Predictors and a prediction model for positive fine needle aspiration biopsy in C-TIRADS 4 thyroid nodules.
95% Cl=0.296~0.666
C-TIRADS
fine needle aspiration biopsy
low echo (OR=3.549)
prediction model 444
predictor
thyroid nodules
Journal
Frontiers in endocrinology
ISSN: 1664-2392
Titre abrégé: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555782
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
31
01
2023
accepted:
04
07
2023
medline:
10
8
2023
pubmed:
9
8
2023
entrez:
9
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To screen out the predictors and establish a prediction model of positive fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the Chinese Guidelines for Malignant Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodule Ultrasound (C-TIRADS) 4 thyroid nodules, and this nomogram can help clinicians evaluate the risk of positive FNAB and determine if FNAB is necessary. We retrospectively analyzed data from 547 patients who had C-TIRADS 4 thyroid nodules and underwent fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between November 30, 2021 and September 5, 2022. Patients who met our inclusion criteria were divided into two groups based on positive or negative FNAB results. We compared their ultrasound (US) features, BRAF V600E status, thyroid function, and other general characteristics using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify independent predictors. These predictors were then used to construct a nomogram. The calibration plot, area under the curve (AUC), and decision curve analysis were employed to evaluate the calibration, discrimination, and clinical utility of the prediction model. Out of 547 patients, 39.3% (215/547) had a positive result on fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), while 60.7% (332/547) had a negative result. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed no significant differences in TPOAb, TgAb, TSH, Tg, nodule location, sex, or solid status between the two groups (P>0.05). However, age, nodule size, internal or surrounding blood flow signal, microcalcifications, aspect ratio, morphology, and low echo showed significant differences (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the correlation between potential independent predictors. The results showed that only age (OR=0.444, 95% Cl=0.296~0.666, P<0.001), low echo (OR=3.549, 95% Cl=2.319~5.432, P<0.001), microcalcifications (OR=2.531, 95% Cl=1.661~3.856, P<0.001), aspect ratio (OR=3.032, 95% Cl=1.819~5.052, P<0.001), and morphology (OR=2.437, 95% Cl=1.586~3.745, P<0.001) were independent predictors for a positive FNAB. These variables were used to construct a prediction nomogram. An ROC curve analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of the nomogram, and AUC=0.793, which indicated good discrimination and decision curve analysis demonstrated clinical significance within a threshold range of 14% to 91%. In conclusion, 5 independent predictors of positive FNAB, including age (≤45 years old), low echo (yes), microcalcifications (yes), aspect ratio (>1) and morphology (irregular), were identified. A nomogram was established based on the above 5 predictors, and the nomogram can be used as a complementary basis to help clinicians make decisions on FNAB of C-TI-RADS 4 thyroid nodules.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37554760
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1154984
pmc: PMC10405816
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1154984Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Yang, Gao and Yang.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors state that there were no commercial or financial relationships that could potentially create conflicts of interest during the course of this research.
Références
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Jan 1;104(1):95-102
pubmed: 30299457
Oncol Lett. 2019 Sep;18(3):2995-3002
pubmed: 31452778
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Aug;11(8):3604-3618
pubmed: 34341735
BMC Cancer. 2014 Nov 24;14:873
pubmed: 25421041
Radiology. 2011 Sep;260(3):892-9
pubmed: 21771959
Biomed Pharmacother. 2006 Sep;60(8):414-24
pubmed: 16959467
Radiology. 2008 Jun;247(3):762-70
pubmed: 18403624
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2021 Jun;22(2):453-460
pubmed: 32959174
Thyroid. 2016 Jan;26(1):1-133
pubmed: 26462967
Acta Med Indones. 2016 Jul;48(3):247-257
pubmed: 27840362
World J Surg. 2008 Sep;32(9):1948-54
pubmed: 18443853
J Nucl Med. 2021 Jul;62(Suppl 2):13S-19S
pubmed: 34230067
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Apr;16(4):e173-80
pubmed: 25846097
Thyroid. 2016 Apr;26(4):562-72
pubmed: 26756476
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jun;65(3):309-316
pubmed: 33665957
Clin Chem. 2005 Apr;51(4):729-34
pubmed: 15695326
Thyroid. 2020 Mar;30(3):401-407
pubmed: 31910102
Clin Imaging. 2004 Sep-Oct;28(5):368-71
pubmed: 15471671
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 May;214(5):1152-1157
pubmed: 32097031
Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):29-36
pubmed: 29558300
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Jan 23;10:907
pubmed: 32038482
JAMA. 2018 Mar 06;319(9):914-924
pubmed: 29509871
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2014 Oct;21(5):394-404
pubmed: 25122493
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015 Aug;53(9):1301-14
pubmed: 25355247
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020 Jan;102(1):43-48
pubmed: 31865760
Eur J Endocrinol. 2014 Apr 10;170(5):R203-11
pubmed: 24536085
J Clin Ultrasound. 2022 Nov;50(9):1345-1352
pubmed: 36169185
J Ultrason. 2022 Apr 27;22(89):130-135
pubmed: 35811592
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Apr;99(4):1253-63
pubmed: 24276450
Radiographics. 2007 May-Jun;27(3):847-60; discussion 861-5
pubmed: 17495296
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Dec;100(12):4434-40
pubmed: 26465395
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Nov;91(11):4295-301
pubmed: 16868053
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2016 Apr-Jun;14(2):119-23
pubmed: 27462883
Cureus. 2020 Mar 30;12(3):e7478
pubmed: 32351856
Clin Imaging. 2010 Mar-Apr;34(2):127-33
pubmed: 20189077
Acta Cytol. 2012;56(4):333-9
pubmed: 22846422
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Sep 1;105(9):
pubmed: 32491169
Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8
pubmed: 11846609
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Mar;93(3):809-14
pubmed: 18160464
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009 Aug;71(2):157-65
pubmed: 19170717
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 May;14(5):587-595
pubmed: 28372962
Endocrine. 2020 Nov;70(2):256-279
pubmed: 32827126
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 27;12:789310
pubmed: 35154002
QJM. 2007 Jan;100(1):29-35
pubmed: 17178736
J Surg Res. 2013 Oct;184(2):761-5
pubmed: 23623584