Using Presurgical Biopsychosocial Features to Develop an Advanced Clinical Decision-Making Support Tool for Predicting Recovery Trajectories in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study.

biopsychosocial clinical decision support knee arthroplasty patient recruitment patient stratification patient-reported outcome patient-reported outcomes predictive clinical decision tool presurgery prospective psychosocial quality of life recovery trajectories rehabilitation total knee arthroplasty

Journal

JMIR research protocols
ISSN: 1929-0748
Titre abrégé: JMIR Res Protoc
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101599504

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 07 05 2023
accepted: 05 07 2023
revised: 12 06 2023
medline: 9 8 2023
pubmed: 9 8 2023
entrez: 9 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), 10% to 20% of patients report dissatisfaction with procedural outcomes. There is growing recognition that postsurgical satisfaction is shaped not only by the quality of surgery but also by psychological and social factors. Surprisingly, information on the psychological and social determinants of surgical outcomes is rarely collected before surgery. A comprehensive collection of biopsychosocial information could assist clinicians in making recommendations in relation to rehabilitation, particularly if there is robust evidence to support the ability of presurgical constructs to predict postsurgical outcomes. Clinical decision support tools can help identify factors influencing patient outcomes and support the provision of interventions or services that can be tailored to meet individuals' needs. However, despite their potential clinical benefit, the application of such tools remains limited. This study aims to develop a clinical decision tool that will assist with patient stratification and more precisely targeted clinical decision-making regarding prehabilitation and rehabilitation for TKA, based on the identified individual biopsychosocial needs. In this prospective observational study, all participants provided written or electronic consent before study commencement. Patient-completed questionnaires captured information related to a broad range of biopsychosocial parameters during the month preceding TKA. These included demographic factors (sex, age, and rurality), psychological factors (mood status, pain catastrophizing, resilience, and committed action), quality of life, social support, lifestyle factors, and knee symptoms. Physical measures assessing mobility, balance, and functional lower body strength were performed via video calls with patients in their home. Information related to preexisting health issues and concomitant medications was derived from hospital medical records. Patient recovery outcomes were assessed 3 months after the surgical procedure and included quality of life, patient-reported knee symptoms, satisfaction with the surgical procedure, and mood status. Machine learning data analysis techniques will be applied to determine which presurgery parameters have the strongest power for predicting patient recovery following total knee replacement. On the basis of these analyses, a predictive model will be developed. Predictive models will undergo internal validation, and Bayesian analysis will be applied to provide additional metrics regarding prediction accuracy. Patient recruitment and data collection commenced in November 2019 and was completed in June 2022. A total of 1050 patients who underwent TKA were enrolled in this study. Our findings will facilitate the development of the first comprehensive biopsychosocial prediction tool, which has the potential to objectively predict a patient's individual recovery outcomes following TKA once selected by an orthopedic surgeon to undergo TKA. If successful, the tool could also inform the evolution rehabilitation services, such that factors in addition to physical performance can be addressed and have the potential to further enhance patient recovery and satisfaction. DERR1-10.2196/48801.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), 10% to 20% of patients report dissatisfaction with procedural outcomes. There is growing recognition that postsurgical satisfaction is shaped not only by the quality of surgery but also by psychological and social factors. Surprisingly, information on the psychological and social determinants of surgical outcomes is rarely collected before surgery. A comprehensive collection of biopsychosocial information could assist clinicians in making recommendations in relation to rehabilitation, particularly if there is robust evidence to support the ability of presurgical constructs to predict postsurgical outcomes. Clinical decision support tools can help identify factors influencing patient outcomes and support the provision of interventions or services that can be tailored to meet individuals' needs. However, despite their potential clinical benefit, the application of such tools remains limited.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aims to develop a clinical decision tool that will assist with patient stratification and more precisely targeted clinical decision-making regarding prehabilitation and rehabilitation for TKA, based on the identified individual biopsychosocial needs.
METHODS METHODS
In this prospective observational study, all participants provided written or electronic consent before study commencement. Patient-completed questionnaires captured information related to a broad range of biopsychosocial parameters during the month preceding TKA. These included demographic factors (sex, age, and rurality), psychological factors (mood status, pain catastrophizing, resilience, and committed action), quality of life, social support, lifestyle factors, and knee symptoms. Physical measures assessing mobility, balance, and functional lower body strength were performed via video calls with patients in their home. Information related to preexisting health issues and concomitant medications was derived from hospital medical records. Patient recovery outcomes were assessed 3 months after the surgical procedure and included quality of life, patient-reported knee symptoms, satisfaction with the surgical procedure, and mood status. Machine learning data analysis techniques will be applied to determine which presurgery parameters have the strongest power for predicting patient recovery following total knee replacement. On the basis of these analyses, a predictive model will be developed. Predictive models will undergo internal validation, and Bayesian analysis will be applied to provide additional metrics regarding prediction accuracy.
RESULTS RESULTS
Patient recruitment and data collection commenced in November 2019 and was completed in June 2022. A total of 1050 patients who underwent TKA were enrolled in this study.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our findings will facilitate the development of the first comprehensive biopsychosocial prediction tool, which has the potential to objectively predict a patient's individual recovery outcomes following TKA once selected by an orthopedic surgeon to undergo TKA. If successful, the tool could also inform the evolution rehabilitation services, such that factors in addition to physical performance can be addressed and have the potential to further enhance patient recovery and satisfaction.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) UNASSIGNED
DERR1-10.2196/48801.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37556181
pii: v12i1e48801
doi: 10.2196/48801
pmc: PMC10448293
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e48801

Informations de copyright

©Karen Ribbons, Sarah Johnson, Elizabeth Ditton, Adrian Wills, Gillian Mason, Traci Flynn, Jodie Cochrane, Michael Pollack, Frederick Rohan Walker, Michael Nilsson. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 09.08.2023.

Références

Age Ageing. 2011 Jul;40(4):423-9
pubmed: 21624928
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2017 Jun;8(2):71-77
pubmed: 28540111
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jan;40(1):67-71
pubmed: 21146770
EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Jun 3;4(6):357-367
pubmed: 31210973
J Orthop. 2022 Jan 15;29:50-59
pubmed: 35125779
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jun;36(6):1908-1914
pubmed: 33648844
Acta Orthop. 2016 Jul;87 Suppl 1:9-23
pubmed: 27228230
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Aug;473(8):2630-8
pubmed: 25791440
Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33
pubmed: 8628042
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Jul;40(14):1718-1731
pubmed: 28330380
Acta Orthop. 2017 Oct;88(5):530-536
pubmed: 28562150
J Clin Med. 2020 May 09;9(5):
pubmed: 32397459
Qual Life Res. 2019 Sep;28(9):2325-2339
pubmed: 30937732
Arch Intern Med. 1998 Sep 14;158(16):1789-95
pubmed: 9738608
Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213
pubmed: 2748771
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Mar;25(3):188-194
pubmed: 28146438
Behav Res Ther. 1995 Mar;33(3):335-43
pubmed: 7726811
Acta Orthop. 2019 Apr;90(2):179-186
pubmed: 30973090
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):57-63
pubmed: 19844772
Eur J Pain. 2015 May;19(5):677-85
pubmed: 25181605
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Feb;30(2):376-388
pubmed: 35006281
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Aug;52(8):1367-72
pubmed: 15271128
Front Psychol. 2020 May 29;11:1061
pubmed: 32670136
J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833-40
pubmed: 3068365
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2018 Jan;25(1):e42-e50
pubmed: 28960667
J Occup Rehabil. 2016 Sep;26(3):286-318
pubmed: 26667939
Qual Life Res. 2014 Dec;23(10):2849-53
pubmed: 24962651
J Behav Med. 2022 Jun;45(3):481-489
pubmed: 35152329
BMJ. 2013 Jan 28;346:f167
pubmed: 23358487
Acta Orthop. 2010 Feb;81(1):82-9
pubmed: 20180723
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Dec;478(12):2768-2783
pubmed: 33044310
Knee. 2017 Oct;24(5):917-924
pubmed: 28666646
Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(3):194-200
pubmed: 18696313
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S79-S85
pubmed: 32151524
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Dec;31(12):2660-2667.e1
pubmed: 27506723
J Arthroplasty. 2021 May;36(5):1832-1845.e1
pubmed: 33288388
J Stud Alcohol. 1995 Jul;56(4):423-32
pubmed: 7674678
Med Care. 2005 Jun;43(6):607-15
pubmed: 15908856
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Aug;94(8):1058-66
pubmed: 22844046
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 21;8(1):3381
pubmed: 29467465
J Arthroplasty. 1998 Dec;13(8):890-5
pubmed: 9880181
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2002 Aug;26(4):343-5
pubmed: 12233955
BMJ. 2020 Mar 18;368:m441
pubmed: 32188600
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 13;10(14):
pubmed: 34300261
Pain Med. 2015 Nov;16(11):2109-20
pubmed: 26031326
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jul;37(7):1266-1272
pubmed: 35202758
Physiother Res Int. 2008 Sep;13(3):141-52
pubmed: 18697226
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Oct;34(10):2337-2346
pubmed: 31229373
Qual Life Res. 2015 Dec;24(12):2917-25
pubmed: 26068733
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Mar;38(3):470-475
pubmed: 36126888
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Aug;31(8):1654-60
pubmed: 26935945
J Arthroplasty. 2001 Jun;16(4):476-82
pubmed: 11402411
Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Oct;45(5):453-61
pubmed: 11642645
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56
pubmed: 11253156
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1171-8
pubmed: 9817135
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 21;8(1):3380
pubmed: 29467402
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Feb 23;20(1):90
pubmed: 30797228
JAMA. 2017 Mar 14;317(10):1037-1046
pubmed: 28291891
Eur J Pain. 2020 Jan;24(1):51-70
pubmed: 31509625
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 May 1;26(9):e191-e193
pubmed: 29688919
Public Health. 2017 Nov;152:157-171
pubmed: 28915435
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;49(12):1373-9
pubmed: 8970487
J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Nov;47(11):1245-51
pubmed: 7722560

Auteurs

Karen Ribbons (K)

Centre for Rehab Innovations, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Sarah Johnson (S)

Centre for Rehab Innovations, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
College of Science and Engineering, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Elizabeth Ditton (E)

Centre for Rehab Innovations, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Adrian Wills (A)

Centre for Rehab Innovations, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
College of Science and Engineering, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Gillian Mason (G)

Hunter Medical Research Institute, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, Australia.

Traci Flynn (T)

College of Human and Social Futures, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Jodie Cochrane (J)

Centre for Rehab Innovations, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
College of Science and Engineering, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Michael Pollack (M)

Centre for Rehab Innovations, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Hunter New England Local Health District, Rankin Park Centre, New Lambton Heights, Australia.

Frederick Rohan Walker (FR)

Centre for Rehab Innovations, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.

Michael Nilsson (M)

Centre for Rehab Innovations, University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

Classifications MeSH