Quantitative evaluation of the influence of multiple MRI sequences and of pathological tissues on the registration of longitudinal data acquired during brain tumor treatment.
MRI
brain
convolutional neural network
deep learning
image registration
tumor
Journal
Frontiers in neuroimaging
ISSN: 2813-1193
Titre abrégé: Front Neuroimaging
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9918402387106676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
24
06
2022
accepted:
15
08
2022
medline:
9
8
2023
pubmed:
9
8
2023
entrez:
9
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Registration methods facilitate the comparison of multiparametric magnetic resonance images acquired at different stages of brain tumor treatments. Image-based registration solutions are influenced by the sequences chosen to compute the distance measure, and the lack of image correspondences due to the resection cavities and pathological tissues. Nonetheless, an evaluation of the impact of these input parameters on the registration of longitudinal data is still missing. This work evaluates the influence of multiple sequences, namely T1-weighted (T1), T2-weighted (T2), contrast enhanced T1-weighted (T1-CE), and T2 Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR), and the exclusion of the pathological tissues on the non-rigid registration of pre- and post-operative images. We here investigate two types of registration methods, an iterative approach and a convolutional neural network solution based on a 3D U-Net. We employ two test sets to compute the mean target registration error (mTRE) based on corresponding landmarks. In the first set, markers are positioned exclusively in the surroundings of the pathology. The methods employing T1-CE achieves the lowest mTREs, with a improvement up to 0.8 mm for the iterative solution. The results are higher than the baseline when using the FLAIR sequence. When excluding the pathology, lower mTREs are observable for most of the methods. In the second test set, corresponding landmarks are located in the entire brain volumes. Both solutions employing T1-CE obtain the lowest mTREs, with a decrease up to 1.16 mm for the iterative method, whereas the results worsen using the FLAIR. When excluding the pathology, an improvement is observable for the CNN method using T1-CE. Both approaches utilizing the T1-CE sequence obtain the best mTREs, whereas the FLAIR is the least informative to guide the registration process. Besides, the exclusion of pathology from the distance measure computation improves the registration of the brain tissues surrounding the tumor. Thus, this work provides the first numerical evaluation of the influence of these parameters on the registration of longitudinal magnetic resonance images, and it can be helpful for developing future algorithms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37555157
doi: 10.3389/fnimg.2022.977491
pmc: PMC10406206
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
977491Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Canalini, Klein, Waldmannstetter, Kofler, Cerri, Hering, Heldmann, Schlaeger, Menze, Wiestler, Kirschke and Hahn.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2006;9(Pt 2):726-33
pubmed: 17354837
Neuro Oncol. 2015 Sep;17(9):1188-98
pubmed: 26250565
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:4893-6
pubmed: 22255435
NMR Biomed. 2016 Jul;29(7):882-9
pubmed: 27120035
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Dec;48(13):4445-4455
pubmed: 34173008
Sci Data. 2017 Sep 05;4:170117
pubmed: 28872634
Brainlesion. 2019;11383:105-114
pubmed: 31259320
Med Image Anal. 2008 Feb;12(1):26-41
pubmed: 17659998
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014 Mar;33(3):651-67
pubmed: 24595340
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019 Oct;14(10):1697-1713
pubmed: 31392670
Neuroimage. 2009 Jul 1;46(3):786-802
pubmed: 19195496
Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2010 Apr 14;2010:1025-1028
pubmed: 21804926
Front Neurosci. 2020 Apr 29;14:125
pubmed: 32410929
Acad Radiol. 2008 Aug;15(8):966-77
pubmed: 18620117
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019 Nov;14(11):1901-1912
pubmed: 31538274
Med Image Anal. 2021 Aug;72:102139
pubmed: 34216959
Front Comput Neurosci. 2020 Mar 20;14:17
pubmed: 32265680
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014 Oct;33(10):2039-65
pubmed: 24951685
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Oct;34(10):1993-2024
pubmed: 25494501
J Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;127(2):417-425
pubmed: 27767397