Crocodile perception of distress in hominid baby cries.
animal communication
baby cries
crocodiles
cross-species communication
distress vocalizations
nonlinear acoustic phenomena
Journal
Proceedings. Biological sciences
ISSN: 1471-2954
Titre abrégé: Proc Biol Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245157
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 08 2023
09 08 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
09
08
2024
medline:
10
8
2023
pubmed:
9
8
2023
entrez:
9
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It is generally argued that distress vocalizations, a common modality for alerting conspecifics across a wide range of terrestrial vertebrates, share acoustic features that allow heterospecific communication. Yet studies suggest that the acoustic traits used to decode distress may vary between species, leading to decoding errors. Here we found through playback experiments that Nile crocodiles are attracted to infant hominid cries (bonobo, chimpanzee and human), and that the intensity of crocodile response depends critically on a set of specific acoustic features (mainly deterministic chaos, harmonicity and spectral prominences). Our results suggest that crocodiles are sensitive to the degree of distress encoded in the vocalizations of phylogenetically very distant vertebrates. A comparison of these results with those obtained with human subjects confronted with the same stimuli further indicates that crocodiles and humans use different acoustic criteria to assess the distress encoded in infant cries. Interestingly, the acoustic features driving crocodile reaction are likely to be more reliable markers of distress than those used by humans. These results highlight that the acoustic features encoding information in vertebrate sound signals are not necessarily identical across species.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37554035
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.0201
pmc: PMC10410202
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20230201Références
iScience. 2023 Mar 17;26(4):106441
pubmed: 37035010
Animals (Basel). 2020 Dec 14;10(12):
pubmed: 33327613
Behav Processes. 1991 Mar;23(2):103-11
pubmed: 24897723
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 14;288(1954):20210872
pubmed: 34229494
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Sep;130(3):1700-10
pubmed: 21895107
Behav Processes. 2013 Jan;92:15-23
pubmed: 23022571
Folia Primatol (Basel). 1999 Nov-Dec;70(6):328-57
pubmed: 10640882
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Mar;125(3):1792-805
pubmed: 19275336
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Dec 2;7(12):201306
pubmed: 33489278
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Aug 9;290(2004):20230201
pubmed: 37554035
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 12;9(3):e91192
pubmed: 24621604
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2002 Apr;188(3):217-23
pubmed: 11976890
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Apr 27;289(1973):20220429
pubmed: 35473375
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Oct 7;277(1696):2895-904
pubmed: 20685706
J Comp Psychol. 2010 Feb;124(1):81-91
pubmed: 20175599
Naturwissenschaften. 2007 Jan;94(1):49-54
pubmed: 17106675
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Jul 26;284(1859):
pubmed: 28747478
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009 Aug;84(3):391-411
pubmed: 19659884
Anim Cogn. 2012 Nov;15(6):1095-109
pubmed: 22820991
Biol Lett. 2014 Jan 08;10(1):20130926
pubmed: 24402716
Am Nat. 2014 Oct;184(4):510-22
pubmed: 25226186
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 24;11(1):4468
pubmed: 33627739
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 5;11(1):19723
pubmed: 34611191
J Comp Psychol. 2015 May;129(2):121-31
pubmed: 25798794
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 May 17;4(5):170134
pubmed: 28573021
Curr Biol. 2009 Jul 14;19(13):R507-8
pubmed: 19602409
Zoology (Jena). 2011 Dec;114(6):313-20
pubmed: 21978842