthesia workspace evidence-based design guidelines interruptions medication tasks operating room

Journal

HERD
ISSN: 2167-5112
Titre abrégé: HERD
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101537529

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Historique:
pubmed: 9 8 2023
medline: 9 8 2023
entrez: 9 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Studies show that workspace for the anesthesia providers is prone to interruptions and distractions. Anesthesia providers experience difficulties while performing critical medication tasks such as medication preparation and administration due to poor ergonomics and configurations of workspace, equipment clutter, and limited space which ultimately may impact patient safety, length of surgery, and cost of care delivery. Therefore, improving design of anesthesia workspace for supporting safe and efficient medication practices is paramount. The objective of this study was to develop a set of evidence-based design guidelines focusing on design of anesthesia workspace to support safer anesthesia medication tasks in operating rooms (ORs). Data collection was based on literature review, observation, and coding of more than 30 prerecorded videos of outpatient surgical procedures to identify challenges experienced by anesthesia providers while performing medication tasks. Guidelines were then reviewed and validated using short survey. Findings are summarized into seven evidence-based design guidelines, including (1) locate critical tasks within a primary field of vision, (2) eliminate travel into and through the anesthesia zone (for other staff), (3) identify and demarcate a distinct anesthesia zone with adequate space for the anesthesia provider, (4) optimize the ability to reposition/reconfigure the anesthesia workspace, (5) minimize clutter from equipment, (6) provide adequate and appropriately positioned surfaces for medication preparation and administration, and (7) optimize task and surface lighting. This study finds many areas for improving design of ORs. Improvements of anesthesia work area will call for contribution and cooperation of entire surgical team.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
Studies show that workspace for the anesthesia providers is prone to interruptions and distractions. Anesthesia providers experience difficulties while performing critical medication tasks such as medication preparation and administration due to poor ergonomics and configurations of workspace, equipment clutter, and limited space which ultimately may impact patient safety, length of surgery, and cost of care delivery. Therefore, improving design of anesthesia workspace for supporting safe and efficient medication practices is paramount.
OBJECTIVES UNASSIGNED
The objective of this study was to develop a set of evidence-based design guidelines focusing on design of anesthesia workspace to support safer anesthesia medication tasks in operating rooms (ORs).
METHODS UNASSIGNED
Data collection was based on literature review, observation, and coding of more than 30 prerecorded videos of outpatient surgical procedures to identify challenges experienced by anesthesia providers while performing medication tasks. Guidelines were then reviewed and validated using short survey.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
Findings are summarized into seven evidence-based design guidelines, including (1) locate critical tasks within a primary field of vision, (2) eliminate travel into and through the anesthesia zone (for other staff), (3) identify and demarcate a distinct anesthesia zone with adequate space for the anesthesia provider, (4) optimize the ability to reposition/reconfigure the anesthesia workspace, (5) minimize clutter from equipment, (6) provide adequate and appropriately positioned surfaces for medication preparation and administration, and (7) optimize task and surface lighting.
CONCLUSION UNASSIGNED
This study finds many areas for improving design of ORs. Improvements of anesthesia work area will call for contribution and cooperation of entire surgical team.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37553817
doi: 10.1177/19375867231190646
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

64-83

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Soheyla MohammadiGorji (S)

Interior Design, FINA, College of Health & Social Sciences, San Francisco State University, CA, USA.

Anjali Joseph (A)

Center for Health Facilities Design and Testing, School of Architecture, College of Architecture, Arts and Humanities, Clemson University, SC, USA.

Sahar Mihandoust (S)

Center for Health Facilities Design and Testing, School of Architecture, College of Architecture, Arts and Humanities, Clemson University, SC, USA.

Seyedmohammad Ahmadshahi (S)

Center for Health Facilities Design and Testing, School of Architecture, College of Architecture, Arts and Humanities, Clemson University, SC, USA.

David Allison (D)

Center for Health Facilities Design and Testing, School of Architecture, College of Architecture, Arts and Humanities, Clemson University, SC, USA.

Ken Catchpole (K)

Center for Health Facilities Design and Testing, School of Architecture, College of Architecture, Arts and Humanities, Clemson University, SC, USA.
Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

David Neyens (D)

Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, Computing and Applied Sciences, Clemson University, SC, USA.

James H Abernathy (JH)

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Classifications MeSH