Can Symmetry of Single-Leg Vertical Jump Height Represent Normal Lower Limb Biomechanics of Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction biomechanics horizontal hop limb symmetry index return to sport vertical jump

Journal

Sports health
ISSN: 1941-0921
Titre abrégé: Sports Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101518422

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Aug 2023
Historique:
medline: 9 8 2023
pubmed: 9 8 2023
entrez: 9 8 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

After anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), single-leg horizontal hop distance limb symmetry index (LSI) >90% is recommended as a cutoff point for safe return to sport (RTS). However, athletes after ACLR have abnormal lower limb biomechanics despite an adequate single-leg hop distance LSI, implying that athletes are at high risk of reinjury. Symmetry of single-leg vertical jump height appears to be more difficult to achieve and can be a better representation of knee function than single-leg horizontal hop distance. Athletes after ACLR with single-leg jump height LSI >90% had similar biomechanical characteristics to healthy athletes. Controlled laboratory study. Level 3. A total of 46 athletes after ACLR were divided into low jump height (LJH, jump height LSI <90%, n = 23) and high jump height (HJH, jump height LSI >90%, n = 23) groups according to symmetry of single-leg vertical jump height, while 24 healthy athletes acted as a control (CONT) group. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the kinematic and kinetic characteristics of the LJH, HJH, and CONT groups during single-leg vertical jump. Both the LJH and HJH groups demonstrated greater limb asymmetry (lower LSI) during landing compared with the CONT group in knee extension moment ( Symmetry in single-leg vertical jump height does not represent normal lower limb biomechanics in athletes after ACLR. Symmetrical jump height may not signify ideal biomechanical or RTS readiness, but single-leg vertical jump test can be used as a supplement to horizontal hop test or other functional tests to reduce the likelihood of false-negative results in the absence of detailed biomechanical evaluation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
After anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), single-leg horizontal hop distance limb symmetry index (LSI) >90% is recommended as a cutoff point for safe return to sport (RTS). However, athletes after ACLR have abnormal lower limb biomechanics despite an adequate single-leg hop distance LSI, implying that athletes are at high risk of reinjury. Symmetry of single-leg vertical jump height appears to be more difficult to achieve and can be a better representation of knee function than single-leg horizontal hop distance.
HYPOTHESIS UNASSIGNED
Athletes after ACLR with single-leg jump height LSI >90% had similar biomechanical characteristics to healthy athletes.
STUDY DESIGN UNASSIGNED
Controlled laboratory study.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE UNASSIGNED
Level 3.
METHODS UNASSIGNED
A total of 46 athletes after ACLR were divided into low jump height (LJH, jump height LSI <90%, n = 23) and high jump height (HJH, jump height LSI >90%, n = 23) groups according to symmetry of single-leg vertical jump height, while 24 healthy athletes acted as a control (CONT) group. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the kinematic and kinetic characteristics of the LJH, HJH, and CONT groups during single-leg vertical jump.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
Both the LJH and HJH groups demonstrated greater limb asymmetry (lower LSI) during landing compared with the CONT group in knee extension moment (
CONCLUSION UNASSIGNED
Symmetry in single-leg vertical jump height does not represent normal lower limb biomechanics in athletes after ACLR.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE UNASSIGNED
Symmetrical jump height may not signify ideal biomechanical or RTS readiness, but single-leg vertical jump test can be used as a supplement to horizontal hop test or other functional tests to reduce the likelihood of false-negative results in the absence of detailed biomechanical evaluation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37554095
doi: 10.1177/19417381231190119
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

19417381231190119

Auteurs

Peng Chen (P)

School of Sports Medicine, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Key Laboratory of Sports Engineering of General Administration of Sport of China, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.

Ling Wang (L)

School of Sports Medicine, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Key Laboratory of Sports Engineering of General Administration of Sport of China, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.

Shiyu Dong (S)

College of Basic Medicine of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China.

Yue Ding (Y)

School of Sports Medicine, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Key Laboratory of Sports Engineering of General Administration of Sport of China, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.

Shaohui Jia (S)

School of Sports Medicine, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Sports Training and Monitoring, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.

Cheng Zheng (C)

Department of Sports Medicine, Affiliated Hospital, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.

Classifications MeSH