autohrf-an R package for generating data-informed event models for general linear modeling of task-based fMRI data.

GLM R assumed modeling autohrf fMRI task-related activity

Journal

Frontiers in neuroimaging
ISSN: 2813-1193
Titre abrégé: Front Neuroimaging
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9918402387106676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 30 06 2022
accepted: 15 11 2022
medline: 9 8 2023
pubmed: 9 8 2023
entrez: 9 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The analysis of task-related fMRI data at the level of individual participants is commonly based on general linear modeling (GLM), which allows us to estimate the extent to which the BOLD signal can be explained by the task response predictors specified in the event model. The predictors are constructed by convolving the hypothesized time course of neural activity with an assumed hemodynamic response function (HRF). However, our assumptions about the components of brain activity, including their onset and duration, may be incorrect. Their timing may also differ across brain regions or from person to person, leading to inappropriate or suboptimal models, poor fit of the model to actual data, and invalid estimates of brain activity. Here, we present an approach that uses theoretically driven models of task response to define constraints on which the final model is computationally derived using actual fMRI data. Specifically, we developed autohrf-an R package that enables the evaluation and data-driven estimation of event models for GLM analysis. The highlight of the package is the automated parameter search that uses genetic algorithms to find the onset and duration of task predictors that result in the highest fitness of GLM based on the fMRI signal under predefined constraints. We evaluated the usefulness of the autohrf package on two original datasets of task-related fMRI activity, a slow event-related spatial working memory study and a mixed state-item study using the flanker task, and on a simulated slow event-related working memory data. Our results suggest that autohrf can be used to efficiently construct and evaluate better task-related brain activity models to gain a deeper understanding of BOLD task response and improve the validity of model estimates. Our study also highlights the sensitivity of fMRI analysis with GLM to precise event model specification and the need for model evaluation, especially in complex and overlapping event designs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37555164
doi: 10.3389/fnimg.2022.983324
pmc: PMC10406192
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

983324

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Purg, Demšar, Anticevic and Repovš.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

JD consults for Manifest Technologies. AA and GR consult for and hold equity in Neumora Therapeutics and Manifest Technologies. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Aug;28(8):764-84
pubmed: 17094118
Neuroimage. 1998 Nov;8(4):360-9
pubmed: 9811554
Magn Reson Med. 1998 Jun;39(6):855-64
pubmed: 9621908
Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 15;82:433-48
pubmed: 23735261
Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 15;80:105-24
pubmed: 23668970
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Oct;80(4):1697-1713
pubmed: 29656446
Neuroimage. 2021 Dec 1;244:118591
pubmed: 34560269
Nature. 2001 Jul 12;412(6843):150-7
pubmed: 11449264
Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 1;104:209-20
pubmed: 25304775
Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):1014-32
pubmed: 12880829
Physiol Behav. 2002 Dec;77(4-5):477-82
pubmed: 12526986
Front Neurosci. 2014 Jan 21;8:1
pubmed: 24478622
Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1639-51
pubmed: 15050587
Neuroimage. 1999 Apr;9(4):416-29
pubmed: 10191170
Neuroimage. 2014 May 15;92:381-97
pubmed: 24530839
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):1152-6
pubmed: 21963919
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):1157-62
pubmed: 22037002
J Neurosci. 1996 Jul 1;16(13):4207-21
pubmed: 8753882
Front Neuroinform. 2023 Apr 05;17:1104508
pubmed: 37090033
Brain Imaging Behav. 2021 Jun;15(3):1622-1640
pubmed: 32761566
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Apr 20;16:821545
pubmed: 35517989
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Apr 13;19:320-330
pubmed: 30013915
Neuroimage. 1997 Aug;6(2):93-103
pubmed: 9299383
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Oct;33:17-26
pubmed: 29158072
Neuroimage. 2022 Feb 15;247:118844
pubmed: 34942367
Neuroimage. 1998 Jan;7(1):30-40
pubmed: 9500830
Nature. 2016 Aug 11;536(7615):171-178
pubmed: 27437579
Neuroimage. 2000 Jun;11(6 Pt 1):735-59
pubmed: 10860799

Auteurs

Nina Purg (N)

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Jure Demšar (J)

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Alan Anticevic (A)

Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Department of Psychology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.

Grega Repovš (G)

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Classifications MeSH