Stimulating the Uptake of Preconception Care by Women With a Vulnerable Health Status Through mHealth App-Based Nudging (Pregnant Faster): Cocreation Design and Protocol for a Cohort Study.

ethics health inequality lifestyle mHealth mental stressor mobile health mobile phone periconception preconception care pregnancy socioeconomic status

Journal

JMIR research protocols
ISSN: 1929-0748
Titre abrégé: JMIR Res Protoc
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101599504

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 23 12 2022
accepted: 03 05 2023
revised: 22 04 2023
medline: 9 8 2023
pubmed: 9 8 2023
entrez: 9 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Women with a low socioeconomic status often have a vulnerable health status due to an accumulation of health-deteriorating factors such as poor lifestyle behaviors, including inadequate nutrition, mental stressors, and impaired health literacy and agency, which puts them at an unnecessary high risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Adequately preparing for pregnancy through preconception care (PCC) uptake and lifestyle improvement can improve these outcomes. We hypothesize that nudging is a successful way of encouraging engagement in PCC. A nudge is a behavioral intervention that changes choice behavior through influencing incentives. The mobile health (mHealth) app-based loyalty program Pregnant Faster aims to reward women in an ethically justified way and nudges to engage in pregnancy preparation by visiting a PCC consultation. Here, we first describe the process of the cocreation of the mHealth app Pregnant Faster that aims to increase engagement in pregnancy preparation by women with a vulnerable health status. Second, we describe the cohort study design to assess the feasibility of Pregnant Faster. The content of the app is based on the eHealth lifestyle coaching program Smarter Pregnancy, which has proven to be effective in ameliorating preconceptional lifestyle behaviors (folic acid, vegetables, fruits, smoking, and alcohol) and an interview study pertaining to the preferences of the target group with regard to an mHealth app stimulating PCC uptake. For moral guidance on the design, an ethical framework was developed based on the bioethical principles of Beauchamp and Childress. The app was further developed through iterative cocreation with the target group and health care providers. For 4 weeks, participants will engage with Pregnant Faster, during which opportunities will arise to earn coins such as reading informative blogs and registering for a PCC consultation. Coins can be spent on small fun rewards, such as folic acid, fruits, and mascara. Pregnant Faster's feasibility will be tested in a study including 40 women aged 18 to 45 years, who are preconceptional or <8 weeks pregnant, with a low educational level, and living in a deprived neighborhood. The latter 2 factors will serve as a proxy of a low socioeconomic status. Recruitment will take place through flyers, social media, and health care practices. After finalization, participants will evaluate the app through the "mHealth App Usability Questionnaire" and additional interviews or questionnaires. Results are expected to be published by December 2023. Pregnant Faster has been designed through iterative cocreation with the target group and health care professionals. With the designed study, we will test Pregnant Faster's feasibility. If overall user satisfaction and PCC uptake is achieved, the app will be further developed and the cohort will be continued with an additional 400 inclusions to establish effectiveness. DERR1-10.2196/45293.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Women with a low socioeconomic status often have a vulnerable health status due to an accumulation of health-deteriorating factors such as poor lifestyle behaviors, including inadequate nutrition, mental stressors, and impaired health literacy and agency, which puts them at an unnecessary high risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Adequately preparing for pregnancy through preconception care (PCC) uptake and lifestyle improvement can improve these outcomes. We hypothesize that nudging is a successful way of encouraging engagement in PCC. A nudge is a behavioral intervention that changes choice behavior through influencing incentives. The mobile health (mHealth) app-based loyalty program Pregnant Faster aims to reward women in an ethically justified way and nudges to engage in pregnancy preparation by visiting a PCC consultation.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
Here, we first describe the process of the cocreation of the mHealth app Pregnant Faster that aims to increase engagement in pregnancy preparation by women with a vulnerable health status. Second, we describe the cohort study design to assess the feasibility of Pregnant Faster.
METHODS METHODS
The content of the app is based on the eHealth lifestyle coaching program Smarter Pregnancy, which has proven to be effective in ameliorating preconceptional lifestyle behaviors (folic acid, vegetables, fruits, smoking, and alcohol) and an interview study pertaining to the preferences of the target group with regard to an mHealth app stimulating PCC uptake. For moral guidance on the design, an ethical framework was developed based on the bioethical principles of Beauchamp and Childress. The app was further developed through iterative cocreation with the target group and health care providers. For 4 weeks, participants will engage with Pregnant Faster, during which opportunities will arise to earn coins such as reading informative blogs and registering for a PCC consultation. Coins can be spent on small fun rewards, such as folic acid, fruits, and mascara. Pregnant Faster's feasibility will be tested in a study including 40 women aged 18 to 45 years, who are preconceptional or <8 weeks pregnant, with a low educational level, and living in a deprived neighborhood. The latter 2 factors will serve as a proxy of a low socioeconomic status. Recruitment will take place through flyers, social media, and health care practices. After finalization, participants will evaluate the app through the "mHealth App Usability Questionnaire" and additional interviews or questionnaires.
RESULTS RESULTS
Results are expected to be published by December 2023.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Pregnant Faster has been designed through iterative cocreation with the target group and health care professionals. With the designed study, we will test Pregnant Faster's feasibility. If overall user satisfaction and PCC uptake is achieved, the app will be further developed and the cohort will be continued with an additional 400 inclusions to establish effectiveness.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) UNASSIGNED
DERR1-10.2196/45293.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37556197
pii: v12i1e45293
doi: 10.2196/45293
pmc: PMC10448288
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e45293

Informations de copyright

©Sharissa M Smith, Babette Bais, Hafez Ismaili M'hamdi, Maartje H N Schermer, Regine P M Steegers-Theunissen. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 09.08.2023.

Références

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006 Jun 17;150(24):1326-30
pubmed: 16808362
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jun 24;22(1):1252
pubmed: 35751043
Reprod Biomed Online. 2022 Jun;44(6):1123-1133
pubmed: 35361546
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Dec 10;111(2):167-72
pubmed: 14597246
Br J Nutr. 2016 Jun;115(12):2252-63
pubmed: 27185414
Eur J Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;26(2):165-80
pubmed: 21203801
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011 May;25(3):236-45
pubmed: 21470263
Midwifery. 2018 Apr;59:62-67
pubmed: 29396381
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Apr;83:42-9
pubmed: 23465203
J R Soc Med. 2004;97 Suppl 44:43-7
pubmed: 15239293
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Jan;21(1):21-28
pubmed: 27423236
Fertil Steril. 2020 Nov;114(5):945-954
pubmed: 32741619
Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Oct;35(4):453-460
pubmed: 28688924
BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):250
pubmed: 29439681
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 17;13(12):e0208759
pubmed: 30557396
Front Pediatr. 2017 Apr 13;5:69
pubmed: 28451583
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013 Mar;26(5):473-81
pubmed: 23039164
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;44(4):1211-23
pubmed: 25944819
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Jul 13;22(1):559
pubmed: 35831786
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep;56(3):511-9
pubmed: 23787713
J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2018 Feb;9(1):58-62
pubmed: 28829006
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Aug;75(4):761-9
pubmed: 22475407
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Dec 13;152(50):2734-40
pubmed: 19192587
J Hypertens. 2008 Jun;26(6):1200-8
pubmed: 18475158
Placenta. 2017 Dec;60:115-118
pubmed: 28473168
Matern Child Health J. 2012 Dec;16(9):1854-61
pubmed: 22173331
Prev Med. 2008 Mar;46(3):238-46
pubmed: 18055007
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;51(2):349-59
pubmed: 18463465
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 11;7(4):e11664
pubmed: 30973345
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 1;17(1):254
pubmed: 28764640
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 30;22(9):e19378
pubmed: 32996885
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 May 27;4(2):e53
pubmed: 27234926
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 11;7(4):e11500
pubmed: 30973342
JAMA. 2010 Mar 24;303(12):1159-66
pubmed: 20332401
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016 Oct;71(10):603-612
pubmed: 27770130
Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Nov-Dec;19(6):640-55
pubmed: 23959022
BMJ. 2007 Nov 10;335(7627):974
pubmed: 17975258

Auteurs

Sharissa M Smith (SM)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Babette Bais (B)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Hafez Ismaili M'hamdi (H)

Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Maartje H N Schermer (MHN)

Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Regine P M Steegers-Theunissen (RPM)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH